The post Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin Rewards? 125 Crypto Groups Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The post Are Banks Trying to Kill StablecoinThe post Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin Rewards? 125 Crypto Groups Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The post Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin

Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin Rewards? 125 Crypto Groups Push Back

The post Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin Rewards? 125 Crypto Groups Push Back appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

A new policy fight is taking shape in Washington.

More than 125 crypto and fintech organizations, led by the Blockchain Association, have urged the U.S. Senate Banking Committee to reject efforts that would expand restrictions on stablecoin rewards under the GENIUS Act. The group warns that broadening the rules would hurt consumers, slow innovation, and give traditional banks an unfair edge.

The letter was sent this week to Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, pushing back against proposals that seek to reinterpret the law’s ban on stablecoin “interest or yield.”

What the GENIUS Act Allows and What It Doesn’t

The GENIUS Act clearly prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest to token holders. But according to the coalition, Congress intentionally allowed platforms and third parties to offer lawful rewards and incentives.

“That distinction was not accidental,” the letter states, arguing that expanding the ban would “reopen a settled issue” and disrupt a carefully negotiated compromise.

Crypto groups say this is a fundamental change to how stablecoins can compete in payments.

Banks Warn of Deposit Risk – Crypto Pushes Back

Banking groups have argued that stablecoin rewards could drain deposits from the banking system and hurt lending, especially at community banks. Some estimates have projected potential deposit outflows of up to $6.6 trillion.

The coalition disputes those claims, pointing to a Charles River Associates study that found no evidence of disproportionate deposit outflows from community banks between 2019 and 2025.

They also note that banks currently hold about $2.9 trillion in reserves earning interest at the Federal Reserve, raising questions about whether deposit constraints are the real issue.

Why Stablecoin Rewards Matter Now

With average checking account yields near 0.07% and savings accounts around 0.40%, the coalition argues that stablecoin rewards help platforms share value directly with users, especially in a higher-rate environment.

The group also warned that reopening the issue before GENIUS rules are even written could undermine confidence in crypto regulation.

This is an important fight for the industry. Stay tuned to Coinpedia for what’s next

Source: https://coinpedia.org/news/are-banks-trying-to-kill-stablecoin-rewards-125-crypto-groups-push-back/

Market Opportunity
EPNS Logo
EPNS Price(PUSH)
$0.011854
$0.011854$0.011854
+0.31%
USD
EPNS (PUSH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

The post Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy CEO Phong Le will join
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:48
Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

The White House reportedly took the lead during the latest Crypto Council meeting, narrowing the stablecoin rewards dispute that has delayed progress in the long
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/21 15:30
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28