The post FTX Was Never Insolvent, Claims SBF appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes SBF claimed that FTX was never insolvent but collapsed due to a liquidity-driven bank run. He said that customers will recover up to 143% of their funds, with 98% already repaid more than owed. Critics dismiss his defense as revisionist, noting that victims were repaid at 2022’s depressed valuations. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the bankrupt FTX exchange, claimed his platform was never truly insolvent but merely caught in a liquidity crunch. In a 14-page document dated Sept. 30, 2025, the former FTX CEO claims that the exchange always had enough assets to repay customers, arguing that the ensuing bankruptcy was triggered by panic withdrawals rather than an actual balance sheet deficit. According to Bankman-Fried, customers will ultimately receive between 119% and 143% of their owed funds, with 98% already repaid 120%. He insists that FTX’s $8 billion customer liabilities “never left,” and that even after covering legal fees of roughly $1 billion, the estate still holds $8 billion in remaining assets. The document states that there were enough assets with FTX to pay the creditors in November 2022, as well as today. [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Recasts the Collapse as a Bank Run Bankman-Fried said that FTX’s downfall was a “classic bank run” driven by panic rather than fraud. He claims that during November 2022, billions in withdrawals flooded the exchange in days, outpacing liquidity but not solvency. The document states that financing and asset sales were underway to restore withdrawals before external lawyers took control and filed for bankruptcy. SBF’s narrative disputes earlier statements from the bankruptcy team that cited multibillion-dollar shortfalls. [SBF says:] Yup. My highest duty was to do right by FTX’s stakeholders: its customers, employees, and investors. In Nov22,… The post FTX Was Never Insolvent, Claims SBF appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes SBF claimed that FTX was never insolvent but collapsed due to a liquidity-driven bank run. He said that customers will recover up to 143% of their funds, with 98% already repaid more than owed. Critics dismiss his defense as revisionist, noting that victims were repaid at 2022’s depressed valuations. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the bankrupt FTX exchange, claimed his platform was never truly insolvent but merely caught in a liquidity crunch. In a 14-page document dated Sept. 30, 2025, the former FTX CEO claims that the exchange always had enough assets to repay customers, arguing that the ensuing bankruptcy was triggered by panic withdrawals rather than an actual balance sheet deficit. According to Bankman-Fried, customers will ultimately receive between 119% and 143% of their owed funds, with 98% already repaid 120%. He insists that FTX’s $8 billion customer liabilities “never left,” and that even after covering legal fees of roughly $1 billion, the estate still holds $8 billion in remaining assets. The document states that there were enough assets with FTX to pay the creditors in November 2022, as well as today. [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Recasts the Collapse as a Bank Run Bankman-Fried said that FTX’s downfall was a “classic bank run” driven by panic rather than fraud. He claims that during November 2022, billions in withdrawals flooded the exchange in days, outpacing liquidity but not solvency. The document states that financing and asset sales were underway to restore withdrawals before external lawyers took control and filed for bankruptcy. SBF’s narrative disputes earlier statements from the bankruptcy team that cited multibillion-dollar shortfalls. [SBF says:] Yup. My highest duty was to do right by FTX’s stakeholders: its customers, employees, and investors. In Nov22,…

FTX Was Never Insolvent, Claims SBF

Key Notes

  • SBF claimed that FTX was never insolvent but collapsed due to a liquidity-driven bank run.
  • He said that customers will recover up to 143% of their funds, with 98% already repaid more than owed.
  • Critics dismiss his defense as revisionist, noting that victims were repaid at 2022’s depressed valuations.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the bankrupt FTX exchange, claimed his platform was never truly insolvent but merely caught in a liquidity crunch.

In a 14-page document dated Sept. 30, 2025, the former FTX CEO claims that the exchange always had enough assets to repay customers, arguing that the ensuing bankruptcy was triggered by panic withdrawals rather than an actual balance sheet deficit.


According to Bankman-Fried, customers will ultimately receive between 119% and 143% of their owed funds, with 98% already repaid 120%. He insists that FTX’s $8 billion customer liabilities “never left,” and that even after covering legal fees of roughly $1 billion, the estate still holds $8 billion in remaining assets.

The document states that there were enough assets with FTX to pay the creditors in November 2022, as well as today.

SBF Recasts the Collapse as a Bank Run

Bankman-Fried said that FTX’s downfall was a “classic bank run” driven by panic rather than fraud. He claims that during November 2022, billions in withdrawals flooded the exchange in days, outpacing liquidity but not solvency.

The document states that financing and asset sales were underway to restore withdrawals before external lawyers took control and filed for bankruptcy. SBF’s narrative disputes earlier statements from the bankruptcy team that cited multibillion-dollar shortfalls.

SBF claims that FTX and Alameda Research’s assets exceeded liabilities through mid-2022 and points to the bankruptcy estate’s own early 2023 filings as evidence that customer claims could have been met without court intervention.

Asset Sales and Value Erosion

The document criticized the bankruptcy administrators for liquidating assets prematurely, including Solana

SOL
$186.4



24h volatility:
3.4%


Market cap:
$102.49 B



Vol. 24h:
$7.74 B

, Sui

SUI
$2.35



24h volatility:
4.8%


Market cap:
$8.50 B



Vol. 24h:
$1.32 B

, and Anthropic that have since skyrocketed. Bankman-Fried alleged that “insider-favored pricing” and high professional fees destroyed value that could have been returned to creditors.

His team estimates that petition-date holdings across FTX and Alameda totaled roughly $136 billion, including major positions in Anthropic ($14.3B), Robinhood ($7.6B), Genesis Digital Assets ($1.2B), and SpaceX ($600M), as well as 58 million SOL, 205,000 BTC

BTC
$109 904



24h volatility:
0.3%


Market cap:
$2.19 T



Vol. 24h:
$67.26 B

, and other large crypto holdings.

The paper also disputed the use of US dollar-based payouts instead of crypto, arguing that compensating creditors in fiat based on November 2022 prices deprived them of the upside from the subsequent bull market.

Critics Reject SBF’s Defense

The crypto community rejected Bankman-Fried’s claims, accusing him of attempting to rewrite history. On-chain investigator ZachXBT noted that customers suffered massive opportunity losses, receiving payouts at depressed 2022 prices rather than current market valuations.

While Bankman-Fried and his team continue to assert that FTX was solvent and mishandled in bankruptcy, the courts have already convicted him on seven counts of fraud. In March 2024, he was sentenced to 25 years in prison and ordered to forfeit $11 billion, a decision he is currently appealing.

next

Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

FTX (FTT) News, Cryptocurrency News, News


A crypto journalist with over 5 years of experience in the industry, Parth has worked with major media outlets in the crypto and finance world, gathering experience and expertise in the space after surviving bear and bull markets over the years. Parth is also an author of 4 self-published books.

Parth Dubey on LinkedIn

Source: https://www.coinspeaker.com/ftx-was-never-insolvent-claims-sbf/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03171
$0.03171$0.03171
-1.79%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

BitcoinWorld Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market The cryptocurrency market is always buzzing with activity, and recent developments surrounding US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have certainly grabbed attention. After a brief period of inflows, these prominent investment vehicles experienced a significant reversal, recording notable Spot Crypto ETF Outflows on September 22. This shift has sparked discussions among investors and analysts alike, prompting a closer look at what drove these movements and their potential implications for the broader digital asset landscape. What Triggered These Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? On September 22, both US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively observed net outflows, effectively ending a two-day streak of positive inflows. This sudden reversal indicates a potential shift in investor sentiment or market dynamics. Understanding the specifics of these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows is crucial for anyone tracking the pulse of the crypto market. Data from Trader T revealed that spot Bitcoin ETFs alone registered total net outflows amounting to $363.17 million. This substantial figure highlights a notable selling pressure across several key funds. Fidelity’s FBTC led the pack with $276.68 million in outflows. Ark Invest’s ARKB followed, seeing $52.30 million depart. Grayscale’s GBTC, a long-standing player, recorded $24.65 million in outflows. VanEck’s HODL also contributed with $9.54 million. Interestingly, BlackRock’s IBIT and several other funds reported zero flows on this particular day, indicating a concentrated selling activity in specific products rather than a market-wide exodus. How Did Ethereum ETFs Respond to the Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The trend of net outflows wasn’t limited to Bitcoin. Spot Ethereum ETFs also faced considerable pressure, collectively experiencing $76.06 million in net outflows during the same period. This indicates a broader market sentiment affecting both major cryptocurrencies. Fidelity’s FETH accounted for $33.12 million of the outflows. Bitwise’s ETHW saw $22.30 million withdrawn. BlackRock’s ETHA registered $15.19 million in outflows. Grayscale’s Mini ETH contributed $5.45 million to the total. These figures underscore that while Bitcoin ETFs saw larger absolute outflows, Ethereum ETFs also experienced a significant cooling of investor interest. Such synchronized movements often suggest overarching market factors rather than isolated fund-specific issues. What Are the Broader Implications of These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The reversal from inflows to substantial Spot Crypto ETF Outflows could signal a few things. It might reflect profit-taking by investors after recent market rallies, or it could indicate a cautious stance due to macroeconomic uncertainties. Moreover, such movements can influence market sentiment, potentially leading to increased volatility in the short term. For investors, monitoring these ETF flows provides valuable insights into institutional and retail sentiment. Significant outflows can sometimes precede price corrections, offering an opportunity for strategic re-evaluation. Conversely, sustained inflows often suggest growing confidence in digital assets. It is important to remember that ETF flows are just one metric among many. A holistic view, considering on-chain data, macroeconomic indicators, and regulatory news, is essential for making informed decisions in the dynamic crypto space. These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows serve as a reminder of the market’s inherent volatility and the need for continuous vigilance. In summary, the recent dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows from US Bitcoin and Ethereum funds mark a notable shift in the investment landscape. While a two-day inflow streak was broken, these movements are a natural part of a maturing market. They highlight the ebb and flow of investor confidence and the dynamic nature of digital asset investments. As the market continues to evolve, keeping a close eye on these ETF trends will remain crucial for understanding broader sentiment and potential future directions. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does “net outflows” mean for crypto ETFs? A1: Net outflows occur when investors redeem more shares from an ETF than they purchase, indicating more money is leaving the fund than entering it. Q2: Which US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw the largest outflows? A2: Fidelity’s FBTC led with $276.68 million in outflows, followed by Ark Invest’s ARKB and Grayscale’s GBTC, contributing significantly to the overall Spot Crypto ETF Outflows. Q3: Were Ethereum ETFs also affected by outflows? A3: Yes, US spot Ethereum ETFs experienced $76.06 million in net outflows, with Fidelity’s FETH and Bitwise’s ETHW being major contributors. Q4: What do these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows suggest about market sentiment? A4: They can suggest a shift towards profit-taking, increased caution due to macroeconomic factors, or a temporary cooling of investor interest in digital assets. Did you find this analysis of Spot Crypto ETF Outflows insightful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the latest trends in the crypto ETF market and contribute to informed discussions! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin and Ethereum institutional adoption. This post Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/23 10:55
Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Besides its enormous presale success, Remittix is also extending a 300% bonus to early purchasers. This temporary bonus can be […] The post Remittix Success Leads
Share
Coindoo2026/02/07 16:39
Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

TLDR Bithumb accidentally sent excess Bitcoin to customers during a promotional “Random Box” event in South Korea Some users reportedly received 2,000 BTC ($139
Share
Coincentral2026/02/07 16:39