Oracle, Meta, xAI, and CoreWeave are pushing more than $120 billion of AI data center spending off their balance sheets, using Wall Street money and complex legalOracle, Meta, xAI, and CoreWeave are pushing more than $120 billion of AI data center spending off their balance sheets, using Wall Street money and complex legal

Oracle, Meta, xAI, CoreWeave move $120B of AI debt off books using Wall Street SPVs

Oracle, Meta, xAI, and CoreWeave are pushing more than $120 billion of AI data center spending off their balance sheets, using Wall Street money and complex legal structures to fund the infrastructure behind artificial intelligence.

The financing is flowing through special purpose vehicles, known as SPVs, allowing the companies to secure computing power while keeping large debts out of their core financial statements.

The deals have pulled in private capital from Pimco, BlackRock, Apollo, Blue Owl Capital, and major US banks, including JPMorgan, according to the Financial Times.

The money sits inside SPVs that own land, buildings, and chips, so the tech companies are leasing the assets.

Private capital absorbs massive AI data center borrowing

Silicon Valley companies once relied on cash and low debt, but that changed as the race for AI computing power intensified and building data centers now requires tens of billions of dollars at a time.

Meta set the pace in October with a $30 billion private credit deal for its planned Hyperion data center in Louisiana, putting the project inside an SPV called Beignet Investor, created with Blue Owl Capital.

The investment vehicle raised about $27 billion in loans from Pimco, BlackRock, Apollo, and other investors, alongside $3 billion in equity from Blue Owl. None of the debt appeared on Meta’s balance sheet, and that allowed the company raise another $30 billion in corporate bonds in November.

Meanwhile, Oracle leases compute to OpenAI, so it has partnered with builders and financiers such as Crusoe, Vantage, Related Digital, and Blue Owl to develop multiple data centers, each owned by separate SPVs.

One vehicle backing the Abilene, Texas facility received about $13 billion from Blue Owl and JPMorgan, including $10 billion in debt. Other arrangements include a $38 billion debt package for sites in Texas and Wisconsin and an $18 billion loan for a New Mexico location.

In every case, Oracle leases the facilities while lenders hold claims on the assets.

Risk spreads across Wall Street as SPVs multiply

Investors often believe the real risk is still with the tech company leasing the site, as exemplified by Meta’s Beignet Investor deal. Meta owns 20% of the SPV and provided a residual value guarantee, meaning it would repay investors if the data center value drops below a set level at lease end and Meta does not renew.

Elon Musk’s xAI is pursuing a similar approach. The startup is raising $20 billion, including as much as $12.5 billion in debt. An SPV will use the funds to buy Nvidia graphics processing units and lease them back to xAI.

CoreWeave has followed the same path. In March, the company created an SPV to meet an $11.9 billion contract to supply computing power to OpenAI. In July, it borrowed $2.6 billion to finance those obligations.

Private capital interest remains strong. UBS said tech companies had borrowed about $450 billion from private funds by early 2025, up $100 billion from the prior year. Around $125 billion flowed into project finance deals this year alone.

Data center construction now depends heavily on the $1.7 trillion private credit market, where concerns around valuation, illiquidity, and borrower concentration are growing.

But the risk is getting bigger as more companies adopt the same structures, because OpenAI alone has committed more than $1.4 trillion in long-term computing contracts across the industry.

Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have avoided SPVs so far, funding data centers with cash and traditional bonds.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Sberbank explores crypto-backed loans as Russia softens stance on digital assets

Sberbank explores crypto-backed loans as Russia softens stance on digital assets

Russian financial services giant Sberbank may soon start offering loans secured by cryptocurrency, one of its top executives unveiled.         The news comes right
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/25 23:38
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Understanding the Construction Industry Scheme

Understanding the Construction Industry Scheme

The Construction Industry Scheme, commonly known as CIS, is a tax system used in the UK construction sector. It sets out how payments made by contractors to subcontractors
Share
Techbullion2025/12/25 23:53