TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content

2025/12/09 02:21

TLDR

  • ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content.
  • Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam.
  • ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet.
  • Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms.

ZachXBT has sharply criticized major InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps, Galxe, and Layer3 for fueling a rise in AI-driven spam and low-quality content. He claims these platforms, by incentivizing engagement farming, are polluting the ecosystem and undermining genuine discussions. ZachXBT’s critique has sparked a wider debate on the consequences of automated content flooding, with many users calling for reforms to restore authenticity to these platforms.

ZachXBT Criticizes AI-Driven Spam in InfoFi Platforms

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has raised concerns about the growing problem of AI-generated spam in the InfoFi space. In recent social media posts, he targeted several prominent platforms such as Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, and Wallchain. According to ZachXBT, these platforms encourage AI bots to flood feeds with low-value interactions, resulting in what he describes as “ecosystem pollution.”

He pointed out that many of these platforms incentivize users to engage in repetitive, low-quality activity to earn rewards. This, he argues, leads to a flood of AI-generated content that undermines meaningful discussion and harms the credibility of the ecosystem. “All the meta has done is boost AI slop and low-quality content while pretending it brought sticky users to the project,” he wrote in a response to a promotion for Kaito Yaps in July.

AI Bots Overrun Platforms Like Kaito Yaps and Galxe

InfoFi platforms, such as Kaito Yaps and Galxe, have faced scrutiny for their use of AI models to incentivize user engagement. These platforms reward users with tokens for activities like market commentary, predictions, and social media posts. However, critics argue that these reward structures have encouraged the rise of automated bots designed to produce high volumes of low-quality content.

The issue is exacerbated by the engagement-driven systems that prioritize quantity over the quality of user contributions. ZachXBT criticized these platforms for promoting a “game the system” mentality, where bots and coordinated groups flood feeds to maximize rewards. He believes this undermines genuine user interactions and weakens the integrity of discussions.

ZachXBT Launches Bounty for Data Scraping

To bring attention to the issue, ZachXBT has initiated a bounty program. He is offering cash rewards for individuals who can successfully scrape user data from the platforms in question. The aim is to gather data that can expose the scale of AI-driven activity across platforms like Kaito Yaps, Wallchain, Galxe, and Layer3.

On his Telegram channel, ZachXBT posted a bounty of $5,000 for the first person who could compile data sets from the specified platforms. He urged people to collect any available information, including usernames, user IDs, and on-chain addresses. His efforts highlight the growing frustration within the crypto community with the increasing prevalence of automated, low-value content.

Community Pushback Against Engagement Farming

The growing criticism of InfoFi platforms is not limited to ZachXBT. Many users within the crypto community have voiced their frustration with the engagement farming tactics seen on platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe. Some argue that the incentive structures reward users for posting content that adds little value to the discussion.

“Instead of experts, we have an army of mercenaries. Instead of discussions, we have ‘Reply Guys’ on steroids,” said Azel, a community commentator. Many users feel that these platforms have shifted their focus from genuine conversation to artificial metrics that prioritize engagement over substance.

In response to these concerns, some platforms have begun exploring ways to improve the quality of content by reducing the influence of AI bots. Despite these efforts, the ongoing challenge of balancing user engagement with content quality remains a significant issue for the InfoFi space.

The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46