TLDR A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder TheTLDR A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder The

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Stock: Jury Orders $1.5 Billion Payment in Talc Cancer Lawsuit

TLDR

  • A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder
  • The verdict includes $59.84 million in compensatory damages and $1.5 billion in punitive damages split between J&J and its subsidiary
  • Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the decision, calling it “egregious” and “unconstitutional”
  • The company faces over 67,000 lawsuits related to talc products and cancer claims
  • J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. in 2020 and globally in 2023

A Baltimore jury delivered a massive blow to Johnson & Johnson on Monday, ordering the healthcare giant and its subsidiaries to pay more than $1.5 billion to a single plaintiff in a talc cancer case. The verdict represents the largest-ever sum awarded against J&J for an individual plaintiff in these ongoing legal battles.

The Circuit Court for Baltimore City found J&J, two of its subsidiaries, and spinoff Kenvue liable for failing to warn Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos. Craft was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in January 2024.


JNJ Stock Card
Johnson & Johnson, JNJ

The award breaks down to $59.84 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages totaling $1.5 billion. J&J received a $1 billion punitive damage assessment, while its subsidiary Pecos River Talc was hit with $500 million.

Company Maintains Products Are Safe

J&J wasted no time announcing its intention to appeal. Erik Haas, the company’s worldwide vice president of litigation, called the ruling “egregious” and “patently unconstitutional.” He argued the decision resulted from “gross errors” by the trial court.

This isn’t J&J’s first rodeo with large talc verdicts. Earlier in December, a California jury awarded $40 million to two women who blamed the company’s baby powder for their ovarian cancer.

The company faces a staggering backlog of over 67,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs claiming cancer diagnoses after using its baby powder and other talc products. J&J has consistently denied these allegations.

The company has tried to resolve the litigation through bankruptcy settlements worth billions. Courts have rejected those attempts.

J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020. The company ended global sales in 2023, switching to cornstarch-based alternatives instead.

Many previous large awards against J&J in talc cases have been reduced or overturned on appeal. The company has set aside billions of dollars for litigation costs and settlements.

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare cancer affecting the lining of the abdomen and abdominal organs. It’s most commonly linked to asbestos exposure. While no cure exists, treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, and palliative care can help manage symptoms.

The Maryland jury found J&J and Kenvue liable for failing to provide adequate warnings about potential asbestos content in their talc products.

The post Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Stock: Jury Orders $1.5 Billion Payment in Talc Cancer Lawsuit appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
1 Logo
1 Price(1)
$0.007573
$0.007573$0.007573
+0.42%
USD
1 (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16