The post AI Trader Earns $2.2M on Polymarket Using Data Models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Here’s how an AI-powered trader earned $2.2 million on PolymarketThe post AI Trader Earns $2.2M on Polymarket Using Data Models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Here’s how an AI-powered trader earned $2.2 million on Polymarket

AI Trader Earns $2.2M on Polymarket Using Data Models

Here’s how an AI-powered trader earned $2.2 million on Polymarket using data models, automation and probability-based trading strategies.

A trader used artificial intelligence to shock Polymarket after earning $2.2 million in about two months. 

The account has the pseudonym ilovecircle and reportedly used data models rather than instinct to make trades. 

The story now shows how prediction markets reward automation and speed, rather than an ability to “guess” future outcomes.

How the AI Trading Strategy Worked on Polymarket

For context, Polymarket allows users to trade on future outcomes and each market represents a question with a yes or no answer. 

The shares pay one dollar if the outcome happens and zero if it fails. This way, prices show market belief.

The trader in question treated Polymarket like a quant trading venue and used little to no human judgment. Instead, algorithms handled nearly every step.

The trader used artificial intelligence to write code, track data and place trades in order to find events where market prices failed to reflect real odds.

The system focused on mispriced markets. When prices drifted from reality, the bot acted and took advantage of the gaps.

Related Reading: Polymarket Eyes $12B Valuation as Crypto Expansion Accelerates

Claude Helped Build the Trading System

The trader used Anthropic’s Claude AI as a coding partner, and this choice changed the scale of the operation.

Claude helped generate Python scripts that connected to the Polymarket API. These scripts handled authentication, pricing data and trade execution.

Debugging happened faster as the AI helped fix errors in real time. The model also improved its execution logic through constant iteration.

Building such a system once required a full engineering team. However, one person could now manage it using AI tools alone.

The trader also built a dashboard to monitor large accounts. This allowed them quick reactions to whale activity.

Data Sources Powered the Decision Engine

The bot relied on more than Polymarket odds and pulled in data from many channels.

The trader used news feeds and social media sentiment to update the system as events unfolded, and on-chain activity showed how large traders behaved.

They also used legislative trackers to monitor bill progress alongside sports data streams that provided updated scores and injuries. 

Each source fed into a single model, which compared real-world signals against market prices.

Probability Modelling Replaced Gut Feelings

The trader also relied on probability math that compared two numbers.

The first number came from Polymarket prices, with a share price at 0.60 implying a 60% chance.

The second number came from the AI model, which calculated probability based on live data.

If the model estimated a 75% chance while the market showed 60%, the trade made sense and was likely to be positive.

This logic was repeated thousands of times, and individual losses mattered less than aggregate results.

Reports also indicate that the system achieved about 74% accuracy across trades across markets like sports, crypto events and political outcomes.

Overall, the story shows how tools that were once reserved for institutional use are now available to individuals. AI is reducing barriers to entry, and coding skills may now matter more than intuition.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/this-polymarket-trader-made-2-2m-in-60-days-using-ai-heres-what-that-means-for-prediction-markets/

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03812
$0.03812$0.03812
+2.30%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41