LISTED real estate developer LFM Properties Corp. has acquired a 918-square-meter lot in Salcedo Village, Makati City, as part of its portfolio expansion. In a LISTED real estate developer LFM Properties Corp. has acquired a 918-square-meter lot in Salcedo Village, Makati City, as part of its portfolio expansion. In a

LFM Properties expands Makati portfolio with P1.1-B land deal

LISTED real estate developer LFM Properties Corp. has acquired a 918-square-meter lot in Salcedo Village, Makati City, as part of its portfolio expansion.

In a disclosure on Tuesday, the company said it had entered into an agreement to acquire the property from Parity Values, Inc.

The land is situated along Valero and San Agustin Streets, Barangay Bel-Air, Makati City, and the acquisition is covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. S-87611.

The property was acquired for a total of P1.1 billion, including value-added tax. LFM Properties’ board of directors approved the purchase on Dec. 23, it said.

The purchase price was based on a valuation report from a third-party adviser jointly selected by the company and the seller.

Payment for the property will be made under a one-year term, with no conditions precedent to the transaction.

“The acquisition is expected to add to the company’s property portfolio,” LFM Properties said.

The company currently owns three buildings in Makati City — Liberty Plaza Building, Liberty Center, and Liberty Building.

LFM Properties is a subsidiary of listed Liberty Flour Mills, Inc., a pioneer in flour milling since 1958.

The company reported a 14% decline in third-quarter gross revenues to P168.4 million from P196.7 million a year ago, mainly due to vacant units in Liberty Plaza Building.

Shares of LFM Properties last closed on Dec. 18 at four centavos each. — Beatriz Marie D. Cruz

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16