The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to… The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to…

For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good

Universal Pictures

Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first.

Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name.

Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’?

It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz.

If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story.

Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood.

Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today.

The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both).

Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked.

Maguire’s novel aimed to deconstruct the events of The Wizard of Oz, asking how the Wicked Witch came to be viewed as a one-dimensional villain.

Maguire borrowed elements from the Wizard of Oz book and film, creating a morally ambiguous prequel that was never meant to be canon.

Wicked: For Good is a retelling of a familiar tale, with a twist.

What Is The Plot Of The Original ‘Wizard Of Oz’?

The 1939 film sees Dorothy forced out of Kansas after a hurricane lifts her house and drops it into the magical land of Oz.

Dorothy’s house accidently crushes the Wicked Witch of the East, oppressor of the Munchkins, and as a reward, Glinda the Good gives Dorothy the witch’s magical ruby slippers (the slippers appear as silver in Wicked: For Good, which is the color from the original novel).

Dorothy sets off on the Yellow Brick Road to see the Wizard of Oz and find a way home, but makes three friends along the way—the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Cowardly Lion.

The trio all feel that they are lacking something, with Scarecrow seeking a brain, the Tin Man a heart, and the Cowardly Lion, courage.

The Wizard tasks the three with slaying the Wicked Witch of the West. They manage to do so by accident—the Wicked Witch sets fire to Scarecrow and Dorothy throws water to put it out, melting the Wicked Witch into a puddle.

Returning to the Emerald City for their reward, the three uncover the truth about the Wizard—he’s just an ordinary man from Dorothy’s world.

However, the Wizard proves to be a trickster with a heart of gold, giving the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion trinkets which fool them into uncovering the positive traits they had all along.

The Wizard plans to return Dorothy to Kansas with a hot air balloon, but he is lifted into the air without Dorothy after Toto runs away.

Glinda the Good returns to reassure Dorothy that she, just like her companions, had the solution all along, and Dorothy uses the magical slippers to return home.

The film frames the entire trip as a dream, contrary to the novel.

Wicked: For Good inserts a more complex narrative under the surface of Dorothy’s journey.

How ‘Wicked: for Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

Wicked: For Good creates origin stories for Dorothy’s three companions, and even explains the hurricane that brought her to Kansas as the work of Madame Morrible (Michelle Yeoh).

Warning—spoilers ahead.

The Tin Man

Elphaba visits her disabled sister, Nessarose (Marissa Bode), who rules Munchkinland, and enchants Nessa’s silver slippers as a good deed, enabling her sister to fly.

This backfires after Nessa’s lover, Boq (Ethan Slater) storms out, intimidated by the use of magic.

Nessa then uses the Grimmerie, the powerful spellbook of Oz, to enchant Boq’s heart and make him stay with her forever.

Nessa botches the spell and shrinks his heart, forcing Elphaba to create a desperate curse to save Boq, transforming him into a metal man with no heart—the Tin Man.

The original novel gives the Tin Man a grisly, somewhat similar origin. He falls in love with a servant of the Wicked Witch of the East, and the witch blocks their marriage by cursing his axe, making it cut off a body part with each swing. Over time, his body is replaced piece by piece.

The 1939 film does not give the Tin Man an origin, but he does mention that “the tinsmith forgot to give me a heart,” suggesting that he was built.

Dorothy’s Arrival, And The Scarecrow’s Origin

We only see Dorothy from the back in Wicked: For Good—the protagonist of The Wizard of Oz is flipped into a mysterious agent of chaos who traverses through the land, making huge changes without ever knowing the truth of her actions.

Madame Morrible deliberately creates the tornado and drops Dorothy’s house onto Nessarose, murdering her and leading to Glinda giving the silver slippers to Dorothy.

This enrages Elphaba, resulting in her and Glinda having a physical fight, broken up by Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey), Glinda’s ex-husband and Elphaba’s true love.

Fiyero sacrifices himself to Oz’s guards, allowing Elphaba to escape.

Fiyero is beaten almost to death by the guards and hung on a wooden cross, and again, in desperation, Elphaba uses her magic to protect Fiyero from all bodily harm, transforming him into a Scarecrow.

In the novel, the Scarecrow is just a scarecrow, and describes himself coming into consciousness as a Munchkin farmer creates his body.

The 1939 film does not bother with an origin—the Scarecrow’s romantic backstory with Glinda and Elphaba is solely a Wicked invention.

The Cowardly Lion

The Cowardly Lion (Colman Domingo) first appears as a cub in Wicked, protected by Elphaba. In Wicked: For Good, this good deed is reframed as a disservice, with Elphaba blamed for the lion growing up to be a coward.

It’s unclear if the Cowardly Lion actually believes this, or is too scared to speak up.

In the novel, there is no origin story, nor is the Cowardly Lion ever really afraid. In fact, the novel makes it clear that all three companions excel in the exact qualities they believe they lack, but the 1939 film depicts the Cowardly Lion as very cowardly indeed.

Oz’s repression of the talking animal population is also an invention of Wicked, reframing the Wizard of Oz into a wicked trickster rather than benevolent liar.

The Wizard of Oz

Wicked: For Good depicts the Wizard as a villain and ruthless tyrant, who represses the animal population as a means to seize control.

The twist ending of For Good reveals that the Wizard is actually Elphaba’s father, who “seduced” Elphaba’s mother using a magic potion that resulted in her green skin.

The Wizard is surprised to hear this, and leaves the Land of Oz in shame after Glinda tells him the truth.

The original film and novel take a much more sympathetic approach to the Wizard—he’s a shameless huckster who takes advantage of the naivety of Oz’s citizens, but he’s also a good leader and an inspiration to many.

In later novels (Baum wrote several sequels), the Wizard returns to the story, and his role in Oz’s history is revealed to be more sinister than it first seems, as he displaced the royal family and placed himself as the ruler of the Land.

However, he is never depicted as an outright villain—he’s a kindly trickster, a man who followed his ambition as far as it would go, lying every step of the way.

Wicked: For Good ends with Elphaba reunited with Fiyero, fleeing the Land of Oz by crossing a vast, uninhabited desert. This desert doesn’t appear in The Wizard of Oz, but it is part of Baum’s books, and is known as the Deadly Desert.

The Deadly Desert surrounds Oz, and is covered with sand that kills all those who touch it, which is clearly not part of Wicked canon.

However, the Deadly Desert can be seen in the surprisingly dark sequel to The Wizard of Oz, the 1985 film Return to Oz. If you’ve watched both Wicked films and The Wizard of Oz, give Return to Oz a watch (it’s available to stream on Disney+).

Like Wicked: For Good, Return to Oz is a different take on Baum’s world, and is more faithful to the books than the 1939 film.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesThe Tragic Ending Of ‘Wicked,’ ExplainedForbes‘Wicked’—Ariana Grande And Cynthia Erivo’s ‘Holding Space’ Meme, ExplainedForbesThe AI-Altered ‘Wizard Of Oz’ Controversy, ExplainedForbesDisney Fans Want To Know—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’?

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/22/how-wicked-for-good-connects-to-the-wizard-of-oz/

Market Opportunity
Witch Token Logo
Witch Token Price(WITCH)
$0,0325
$0,0325$0,0325
+2,52%
USD
Witch Token (WITCH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00