The post Another Crypto Lawsuit Over: Tether to Pay Compensation to Celsius in Billion Dollar Bitcoin (BTC) Case! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Celsius filed a lawsuit against USDT issuer Tether in 2024, demanding the return of $2.4 billion worth of Bitcoin at the time. The dispute between Celsius and Tether stemmed from a 2022 agreement in which Tether provided USDT to Celsius, who sent Bitcoin (BTC) as collateral. Celsius accused Tether of selling the collateralized BTC at a low price and before the set limit. Tether, on the other hand, argued that Celsius was trying to shift the blame for its own financial mismanagement onto them by demanding the return of approximately $2.4 billion worth of BTC (the value at the time of the lawsuit), despite the liquidation being carried out at its direction and with its consent. The contentious case ended with a settlement, with Celsius winning $300 million in its lawsuit against Tether. Tether then agreed to pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate. The payment represents about 7% of the $4.3 billion Celsius initially sought and closes one of the final disputes in the company’s three-year bankruptcy process. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirmed the agreement in a post on X, saying, “Tether is pleased to have reached an agreement on all matters related to the Celsius bankruptcy.” As you may recall, Celsius was one of the companies that went bankrupt in 2022, when many cryptocurrency platforms, from Voyager to 3AC, went bankrupt. *This is not investment advice. Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data! Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/another-crypto-lawsuit-over-tether-to-pay-compensation-to-celsius-in-billion-dollar-bitcoin-btc-case/The post Another Crypto Lawsuit Over: Tether to Pay Compensation to Celsius in Billion Dollar Bitcoin (BTC) Case! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Celsius filed a lawsuit against USDT issuer Tether in 2024, demanding the return of $2.4 billion worth of Bitcoin at the time. The dispute between Celsius and Tether stemmed from a 2022 agreement in which Tether provided USDT to Celsius, who sent Bitcoin (BTC) as collateral. Celsius accused Tether of selling the collateralized BTC at a low price and before the set limit. Tether, on the other hand, argued that Celsius was trying to shift the blame for its own financial mismanagement onto them by demanding the return of approximately $2.4 billion worth of BTC (the value at the time of the lawsuit), despite the liquidation being carried out at its direction and with its consent. The contentious case ended with a settlement, with Celsius winning $300 million in its lawsuit against Tether. Tether then agreed to pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate. The payment represents about 7% of the $4.3 billion Celsius initially sought and closes one of the final disputes in the company’s three-year bankruptcy process. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirmed the agreement in a post on X, saying, “Tether is pleased to have reached an agreement on all matters related to the Celsius bankruptcy.” As you may recall, Celsius was one of the companies that went bankrupt in 2022, when many cryptocurrency platforms, from Voyager to 3AC, went bankrupt. *This is not investment advice. Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data! Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/another-crypto-lawsuit-over-tether-to-pay-compensation-to-celsius-in-billion-dollar-bitcoin-btc-case/

Another Crypto Lawsuit Over: Tether to Pay Compensation to Celsius in Billion Dollar Bitcoin (BTC) Case!

2025/10/15 21:41

Bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Celsius filed a lawsuit against USDT issuer Tether in 2024, demanding the return of $2.4 billion worth of Bitcoin at the time.

The dispute between Celsius and Tether stemmed from a 2022 agreement in which Tether provided USDT to Celsius, who sent Bitcoin (BTC) as collateral.

Celsius accused Tether of selling the collateralized BTC at a low price and before the set limit.

Tether, on the other hand, argued that Celsius was trying to shift the blame for its own financial mismanagement onto them by demanding the return of approximately $2.4 billion worth of BTC (the value at the time of the lawsuit), despite the liquidation being carried out at its direction and with its consent.

The contentious case ended with a settlement, with Celsius winning $300 million in its lawsuit against Tether. Tether then agreed to pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate.

The payment represents about 7% of the $4.3 billion Celsius initially sought and closes one of the final disputes in the company’s three-year bankruptcy process.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirmed the agreement in a post on X, saying, “Tether is pleased to have reached an agreement on all matters related to the Celsius bankruptcy.”

As you may recall, Celsius was one of the companies that went bankrupt in 2022, when many cryptocurrency platforms, from Voyager to 3AC, went bankrupt.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/another-crypto-lawsuit-over-tether-to-pay-compensation-to-celsius-in-billion-dollar-bitcoin-btc-case/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$86,898.9
$86,898.9$86,898.9
-0.14%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41