TLDR Polymarket confirms a security breach linked to a third-party authentication provider. Users who signed up via Magic Labs reported drained accounts after suspiciousTLDR Polymarket confirms a security breach linked to a third-party authentication provider. Users who signed up via Magic Labs reported drained accounts after suspicious

Polymarket Addresses Third-Party Provider Flaw After User Account Breach

TLDR

  • Polymarket confirms a security breach linked to a third-party authentication provider.
  • Users who signed up via Magic Labs reported drained accounts after suspicious logins.
  • The issue affected a small group of users, with Polymarket resolving the breach.
  • Polymarket vows to contact impacted users following the third-party vulnerability.

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, confirmed a security breach affecting several users. The breach was linked to a vulnerability in a third-party authentication provider, particularly impacting users who had signed up through Magic Labs. Users affected by the breach reported that their balances were drained after experiencing suspicious login attempts.

Reports Surface of Drained Accounts

The breach was first reported by users on social media platforms like Reddit and X, with individuals detailing how their accounts had been compromised. One user shared their experience on Reddit, stating, “Today I woke up and see 3 attempts to login to Polymarket — My device isn’t compromised, Google found nothing suspicious, all other services are fine.” The user later discovered that all their deals were closed, and their balance was reduced to just $0.01.

Other users reported similar incidents, where their Polymarket accounts were drained despite having two-factor authentication enabled on their email. The issue appears to have primarily affected users who signed up through Magic Labs, which facilitates non-custodial Ethereum wallets using email sign-ins. Magic Labs is known to attract first-time crypto users who don’t already have digital wallets.

Acknowledgment and Resolution from Polymarket

On December 23, Polymarket acknowledged the breach on its official Discord channel. The platform confirmed that it had identified and resolved the issue, assuring users that no ongoing risks remained. In their statement, Polymarket explained that the vulnerability stemmed from a third-party authentication provider and promised to contact the users impacted by the breach.

“We recently identified and resolved a security issue affecting a small number of users,” Polymarket noted. “The issue was caused by a vulnerability introduced by a third-party authentication provider. We will be in contact with impacted users,” the platform further clarified.

However, Polymarket did not provide specific details regarding the number of affected users or the total financial losses from the breach. Additionally, the identity of the third-party provider has not been disclosed.

Previous Security Issues and Ongoing Concerns

This latest incident is not the first time Polymarket has faced security concerns related to third-party services. In September 2024, a similar breach occurred involving Google logins. Users reported that attackers exploited a vulnerability in a third-party authentication system, draining USDC funds from their wallets. Polymarket had attributed the breach to targeted exploits related to the third-party service used for Google logins.

In November 2024, a separate phishing campaign exploited Polymarket’s comment sections, resulting in over $500,000 in user losses. Fraudulent links were shared in the comment sections, prompting users to log in through email, which led to stolen funds.

Ongoing Security Measures and User Safety

Polymarket emphasized that it has resolved the current security issue and assured users that there are no lingering risks. The platform has stated its commitment to reaching out to affected users to assist them further.

Despite these measures, the repeated nature of such security issues raises questions about the long-term security of platforms that rely on third-party authentication providers. With crypto-related hacks and scams on the rise, users are urged to remain vigilant and follow best practices for securing their accounts.

The post Polymarket Addresses Third-Party Provider Flaw After User Account Breach appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0088
$0.0088$0.0088
0.00%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ethereum Options Expiry Shows Risks Below $2,900

Ethereum Options Expiry Shows Risks Below $2,900

The post Ethereum Options Expiry Shows Risks Below $2,900 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ether (ETH) has been unable to sustain prices above $3,400 for the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 10:24
Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

The post Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell talks to reporters following the regular Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Fed on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Federal Reserve is projecting only one rate cut in 2026, fewer than expected, according to its median projection. The central bank’s so-called dot plot, which shows 19 individual members’ expectations anonymously, indicated a median estimate of 3.4% for the federal funds rate at the end of 2026. That compares to a median estimate of 3.6% for the end of this year following two expected cuts on top of Wednesday’s reduction. A single quarter-point reduction next year is significantly more conservative than current market pricing. Traders are currently pricing in at two to three more rate cuts next year, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, updated shortly after the decision. The gauge uses prices on 30-day fed funds futures contracts to determine market-implied odds for rate moves. Here are the Fed’s latest targets from 19 FOMC members, both voters and nonvoters: Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards The forecasts, however, showed a large difference of opinion with two voting members seeing as many as four cuts. Three officials penciled in three rate reductions next year. “Next year’s dot plot is a mosaic of different perspectives and is an accurate reflection of a confusing economic outlook, muddied by labor supply shifts, data measurement concerns, and government policy upheaval and uncertainty,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management. The central bank has two policy meetings left for the year, one in October and one in December. Economic projections from the Fed saw slightly faster economic growth in 2026 than was projected in June, while the outlook for inflation was updated modestly higher for next year. There’s a lot of uncertainty…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:59
Arizona Senator Proposes Exempting Bitcoin and Crypto from Taxes

Arizona Senator Proposes Exempting Bitcoin and Crypto from Taxes

Understanding the specific tax exemption proposal's scope, mechanics, and limitations provides foundation for evaluating feasibility and implications. The exemption presumably covers capital gains taxes on cryptocurrency appreciation at state level, though personal income tax and corporate tax treatment requires clarification. Scope questions include whether exemption applies to trading profits, mining income, staking rewards, DeFi yields, NFT sales, and business cryptocurrency revenue.
Share
MEXC NEWS2025/12/25 11:47