The post NASA is considering opening up SpaceX's lunar lander contract to other companies due to delays in SpaceX's Starship development appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NASA no longer thinks SpaceX should have dibs and wants companies to compete with it over its contract to put astronauts back on the moon.  NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon, requires a key component known as the Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of SpaceX’s Starship, for which SpaceX holds a weighty contract it won in 2021. Unfortunately, Starship’s development has struggled, plagued by technical hurdles, and NASA seems to have had enough.  SpaceX is in competition for a NASA contract “I’m in the process of opening that contract up,” acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy said on Monday. “We’re going to have a space race in regard to American companies competing to see who can actually get us back to the moon first.” Opening the contract up at this stage would not be necessary under usual circumstances, as the agency’s signature human space exploration program has already advanced. However, the latest development points to mounting concerns within the Trump administration over the leaps China has been making where space travel is concerned.  “I love SpaceX. It’s an amazing company,” Duffy told CNBC. “The problem is they’re behind. They’ve pushed their timelines out, and we’re in a race against China.” What Duffy meant by “opening up” SpaceX’s contract is still unknown, and so is whether he sees a new bidding process or the clawing back of funds.  What all this means is that SpaceX is now hard-pressed to deliver results. Earlier this month, it carried out another largely successful test of its Starship rocket. However, it is still a long way from mastering the many novel technologies that are required to make moon landings a success, especially the ability to refuel Starship while it is in orbit and launch the vehicle roughly a… The post NASA is considering opening up SpaceX's lunar lander contract to other companies due to delays in SpaceX's Starship development appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NASA no longer thinks SpaceX should have dibs and wants companies to compete with it over its contract to put astronauts back on the moon.  NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon, requires a key component known as the Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of SpaceX’s Starship, for which SpaceX holds a weighty contract it won in 2021. Unfortunately, Starship’s development has struggled, plagued by technical hurdles, and NASA seems to have had enough.  SpaceX is in competition for a NASA contract “I’m in the process of opening that contract up,” acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy said on Monday. “We’re going to have a space race in regard to American companies competing to see who can actually get us back to the moon first.” Opening the contract up at this stage would not be necessary under usual circumstances, as the agency’s signature human space exploration program has already advanced. However, the latest development points to mounting concerns within the Trump administration over the leaps China has been making where space travel is concerned.  “I love SpaceX. It’s an amazing company,” Duffy told CNBC. “The problem is they’re behind. They’ve pushed their timelines out, and we’re in a race against China.” What Duffy meant by “opening up” SpaceX’s contract is still unknown, and so is whether he sees a new bidding process or the clawing back of funds.  What all this means is that SpaceX is now hard-pressed to deliver results. Earlier this month, it carried out another largely successful test of its Starship rocket. However, it is still a long way from mastering the many novel technologies that are required to make moon landings a success, especially the ability to refuel Starship while it is in orbit and launch the vehicle roughly a…

NASA is considering opening up SpaceX's lunar lander contract to other companies due to delays in SpaceX's Starship development

NASA no longer thinks SpaceX should have dibs and wants companies to compete with it over its contract to put astronauts back on the moon. 

NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon, requires a key component known as the Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of SpaceX’s Starship, for which SpaceX holds a weighty contract it won in 2021.

Unfortunately, Starship’s development has struggled, plagued by technical hurdles, and NASA seems to have had enough. 

SpaceX is in competition for a NASA contract

“I’m in the process of opening that contract up,” acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy said on Monday. “We’re going to have a space race in regard to American companies competing to see who can actually get us back to the moon first.”

Opening the contract up at this stage would not be necessary under usual circumstances, as the agency’s signature human space exploration program has already advanced. However, the latest development points to mounting concerns within the Trump administration over the leaps China has been making where space travel is concerned. 

“I love SpaceX. It’s an amazing company,” Duffy told CNBC. “The problem is they’re behind. They’ve pushed their timelines out, and we’re in a race against China.”

What Duffy meant by “opening up” SpaceX’s contract is still unknown, and so is whether he sees a new bidding process or the clawing back of funds. 

What all this means is that SpaceX is now hard-pressed to deliver results. Earlier this month, it carried out another largely successful test of its Starship rocket. However, it is still a long way from mastering the many novel technologies that are required to make moon landings a success, especially the ability to refuel Starship while it is in orbit and launch the vehicle roughly a dozen times or more in a row. 

According to Duffy, opening up the SpaceX contract will make sure the US returns to the moon before China. He also anticipates Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin will be involved in the new competition.

NASA’s timeline for the earliest moon mission, known as Artemis II, is next year, and a space lunar landing with SpaceX’s Starship is slated for 2027, but there are doubts the company will have its vehicle ready in time.

SpaceX has problems it needs to solve

NASA’s moon program is an ambitious and complicated endeavor that will rely on a suite of novel rockets and spacecraft that will have to work in tandem to get astronauts to and from the lunar surface safely. 

One of the biggest issues SpaceX needs to address revolves around Starship’s need to be refueled while in orbit. For now, the refueling issue flies under the radar because it’s still far away in the development timeline, and the company has bigger fish to fry right now, like making sure the vehicle works. 

However, the refueling aspect can not be overlooked, as SpaceX has yet to reveal that it has a technology that can pull that off.

Another issue is Starship’s current lackluster performance. In August, Musk on X revealed that the current version of Starship can only carry about 35 tons of cargo into orbit, which is a far cry from the 100 to 150 tons that is being expected and less than SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket.

However, Musk has been promising a Starship that can carry over 100 tons for years, and he has never been one to give up. He has demonstrated this repeatedly and is likely to pull it off again; at least that is what the investors are saying. 

Recall that the Falcon 9 rocket originally had similar issues with its lift capability, which was smaller than it is today, but the company was able to increase it over time, partially by stretching the rocket. 

Musk is certainly convinced that Starship will be able to reach 100 metric tons with the next version.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas – 30 days free access to our trading program

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/nasa-look-for-spacex-alternatives/

Market Opportunity
MemeCore Logo
MemeCore Price(M)
$1.70329
$1.70329$1.70329
+5.87%
USD
MemeCore (M) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

⁉️ Epstein, a convicted pedo, invested in Coinbase

⁉️ Epstein, a convicted pedo, invested in Coinbase

The post ⁉️ Epstein, a convicted pedo, invested in Coinbase appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The latest Epstein Files release has placed a variety of powerful
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 04:07
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Layer Brett Picked As The Best Crypto To Buy Now By Experts Over Pi Coin & VeChain

Layer Brett Picked As The Best Crypto To Buy Now By Experts Over Pi Coin & VeChain

While Pi Coin (PI) and VeChain (VET) have long been part of the conversation, crypto analysts and early-stage investors are […] The post Layer Brett Picked As The Best Crypto To Buy Now By Experts Over Pi Coin & VeChain appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 00:13