Uganda has placed strict restrictions on Starlink satellite internet technology just weeks before the country’s general elections.  Ugandan citizens now requireUganda has placed strict restrictions on Starlink satellite internet technology just weeks before the country’s general elections.  Ugandan citizens now require

Uganda's government has imposed immediate restrictions requiring military clearance for all Starlink equipment imports

Uganda has placed strict restrictions on Starlink satellite internet technology just weeks before the country’s general elections. 

Ugandan citizens now require authorization from General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the Chief of Defence Forces and the son of President Yoweri Museveni, to import Starlink’s technology.

The direct-to-satellite internet service that Elon Musk’s SpaceX operates has the antidote to the problem that traditional options have, being that they can be easily shut down. Starlink, on the other hand, would be able to connect users throughout sensitive periods like Uganda’s elections, where authorities have historically disabled services.

According to an official memorandum from the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA), anyone wishing to import Starlink equipment must now obtain authorization from General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the Chief of Defence Forces and the son of President Yoweri Museveni.

The restriction took effect immediately and applies to all of Starlink’s technology, including communication equipment and associated components. Customs state that any import declaration for these items must present a clearance letter from the UPDF Chief of Defence Forces.

Robert Kyagulanyi, known as Bobi Wine, said in a social media post that the government’s decision is evidence that the regime is “gripped by fear.”

He questioned why the government would require clearance from the long-time president’s son for Starlink imports. “If they’re not planning mischief (electoral fraud),” he wrote. “Why are they so scared of people accessing interest during the electoral process?”

CNN international correspondent Larry Madowo noted that the ban comes just weeks before the election and pointed out the government’s track record of shutting down the internet during polls.

During Uganda’s 2021 general elections, the internet was shut down for several days, resulting in severely limited communication and information about the electoral process.

With Starlink, Ugandans could theoretically maintain internet connectivity even if traditional internet service providers are ordered to shut down their services. This would allow opposition groups, civil society organizations, and journalists to continue documenting and sharing information about the electoral process.

What are the international implications?

Access Now and similar groups have expressed concerns that these types of restrictions are frequently used to suppress “unfavorable” opinions and control information during periods of political tension.

Robert Kalumba, an official from the Uganda Revenue Authority, who defended the restriction, said the complaints from the public are a “storm in a teacup.”

His argument is that security clearance for satellite technology is a standard global practice, but he failed to acknowledge the sensitive timing of the restriction and also the specific requirement for personal authorization from General Kainerugaba.

General Muhoozi Kainerugaba is a known controversial figure who has been positioned as a potential successor to his father.

Several countries have implemented various forms of internet restrictions during elections and protests, and satellite internet technology like Starlink represents a solution in this ongoing struggle between governments and citizens.

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.00169
$0.00169$0.00169
-1.16%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16