LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday. “We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of […]LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday. “We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of […]

P180B likely lost to ‘ghost’ projects since 2016, senator says

LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday.

“We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of 10,000 projects were ghost, we estimated that 6% or higher of 30,000 projects could mean P180 billion or higher went to ghost projects,” he said in a statement.

He added that the estimates were based on the 10,000 flood control projects inspected so far, which found that about 600 of them were nonexistent.

“Imagine, we likely lost P180 billion to ghost projects, and we have not yet started counting our losses to substandard projects,” Mr. Lacson added.

He said that the estimates had rendered the number of projects tackled by the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee as “minuscule.”

“The Blue Ribbon Committee remains ready to help relevant agencies like the Independent Commission for Infrastructure, Department of Justice and Office of the Ombudsman in pursuing charges against those involved, if it gets new information,” Mr. Lacson said. 

The committee has been investigating kickbacks involving multibillion-peso flood control projects, following reports that lawmakers and public officials benefited from infrastructure funds allocated since 2022.

The senator added that the Senate and the House of Representatives have agreed to simplify the bicameral conference committee (bicam) that would only tackle the disagreeing provisions of the budget bill.

“This will be simpler and more transparent and that is our intention. In the bicam, we will ensure transparency, all the way to the bill being enrolled,” Mr. Lacson said.

Malacañang announced earlier that the bicameral conference committee meetings will be livestreamed, following public calls for more transparency and accountability in the budget process. 

DPWH ‘GHOST’ PROJECTS
Meanwhile, the Commission on Audit (CoA) flagged the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) after some regional offices declared nearly P2 billion worth of infrastructure projects as accomplished nationwide despite the works not being completed in 2024.

State auditors gave a qualified opinion on the DPWH’s financial report due to “aggregate uncorrected misstatements” involving the agency’s billions of pesos worth of infrastructure, including P1.95 billion of projects marked as completed despite unfinished work.

“Some DPWH offices reported 100% project accomplishments in the Report on Publicized Government Programs, Projects and Activities,” CoA said in its 2024 audit report.

“However, ocular inspection and validation of the actual physical status revealed that these projects were not completed within the contract time due to defects, deficiencies requiring repairs and unfinished pay or work items,” it added.

Public Works Secretary Vivencio B. Dizon did not immediately reply to a Viber message seeking comment.

The DPWH has come under tighter scrutiny following allegations that flood control projects were tied to a multibillion‑peso kickback scheme involving politicians, officials and government contractors.

The projects, which auditors flagged as inaccurately tagged as finished, were found nationwide, with engineering offices in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR), Mimaropa, Western Visayas, and Northern Mindanao among those cited.

CoA also flagged that DPWH paid the “final progress billings” of 48 projects totaling P2.18 billion despite unfinished work or defects.

In CAR, the full amount of P1.3 billion was paid for 29 projects that were “not yet fully completed due to unfinished works.”

“On the other hand, it was noted in Region 3 that final payments on seven projects and the release of retention money for two projects were already made,” state auditors said, referring to 19 projects totaling P876.29 billion that faced completion delays. “The payment could be deemed ‘irregular.’”

CoA urged the DPWH to refrain from releasing project completion payments for projects not yet completed or “satisfactorily implemented.”

“Require contractors to immediately rectify or complete noted deficiencies and deliver all contractual requirements; otherwise forfeit their performance securities and consider them for blacklisting, if warranted,” state auditors said. — Adrian H. Halili and Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio

Market Opportunity
GhostwareOS Logo
GhostwareOS Price(GHOST)
$0.002248
$0.002248$0.002248
+5.24%
USD
GhostwareOS (GHOST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41