South Africa’s Communications Minister Solly Malatsi has issued a policy that requires the country’s telecom regulator to accept equity equivalent investment programsSouth Africa’s Communications Minister Solly Malatsi has issued a policy that requires the country’s telecom regulator to accept equity equivalent investment programs

South Africa eases stance as Musk pushes Starlink rollout

2025/12/13 18:45

South Africa’s Communications Minister Solly Malatsi has issued a policy that requires the country’s telecom regulator to accept equity equivalent investment programs as alternatives to the 30% Black ownership requirement.

Malatsi’s policy received over 19,000 public submissions and approximately 90% of those were in support of the approach which disproves the idea that the policy especially favors Elon Musk and his company. 

South African Communications Minister Solly Malatsi has finalized a controversial policy directive published on Friday that instructs the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa to align its ownership regulations with the national empowerment framework by recognizing equity equivalent investment programs.

Starlink has been unable to launch in South Africa for years because the current ICASA rules require telecommunications companies to sell 30% of their equity to historically disadvantaged individuals. Starlink has consistently refused, stating it does not sell equity in any market where it operates.

But now under the new directive, multinational companies that cannot sell equity due to global shareholding structures can instead make substantial investments in local development programs. These equity equivalent investment programs must be worth either 30% of the company’s South African operations value or 4% of annual local revenue. The programs require approval and monitoring by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition.

According to the department, more than 19,000 submissions were received during the public comment period, with only about 15,000 being substantial. Approximately 90% of submissions supported the EEIP proposals. 

The policy directive clarifies that ICASA participated in developing the ICT sector empowerment code and that all government organs must apply it. It also states that ICASA’s decision to exclude large portions of the code from its regulations, including provisions for equity equivalents, is not legally permissible.

Malatsi stressed that the directive applies equally to all telecommunications companies, which satisfies telecoms operators like Vodacom and MTN. The companies argued that existing licensees should have the same options as new ones. 

Starlink has already outlined plans to invest nearly R2 billion in South Africa. The company proposed investing R500 million to connect approximately 5,000 schools to high-speed internet, benefiting about 2.4 million students. 

Ryan Goodnight, Starlink’s Senior Director of Market Access, has stated the company will partner with local internet service providers to install and maintain infrastructure using an open-access model. The company has also pledged to establish a Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment-compliant South African subsidiary. 

Before Starlink can operate, ICASA must still go through a formal process involving public consultations, regulatory hearings, and legal finalization to amend its ownership regulations. 

Telecommunications expert Dominic Cull has warned that even with political support, the full regulatory amendment process could take 12 to 18 months or longer. The Department of Communications and Digital Technologies aims to finalize the EEIP policy by March 2026, and some experts predict Starlink may not launch in South Africa until late 2027.

In May 2025, ICASA announced investigations into South Africans engaging in unauthorized Starlink use through equipment obtained from international sources. 

The Economic Freedom Fighters and some civil society groups have strongly criticized the policy. They argue it allows foreign companies to avoid meaningful transformation and undermines the spirit of Black Economic Empowerment. The EFF has threatened legal challenges if the policy is implemented.

More than 20% of South Africa’s population still does not actively use the internet despite widespread mobile network coverage. Affordability remains the primary barrier, along with device costs. Minister Malatsi has argued that the deployment limits for fiber infrastructure in remote regions have been met, and therefore, satellite technology is essential for achieving universal connectivity goals.

Minister Malatsi defended against accusations that the policy favors Starlink specifically clarifying that no exemptions have been granted exclusively to any company, as other multinationals like Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and JP Morgan already use EEIPs in South Africa in other sectors.

Amazon’s Project Kuiper and Eutelsat OneWeb are also considering entering into the South African market, and if they or other companies are willing to compromise on ownership requirements and accept the 30% equity rule, they may reach the market first despite Starlink’s stronger brand and larger operational capabilities.

The regulatory changes, if fully implemented, would establish South Africa as taking a different approach than some African neighbors. Countries like Kenya, Rwanda, and Nigeria have adopted more flexible regulatory frameworks that have attracted digital technology investment more quickly. South African policymakers worry about losing competitiveness if their regulatory environment is perceived as unnecessarily restrictive.

Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts

Market Opportunity
BLACKHOLE Logo
BLACKHOLE Price(BLACK)
$0.06405
$0.06405$0.06405
-4.61%
USD
BLACKHOLE (BLACK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41