The post The more Jack Mallers says Twenty One is ‘different,’ the more its stock falls appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Over the last month, shares of JackThe post The more Jack Mallers says Twenty One is ‘different,’ the more its stock falls appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Over the last month, shares of Jack

The more Jack Mallers says Twenty One is ‘different,’ the more its stock falls

Over the last month, shares of Jack Mallers’ Tether-supported public company Twenty One have lost a quarter of their value.

Despite Mallers’ insistence that he’s different from all the other bitcoin (BTC) industry executives, his stock price has the same story as everyone else.

Over the same time period, Michael Saylor’s Strategy, the world’s largest BTC treasury company, has declined by an identical 25%. Peers in the BTC treasury sector are essentially in line with Saylor.

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Asset Management is down 31%, David Bailey’s Nakamoto is down 36%, Adam Back’s H100 Group is down 31%, Xin Jin’s Cango is down 31%, and Eric Semler and Natalie Brunell’s Semler is down 30%.

Mallers’ supposed differentiation of Twenty One doesn’t seem to be convincing investors. Their sales of his stock are indiscriminate.

Year-to-date chart of Twenty One. Source: TradingView.

Twenty One holds 43,514 BTC worth $3.92 billion. Those holdings exactly match its current market capitalization, meaning that investors currently place $0 premium on all of Mallers’ supposed differentiated value propositions.

These include cash flow, strategic alliances, his business acumen, and that of Twenty One shareholders Tether, Cantor Fitzgerald, and Softbank.

That Mallers has been unable to convince investors to pay anything beyond the liquidation value of the company’s BTC is incredible given his who’s who of billionaire backers.

The list features such names as Softbank’s Masayoshi Son with an estimated $38 billion personal net worth, Tether’s Giancarlo Devasini with $13 billion, Tether billionaires Jean-Louis van der Velde and Paolo Ardoino, and the son of billionaire US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

The intent to have cash flow

Mallers has nebulously claimed that Twenty One isn’t just a passive balance‑sheet trade like the dozens of other digital asset treasury stocks, despite its market cap exactly equaling its treasury value.

In Mallers’ mind, Twenty One is a “Bitcoin‑native” operating business explicitly focused on growing “BTC per share” through multiple business lines.

“We’re bringing a lot of BTC products to market with the intent to have cash flow,” Mallers told a CNBC television audience yesterday.

So far, however, the company hasn’t reported any cash flow in quarterly earnings. 

Worse, its stock price has underperformed the S&P 500 by about 500 basis points year to date — a time period that spans to before the Cantor SPAC even merged with Twenty One. 

Read more: Mallers says no bitcoin rehypothecation at Strike — but what about re-pledging?

In other words, even if someone had pre-purchased shares in the public company that took Twenty One public using insider knowledge about Tether’s deal, its half dozen billionaire backers, the support of Softbank, and the company’s countless media appearances, they still would have made more money just buying a stock market index.

Even slightly underperforming the S&P 500 by insider trading would have been the best case scenario.

In fact, almost every retail investor in Twenty One has lost money. Since the deal was announced on April 23, its stock price has only spent a single trading day at prices lower than today’s price.

Every other investor, for 157 trading days, has lost money. From its peak in May, the stock has declined 80%.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/the-more-jack-mallers-says-twenty-one-is-different-the-more-its-stock-falls/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16