‘We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back,’ says UP coach Goldwin Monteverde as the Maroons ‘We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back,’ says UP coach Goldwin Monteverde as the Maroons

It can’t all be Harold: UP coach calls for more contributions in Game 2

2025/12/12 10:30

MANILA, Philippines – UP rode Harold Alarcon’s heroics in Game 1. They are not betting the season on that again in Game 2. 

After their 74-70 loss to La Salle, UP head coach Goldwin Monteverde challenged his crew to step up and spread the scoring in the do-or-die Game 2 for the Fighting Maroons. 

“Whatever Harold did for us for this game, we need that. It’s just that as a team, they need to contribute. It’s not just him,” Monteverde said in Filipino, following Alarcon’s 34-point explosion that went for naught in Game 1. 

“I think the 34 points, of course, the team needs it. But it’s not just Harold who would win these finals for us. It should take a team to be able to overcome whatever we’re facing in terms of offense,” he added. 

Alarcon went 12-of-22 from the field and 10-of-17 inside the arc, while the rest of the defending champions combined for just 16-of-41 in the Game 1 loss.

He also dropped 20 in the first half, added 6 in the third, and tacked on 8 more in the fourth. The rest of the UP squad mustered only 4 points in the final frame as La Salle ran away with a 21 -12 closing burst.

Aside from Alarcon, only Francis Nnoruka cracked double digits for UP, delivering 13 points on 6-of-8 shooting and grabbing 6 boards.

Having been outplayed by La Salle down the stretch, Monteverde said his players need to prove they want it more every time they step on the floor.

“For me, every finals game, we should want it more, especially on the defensive end. We need to be stronger,” Monteverde said. “We need to toughen up even on offensive rebounding and stuff. I believe that there were certain parts of the game that we played well, but then we just need to be consistent about what we’re doing on both ends.”

This is UP’s fifth straight UAAP finals appearance under Monteverde, who took over the head coaching post in Season 84, the season they broke their 36-year title drought. 

Season 88’s finals also marked the third consecutive year La Salle and UP faced off in the men’s basketball finals. 

Still having some of the players from his first season as UP coach — including Alarcon, Terrence Fortea, and Gerry Abadiano —  Monteverde kept his full trust in the Fighting Maroons’ chances to go back-to-back this year. 

“So far, I’m confident. I really trust the team that they will bounce back from this. Learn from this, definitely. We’re still positive,” he said. 

UP won Game 1 of the past two season finales against La Salle. In Season 86, the Fighting Maroons succumbed to the then-Kevin Quiambao-led Green Archers before completing their redemption bid in Season 87. 

Earlier this season, the Fighting Maroons also started on the wrong foot, going 0-2 to start the tournament before rising to the second seed after the elimination round. 

Banking on UP’s resilience, Monteverde vowed to roll out key adjustments for Sunday’s Game 2 at the Mall of Asia Arena.

“It’s important for us in every game that everyone is going to the game ready. Whatever we face, we’ll fight for it. So, adjustment will come in the second game,” he said.

“This is not the first time we lost…We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back. We just lost a battle, but the war is not over yet. We still have two games left.” – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.00944
$0.00944$0.00944
-2.78%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflo
Share
Coindesk2025/12/16 19:01