Environmentalists warn that the planned project will add to a 'critical ecological deficit' the province is already facingEnvironmentalists warn that the planned project will add to a 'critical ecological deficit' the province is already facing

Negros Occidental groups press reforestation over capitol’s P1.2-B bulk water project

2025/12/10 15:55

NEGROS OCCIDENTAL, Philippines – Environmental watchdogs and residents have called on the provincial government to prioritize reforestation over a planned P1.2-billion bulk water project, citing concerns over environmental impact, water security, and long-term sustainability.

The project is designed to have a capacity of 34.5 million liters per day (MLD), with surface water to be drawn from the Imbang and Malogo rivers in Silay and EB Magalona, respectively. 

Potable water would then be supplied to Manapla, EB Magalona, and the cities of Victorias, Silay, Talisay, Bago, and Bacolod via their respective water districts. 

The provincial government said the project aims to ensure water security amid a projected province-wide water crisis in the next 20 years.

However, environmental groups warn that water scarcity could worsen if forest cover in the North Negros Natural Park (NNNP), the largest watershed in northern Negros Occidental, continues to decline due to unregulated upland developments. 

Both Green Alert Network (GAN) and the Group of Environmental Socialists (GOES) acknowledged that the proposed Negros Occidental Bulk Water Project (NOBWP) has both advantages and disadvantages. 

Randy James Rojo, GOES co-founder, said Negros Occidental Governor Eugenio Jose Lacson should confront the depleting forests not only at NNNP but also at Mt. Kanlaon Natural Park (MKNP) in southern Negros.

Pushing for the NOBWP, Rojo said, will add to a “critical ecological deficit” the province is already facing. 

Rusty Biñas, founder of GAN, said combining NNNP and MKNP, the province has a forest deficit of about 480,000 hectares.

“The choice is stark, and a bulk water project is nothing more than a commitment to finance our own future. Who will go first, the horse of watershed protection or the cart of water distribution? The answer is both, but only if the horse is made whole, strong, and publicly controlled,” Biñas said.

Catholic priest Reverend Father Ernie Larida of EB Magalona, who is leading a group in opposing the plan called the provincial government’s presentation during a public consultation in Barangay Guimbala-on, Silay, on December 3, “half-cooked,” and said it failed to address residents’ “fears and worries.”

“If the province is talking about a water crisis, so, why would the bulk water project only serve the six [localities]? What will happen to 26 other towns and cities in the province?” Larida asked.

He added that the Imbang and Malogo rivers are smaller than Bago River in Bago City, Himoga-an River in Sagay City, Binalbagan River in Binalbagan, and Ilog-Hilabangan River in Ilog and Kabankalan City.

Larida’s group reported low water levels in the Imbang and nearby Nahalinan River during the last El Niño and feared these could worsen with the bulk water project. 

“I am not doing this because I am a priest. I am doing this because I am a resident of Guimbala-on. My parents are still there. My siblings are still there. My relatives are still there,” he told Rappler on Tuesday, December 9.

The provincial government said it is conducting watershed rehabilitation in Talisay and is willing to fund the establishment of an Imbang Watershed Council and its management plan. It also said small water-impounding facilities could be built to support downstream farmers.

Larida’s group has sought detailed engineering plans for the NOBWP, and questioned its sustainability after 17 private firms reportedly backed out from bidding. 

Officials said public consultations will continue in four other barangays of Silay before moving to EB Magalona. Silay officials, led by Mayor Joedith Gallego and Vice Mayor Tom Ledesman, have openly opposed the project. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
B Logo
B Price(B)
$0.23091
$0.23091$0.23091
-1.58%
USD
B (B) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflo
Share
Coindesk2025/12/16 19:01