The post Wash trading accounts for a quarter of Polymarket’s activity, Columbia study reveals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. About 14% of wallets showed behaviour consistent with coordinated wash trading. Artificial trading peaked at 60% in December 2023 and dropped to 5% by May. ICE plans to invest up to $2 billion as Polymarket prepares for a regulated US return. A new study by Columbia University researchers has found that nearly a quarter of all trading on Polymarket, one of the world’s leading decentralised prediction platforms, has been artificially inflated by wash trading over the past three years. Using blockchain analytics, the researchers traced millions of transactions on the Polygon network and found widespread patterns of self-dealing that misrepresented market depth and liquidity. The findings challenge the perceived transparency of blockchain-based prediction markets and raise deeper questions about how decentralised finance can preserve integrity while operating without traditional oversight mechanisms. Algorithmic analysis exposes trading manipulation The research team analysed millions of wallet transactions recorded on the Polygon blockchain, where all Polymarket activity is publicly verifiable. By designing algorithms to detect repetitive and circular trading patterns, they identified that 14% of the platform’s 1.26 million wallets exhibited behaviour consistent with wash trading. These accounts repeatedly transacted with each other but rarely interacted with the wider market, indicating self-dealing activity rather than genuine speculation. According to the study, wash trading accounted for an average of 25% of total Polymarket transactions since 2021. The frequency of this artificial activity fluctuated over time, peaking at 60% in December 2023 before declining to around 5% in May, only to climb again to roughly 20% by October. The findings illustrate how easily decentralised markets can be manipulated when transaction costs are negligible and identities pseudonymous. The authors, including Columbia Business School professors Yash Kanoria and Hongyao Ma, economist Rajiv Sethi of Barnard College, and doctoral student Allen Sirolly, emphasised that their estimates are not definitive.… The post Wash trading accounts for a quarter of Polymarket’s activity, Columbia study reveals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. About 14% of wallets showed behaviour consistent with coordinated wash trading. Artificial trading peaked at 60% in December 2023 and dropped to 5% by May. ICE plans to invest up to $2 billion as Polymarket prepares for a regulated US return. A new study by Columbia University researchers has found that nearly a quarter of all trading on Polymarket, one of the world’s leading decentralised prediction platforms, has been artificially inflated by wash trading over the past three years. Using blockchain analytics, the researchers traced millions of transactions on the Polygon network and found widespread patterns of self-dealing that misrepresented market depth and liquidity. The findings challenge the perceived transparency of blockchain-based prediction markets and raise deeper questions about how decentralised finance can preserve integrity while operating without traditional oversight mechanisms. Algorithmic analysis exposes trading manipulation The research team analysed millions of wallet transactions recorded on the Polygon blockchain, where all Polymarket activity is publicly verifiable. By designing algorithms to detect repetitive and circular trading patterns, they identified that 14% of the platform’s 1.26 million wallets exhibited behaviour consistent with wash trading. These accounts repeatedly transacted with each other but rarely interacted with the wider market, indicating self-dealing activity rather than genuine speculation. According to the study, wash trading accounted for an average of 25% of total Polymarket transactions since 2021. The frequency of this artificial activity fluctuated over time, peaking at 60% in December 2023 before declining to around 5% in May, only to climb again to roughly 20% by October. The findings illustrate how easily decentralised markets can be manipulated when transaction costs are negligible and identities pseudonymous. The authors, including Columbia Business School professors Yash Kanoria and Hongyao Ma, economist Rajiv Sethi of Barnard College, and doctoral student Allen Sirolly, emphasised that their estimates are not definitive.…

Wash trading accounts for a quarter of Polymarket’s activity, Columbia study reveals

  • About 14% of wallets showed behaviour consistent with coordinated wash trading.
  • Artificial trading peaked at 60% in December 2023 and dropped to 5% by May.
  • ICE plans to invest up to $2 billion as Polymarket prepares for a regulated US return.

A new study by Columbia University researchers has found that nearly a quarter of all trading on Polymarket, one of the world’s leading decentralised prediction platforms, has been artificially inflated by wash trading over the past three years.

Using blockchain analytics, the researchers traced millions of transactions on the Polygon network and found widespread patterns of self-dealing that misrepresented market depth and liquidity.

The findings challenge the perceived transparency of blockchain-based prediction markets and raise deeper questions about how decentralised finance can preserve integrity while operating without traditional oversight mechanisms.

Algorithmic analysis exposes trading manipulation

The research team analysed millions of wallet transactions recorded on the Polygon blockchain, where all Polymarket activity is publicly verifiable.

By designing algorithms to detect repetitive and circular trading patterns, they identified that 14% of the platform’s 1.26 million wallets exhibited behaviour consistent with wash trading.

These accounts repeatedly transacted with each other but rarely interacted with the wider market, indicating self-dealing activity rather than genuine speculation.

According to the study, wash trading accounted for an average of 25% of total Polymarket transactions since 2021.

The frequency of this artificial activity fluctuated over time, peaking at 60% in December 2023 before declining to around 5% in May, only to climb again to roughly 20% by October.

The findings illustrate how easily decentralised markets can be manipulated when transaction costs are negligible and identities pseudonymous.

The authors, including Columbia Business School professors Yash Kanoria and Hongyao Ma, economist Rajiv Sethi of Barnard College, and doctoral student Allen Sirolly, emphasised that their estimates are not definitive.

However, the data suggests a consistent pattern that raises questions about how on-chain markets represent real sentiment and liquidity.

Token speculation may have fuelled artificial activity

While the study did not allege direct involvement by Polymarket itself, it identified structural features that make wash trading possible.

The exchange charges no transaction fees, supports self-custodied crypto wallets, and enables stablecoin settlements, allowing traders to operate multiple pseudonymous accounts without meaningful cost.

The researchers also linked several spikes in artificial volume to rumours of a potential Polymarket token launch.

In decentralised finance, such speculation can drive traders to inflate their activity in hopes of qualifying for “airdrop” rewards when a new token is released.

In early October, Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan posted on social media hinting at a possible token, coinciding with one of the sharp rises in wash trading.

Sirolly noted that authentic trading volumes tended to surge around real-world developments like election polls or sports results, whereas wash trading peaks aligned more closely with token-related rumours.

This suggests that some users were trading not for market insight but for eligibility in prospective reward distributions.

Regulatory context and industry competition

Polymarket, founded in 2020, has become one of the most active blockchain-based prediction platforms, allowing users to bet on political, financial, and cultural outcomes.

Its closest competitor, Kalshi Inc., operates under US regulation but does not run on a blockchain, limiting external scrutiny of its data.

The report’s timing is significant. In 2022, Polymarket reached a $1.4 million settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for operating an unregistered exchange and subsequently barred US users.

Despite regulatory pressure, Polymarket remains attractive to institutional investors.

Intercontinental Exchange Inc., owner of the New York Stock Exchange, recently signalled plans to invest up to $2 billion in the company, underscoring the mainstream financial world’s growing interest in blockchain prediction markets.

Source: https://coinjournal.net/news/wash-trading-accounts-for-a-quarter-of-polymarkets-activity-columbia-study-reveals/

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0.00851
$0.00851$0.00851
+0.11%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Does Market Cap Really Mean in Crypto — and Why Australians Care

What Does Market Cap Really Mean in Crypto — and Why Australians Care

Introduction: What Does Market Cap Mean in Cryptocurrency Ridgewell Tradebit is an automated cryptocurrency trading platform that helps users better understand
Share
Techbullion2026/02/09 23:34
The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The post The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 14: Gianluigi Donnarumma of Manchester City celebrates the second City goal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Manchester United at Etihad Stadium on September 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images) Visionhaus/Getty Images For a goalkeeper who’d played an influential role in the club’s first-ever Champions League triumph, it was strange to see Gianluigi Donnarumma so easily discarded. Soccer is a brutal game, but the sudden, drastic demotion of the Italian from Paris Saint-Germain’s lineup for the UEFA Super Cup clash against Tottenham Hotspur before he was sold to Manchester City was shockingly brutal. Coach Luis Enrique isn’t a man who minces his words, so he was blunt when asked about the decision on social media. “I am supported by my club and we are trying to find the best solution,” he told a news conference. “It is a difficult decision. I only have praise for Donnarumma. He is one of the very best goalkeepers out there and an even better man. “But we were looking for a different profile. It’s very difficult to take these types of decisions.” The last line has really stuck, especially since it became clear that Manchester City was Donnarumma’s next destination. Pep Guardiola, under whom the Italian will be playing this season, is known for brutally axing goalkeepers he didn’t feel fit his profile. The most notorious was Joe Hart, who was jettisoned many years ago for very similar reasons to Enrique. So how can it be that the Catalan coach is turning once again to a so-called old-school keeper? Well, the truth, as so often the case, is not quite that simple. As Italian soccer expert James Horncastle pointed out in The Athletic, Enrique’s focus on needing a “different profile” is overblown. Lucas Chevalier,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:38
DeFi Technologies' Valour Launches New Bitcoin-Collateralized ETP on London Stock Exchange

DeFi Technologies' Valour Launches New Bitcoin-Collateralized ETP on London Stock Exchange

PANews reported on September 19th that, as the UK gradually relaxes restrictions on digital assets, Valour, a subsidiary of DeFi Technologies, launched a Bitcoin-collateralized ETP on the London Stock Exchange, offering investors the opportunity to earn cryptocurrency returns. This Bitcoin-collateralized ETP offers an annual yield of 1.4%, backed by Bitcoin held in cold wallets and secured by multi-party computation (MCP) technology. Currently, this new Bitcoin-collateralized ETP is only available to institutional and professional investors. The UK will allow retail investors to purchase cryptocurrency ETNs again on October 8, lifting a ban in place since 2021. The announcement did not specify how returns will be generated. However, another Bitcoin ETP listed by Valour on a French exchange generates Bitcoin returns by delegating tokens on Core Chain.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 08:09