ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvents
More
The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulatingThe post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulating

David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus

Author: CoinPediaSource: CoinPedia
2026/02/02 20:50
Ripple XRP email controversy

The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Unverified claims circulating online are once again linking early crypto figures, old emails, and the long-running XRP story. At the centre of the discussion is an alleged email from July 31, 2014, said to have been sent by tech entrepreneur Austin Hill, which raised concerns about Ripple and Stellar, a project founded by Jed McCaleb, who also co-founded Ripple and XRP.

What the Alleged Email Says

According to online posts, the email was addressed to Joichi Ito and Jeffrey Epstein, with the subject line “Stellar isn’t so Stellar.” In it, Hill allegedly warned that it was harmful for the ecosystem to have investors “backing two horses in the same race,” referring to Ripple and Stellar competing for the same financial backers.

Commentators claim this points to early power struggles in crypto’s formative years, though there is no proof of wrongdoing by any of the parties involved.

Claims Around MIT and Funding

The narrative goes further, alleging that Epstein had financial ties to academic institutions such as MIT’s Media Lab, where blockchain research was conducted. Public records have previously confirmed that Epstein donated money to MIT. However, claims that this funding influenced crypto markets, projects, or regulators remain unproven.

Some online discussions also try to connect these past associations to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple, filed in 2020, and to former SEC chair Gary Gensler, who previously taught blockchain-related courses at MIT. While allegations of conflicts of interest are being circulated, there is no evidence that the SEC’s case against Ripple was driven by these academic or personal links.

  • Also Read :
  •   XRP Price Holds Support After Selloff as On-Chain Data Shows Reduced Downside Risk
  •   ,

David Schwartz Responds

Reacting to the resurfaced claims, David Schwartz, Chief Technology Officer at Ripple, shared a cautious but pointed view:

What Is Fact and What Is Not

Experts stress that many of these stories rely heavily on speculation, coincidence, and unverified interpretations rather than confirmed facts. The Ripple vs SEC case has unfolded mainly through court filings and judicial rulings, not leaked emails or historical associations.

As of now, there is no official confirmation that the alleged 2014 email or the relationships being discussed had any influence on XRP, Bitcoin, or regulatory decisions. Analysts caution investors to separate documented facts from online theories, especially during volatile market conditions when such narratives tend to spread quickly.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Could these claims affect investor confidence in Ripple or Stellar?

Speculative claims can temporarily influence sentiment, causing some investors to hesitate. However, long-term confidence typically relies on project fundamentals, regulatory clarity, and market performance rather than historical allegations.

Should investors worry about unverified crypto conspiracies?

Speculative stories can spread fast, especially in volatile markets, but confirmed facts should guide investment decisions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Telos Advisers Welcomes Stephen Gardner as a Strategic Advisory Board Member

Telos Advisers Welcomes Stephen Gardner as a Strategic Advisory Board Member

Former Amtrak CEO brings more than 25 years of leadership experience in rail, infrastructure delivery, and national transportation policy NEWARK, N.J.–(BUSINESS
Share
AI Journal2026/02/03 02:16
ONDO Price Crashes 88% From All-Time Highs, But Analyst Says ‘Last Hope’ Zone Is Here

ONDO Price Crashes 88% From All-Time Highs, But Analyst Says ‘Last Hope’ Zone Is Here

The ONDO price has drifted into a part of the chart that usually gets traders paying attention. After months of downside, the price is now sitting inside a zone
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/03 02:30