Bitcoin’s active growth trend, measured by the 365‑day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level in six years, according to on‑chain data. The metric highlights a prolonged slowdown in new network participation and address activity growth, even as Bitcoin trades within a mature, institutionally influenced market.
The active growth trend tracks the rate of change in active addresses over time. By smoothing it with a 365‑day moving average, analysts filter out short‑term noise to observe structural adoption trends rather than daily fluctuations.
A six‑year low indicates that net new address growth is expanding more slowly than at any point since the previous cycle’s late‑stage consolidation.
On‑chain data sources:
https://glassnode.com/
https://cryptoquant.com/
Several structural factors help explain the decline:
In short, capital inflows no longer map one‑to‑one with address growth.
Historically, low active growth readings have appeared during:
In past cycles, similar conditions often preceded volatility expansion, though not necessarily immediate price appreciation.
While slowing active growth may appear concerning at first glance, analysts caution that it does not automatically imply weakening demand. Instead, it reflects Bitcoin’s transition from a retail‑driven adoption curve to a capital‑weighted, institution‑driven network.
In previous cycles, strong price trends have occurred even as active growth remained subdued, particularly when long‑term holders were accumulating and liquid supply was tightening.
Key indicators to monitor alongside active growth include:
Together, these provide a clearer picture of whether Bitcoin is consolidating for expansion or entering a period of demand stagnation.
Bitcoin’s active growth trend hitting a six‑year low underscores a structural shift in how adoption occurs. The network is no longer expanding primarily through new retail addresses, but through deeper capital deployment by fewer, larger participants.
Whether this marks a pause before the next expansion—or a longer period of consolidation—will depend less on new addresses and more on how much capital is willing to hold Bitcoin at current levels.


