The fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturingThe fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturing

Intel has tested chipmaking tools from firm with sanctioned China unit, sources say

2025/12/12 15:43

Chipmaker Intel has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.

Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have supported the Chinese government’s efforts at harnessing commercial technology for military use and making advanced chips or chipmaking tools. ACM denies the allegations.

The two so-called wet etch tools, used for removing material from the silicon wafers that are transformed into semiconductors, were tested for possible use in Intel’s most advanced chipmaking process, known as 14A. That process is due for an initial launch in 2027.

Reuters could not determine if Intel had made a decision to add the tools to the advanced chipmaking process and has no evidence that the company violated any US regulations. ACM said it could not comment on “specific customer engagements,” but can confirm that “ACMR’s US team has sold and delivered multiple tools from our Asian operations to domestic customers.” It also said it has disclosed the shipment of three tools to a “major US-based semiconductor manufacturer,” which are being tested and some of which have met performance standards.

But the fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturing line, raises important national security concerns, China hawks said. They flagged the possible transfer of Intel’s sensitive technological know-how to China, the eventual displacement of trusted Western tool suppliers with China-linked firms and even the potential for sabotage efforts by Beijing.

Faced with Beijing’s imposition of export controls on rare earth minerals, US President Donald Trump has backed off most hardline policies on chip exports to China and on Monday gave the green light for Nvidia to sell its second most advanced AI chips in China.

But as Chinese toolmakers begin to make incursions into the global marketplace, concern is growing among lawmakers of both parties, who earlier this month reintroduced legislation to bar chipmakers that have received billions in US government subsidies from using Chinese equipment as part of their government-backed expansion plans.

Intel’s testing of ACM tools “highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies and should not be permitted,” said Chris McGuire, a former White House National Security Council official under President Joe Biden and Senior Fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, in response to Reuters’ findings.

“Chinese tools could easily be remotely or physically manipulated by Beijing to degrade or even halt U.S. chip production. And US companies should play no part in helping China improve its chipmaking tools, which are the foundation of all advanced technology development,” he added.

ACM said it does not pose a national security threat, noting that its US operations are “bifurcated and isolated” from the sanctioned Shanghai-based unit, and that US customers are supported directly by U.S. personnel, with robust safeguards to protect customer trade secrets.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not address the specific concerns cited by China hawks but said “Normal trade and economic cooperation between companies should not be politicized. We urge certain individuals in the U.S. to abandon ideological biases and stop generalizing the concept of national security.”

ACM has longstanding China ties

ACM Research was founded in 1998 by David Wang, who still serves as CEO and owns over 57% of the company’s voting shares. ACM’s Chinese-language website lists Wang as an American citizen with Chinese permanent residence.

ACM also sells equipment to sanctioned Chinese chipmaker YMTC as well as China’s CXMT, which was named by the Defense Department as a Chinese military-backed company, according to a recent presentation on its website. SMIC, another ACM customer targeted by US sanctions over alleged ties to the Chinese military industrial complex, accounts for 14% of ACM’s sales, the company says.

While the company is headquartered in California, most of the company’s research and development take place in China, where ACM established its Shanghai-based R&D facility in 2006 according to a May 2025 investor presentation. “ACM now has complete R&D, engineering and manufacturing operations at its Zhangjiang High-Tech Park facility in Shanghai, China,” ACM’s website says.

Big hub in Oregon’s ‘silicon forest’

In November 2023, ACM announced the opening of a new facility in Hillsboro, Oregon- an area nicknamed the state’s Silicon Forest- “strategically located near key customers and partners” to serve as the company’s new sales and service hub.

The building is about a mile from Intel’s flagship R&D and early-stage manufacturing plant and there are no other cutting-edge chip factories in the state.

A January report by US-based hedge fund Kerrisdale Capital said the facility was aimed at supporting ACM’s relationship with Intel, noting that ACM qualified a new tool there in late 2023, and delivered additional tools in mid-2024.

ACM “has laid the foundation for expansion outside China through strategic engagements with global leaders such as Intel” which could bear fruit in 2026, Kerrisdale said in a follow-up report released last month. The toolmaker has “active tool evaluations across a range of cleaning process steps” at Intel and the firm is “upgrading its customer demonstration lab and local R&D capabilities there to enable Intel to run wafers locally on ACMR tools,” it added.

Intel did not respond to a request for comment on the report. ACM said it is not a significant supplier of equipment to any major U.S. chipmaker.

China’s push for global market share

ACM is still a small player on the global stage, ranking 24th in the global semiconductor equipment market with an 8% share of the segment for cleaning tools, according to Gartner Research.

But Beijing has been striving since at least 2015 to build a competitive domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry, long before Washington began restricting Chinese access to U.S. tools, the House Select Committee on China said in an October report, citing gains in global market share for Chinese toolmakers.

The committee “has even reviewed with concern reports that ACM Research…has sold (semiconductor manufacturing equipment) to a semiconductor manufacturer with US operations that also formally certified ACM Research’s tools for use in its production line,” the report adds, without further detail.

Ti ools from ACM and Chinese counterparts are 20% to 30% cheaper than those made by rivals like Applied Materials and Lam, according to Dan Hutcheson, Vice Chair of TechInsights Inc, creating a downward price pressure on more established competitors. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Factor Logo
Factor Price(FACT)
$1.24
$1.24$1.24
+1.63%
USD
Factor (FACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Share
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00