The post OpenAI is the root cause of all of Oracle’s problems appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Oracle is locked into heavy dependence on OpenAI, and that dependenceThe post OpenAI is the root cause of all of Oracle’s problems appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Oracle is locked into heavy dependence on OpenAI, and that dependence

OpenAI is the root cause of all of Oracle’s problems

2025/12/11 20:33

Oracle is locked into heavy dependence on OpenAI, and that dependence is driving every problem the company is dealing with right now.

The company spent five decades building a huge base of enterprise clients, yet its fate has never been tied to a single customer the way it is today.

That shift happened after Oracle agreed to provide $300 billion in AI-computing services to OpenAI, alongside a list of other large deals OpenAI signed, even though it brings in less than $20 billion a year.

Three months later, every part of Larry El’s business is being judged through that one relationship.

The pressure grew after Google launched Gemini 3 last month. The model outperformed the latest version of ChatGPT, and it forced OpenAI leadership to issue what they called a “code red.”

Because OpenAI is a private company, investors have shown their concern by selling shares of companies most exposed to it. Oracle ended up being one of the biggest casualties. Its stock fell 32% over the last three months leading up to its fiscal second-quarter report.

That performance ranked as the third-worst on the S&P 500 at a time Oracle was nearing a $1 trillion valuation based on expectations that AI demand would double the company’s size.

Oracle absorbs rising costs as capex explodes

Oracle reported 14% revenue growth year over year in its latest quarter, its strongest rate in almost three years. The number still came in a bit below Wall Street expectations.

Oracle also added about $68 billion to its revenue backlog through new deals with Meta and Nvidia, though the company had already mentioned those deals during an October analyst meeting. The actual surprise came from spending. Oracle disclosed a record $12 billion in capital expenditures for the quarter ending in November, well above the $8.4 billion analysts expected.

The company raised its full-year capex forecast from $35 billion to $50 billion, which sent its stock down another 12% in after-hours trading.

A capex bill of that size represents 75% of Oracle’s projected revenue for the year. Over the past five years, the company averaged about 17%.

By comparison, Meta is expected to spend roughly 36% of its revenue on capex this year. The numbers show how much strain Oracle is taking on while trying to supply OpenAI and maintain the rest of its cloud clients.

Oracle carries massive obligations tied to OpenAI

Oracle’s spending is tied to more than data-center growth. OpenAI represents the majority of the company’s $523 billion in remaining performance obligations. These obligations are contracts for revenue that have not yet been recognized.

The total is nearly nine times the size of Oracle’s annual revenue. Cloud rivals like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google sit at far lower ratios. Microsoft, which is OpenAI’s primary computing partner, carries a backlog only about 1.4 times its revenue over the last four quarters.

Oracle’s future growth depends on OpenAI meeting those commitments. But few companies can take on deals at this scale, leaving Oracle with limited paths to diversify. The stability of those obligations also depends on the direction of AI demand and whether competitors like Google or Anthropic keep reducing OpenAI’s lead.

Gil Luria of D.A. Davidson said Oracle needed to use its quarterly report “to address concerns about the tricky balance of borrowing money to build out capacity for OpenAI, with the new understanding there is very low likelihood OpenAI will live up to its obligations.”

Oracle did not provide that clarity. The company burned a little more than $13 billion in cash over the last four quarters and now holds about $88 billion in net debt.

That stands in sharp contrast to rivals with large net-cash positions. Moody’s said last week that “Oracle has the highest exposure to OpenAI and has the weakest credit metrics among investment-grade hyperscalers.”

Oracle said Wednesday that it intends to protect its investment-grade rating as it finances its AI expansion, but investors are showing clear signs of frustration as the financial pressure keeps building.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/openai-root-cause-of-all-of-oracles-problems/

Market Opportunity
The Root Network Logo
The Root Network Price(ROOT)
$0.000276
$0.000276$0.000276
+4.15%
USD
The Root Network (ROOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41