An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract,

Auditors flag P290-M Clark air traffic control tower project delays, cost overruns

2025/12/12 09:14

MANILA, Philippines – State auditors flagged the P290.3-million New Clark Air Traffic Control Tower project, awarded in January 2021 and expected to be completed within a year, saying it remains unfinished with no target turnover date.

The 2024 audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation (CIAC) showed the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, but was only 91% complete as of 2024. Costs had also risen 22% to P354.41 million.

Auditors attributed the delays to weak procurement planning, poor project monitoring and possible shortcomings in the contractor’s capacity. They also noted the project broke ground without the required building, electronic, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and sanitary permits from the Clark Development Corporation, the regulator for the Clark Freeport Zone.

Auditors stressed that building permits are mandatory under the National Building Code, with violations carrying fines of up to P20,000 or jail terms of up to two years.

“It was only on April 29, 2024 that CIAC was able to secure the necessary permits from the CDC. The absence of necessary permits during the construction period raises serious concerns regarding regulatory compliance, project authorization, and risk management,” the report read in part.

Auditors said the missing permits reflected poorly on the contractor’s ability to plan and questioned why construction continued for years without them.

“Securing permits is a fundamental requirement in the construction industry, and failure to do so casts doubt on the contractor’s capability to manage regulatory requirements effectively. This oversight not only hindered the project’s progress but also highlighted deficiencies in due diligence and adherence to standard construction protocols,” the report added.

State auditors said CIAC management failed to intervene early, allowing procedural violations to persist.

The contractor sought a suspension of the height clearance limit on March 17, 2022 – two months after the original January 2022 completion date – after the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) denied permits for the tower and tower crane for exceeding allowable height. The control tower’s proposed top elevation was 228.81 meters, compared with CAAP’s 192-meter limit, a 36.81-meter excess.

The report noted that the approval of the Final Aeronautical Study and the redesign of the 4-Instrument Flight Procedures remained pending.

With shortening the tower out of the question, CAAP required an aeronautical study for a height clearance exemption. COA said the study assessed deviations from aerodrome standards, proposed safety measures, and recommended procedures to offset the deviation.

The contractor commissioned an international firm in 2023 to conduct the three-month study, costing P3.9 million. A portion of the findings stressed that “considering the existing defenses and proposed mitigation measures, the risks associated with the new control tower in its final situation are deemed acceptable.”

The results, along with a new Height Clearance Permit application, were submitted to CAAP on October 11, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, the permit had not been issued.

“Further verification revealed that CAAP requires additional documentation to support the aeronautical study report,” the audit showed.

Auditors also found the installed elevators did not match the specified brand in the paid progress billings. While the project listed a German-made Schneider elevator, inspection revealed a different brand.

They said, “According to the approved Bill of Quantities, the contracted brand was Schneider, a German brand. However, during an inspection conducted on March 20, 2025, the installed elevator was identified as Global Fuji, a Chinese brand. A review of records confirmed that this substitution was approved by the then president and chief executive officer of CIAC.” – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
MemeCore Logo
MemeCore Price(M)
$1.6235
$1.6235$1.6235
-1.29%
USD
MemeCore (M) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto casino Luck.io is reportedly paying influencers six figures a month to promote its services, a June 18 X post from popular crypto trader Jordan Fish, aka Cobie, shows. Crypto Influencers Reportedly Earning Six Figures Monthly According to a screenshot of messages between Cobie and an unidentified source embedded in the Wednesday post, the anonymous messenger confirmed that the crypto company pays influencers “around” $500,000 per month to promote the casino. They’re paying extremely well (6 fig per month) pic.twitter.com/AKRVKU9vp4 — Cobie (@cobie) June 18, 2025 However, not everyone was as convinced of the number’s accuracy. “That’s only for Faze Banks probably,” one user replied. “Other influencers are getting $20-40k per month. So, same as other online crypto casinos.” Cobie pushed back on the user’s claims by identifying the messenger as “a crypto person,” going on to state that he knew of “4 other crypto people” earning “above 200k” from Luck.io. Drake’s Massive Stake.com Deal Cobie’s post comes amid growing speculation over celebrity and influencer collaborations with crypto casinos globally. Aubrey Graham, better known as Toronto-based rapper Drake, is reported to make nearly $100 million every year from his partnership with cryptocurrency casino Stake.com. As part of his deal with the Curaçao-based digital casino, the “Nokia” rapper occasionally hosts live-stream gambling sessions for his more than 140 million Instagram followers. Founded by entrepreneurs Ed Craven and Bijan Therani in 2017, the organization allegedly raked in $2.6 billion in 2022. Stake.com has even solidified key partnerships with Alfa Romeo’s F1 team and Liverpool-based Everton Football Club. However, concerns remain over crypto casinos’ legality as a whole , given their massive accessibility and reach online. Earlier this year, Stake was slapped with litigation out of Illinois for supposedly running an illegal online casino stateside while causing “severe harm to vulnerable populations.” “Stake floods social media platforms with slick ads, influencer videos, and flashy visuals, making its games seem safe, fun, and harmless,” the lawsuit claims. “By masking its real-money gambling platform as just another “social casino,” Stake creates exactly the kind of dangerous environment that Illinois gambling laws were designed to stop.”
Share
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:53
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55