Television networks and publishing houses across Europe are staring down a rough 2026. New technology is changing everything, and advertising money is drying upTelevision networks and publishing houses across Europe are staring down a rough 2026. New technology is changing everything, and advertising money is drying up

Europe’s media firms brace for tough 2026 as ads fade and AI disrupts

Television networks and publishing houses across Europe are staring down a rough 2026. New technology is changing everything, and advertising money is drying up.

The numbers don’t look good. Media and entertainment companies are expected to grow earnings by 6.9% next year. The broader market? Projected to hit 10% growth.

Tom Ward at Bloomberg Intelligence says advertising problems and artificial intelligence uncertainty aren’t going anywhere. Stock prices in the sector already took a beating in 2025.

Trade disputes and political mess have made European businesses nervous. Advertising budgets get cut first when companies worry about the future. Media firms that depend on ad revenue are feeling the squeeze.

There’s a direct link between ad spending and economic confidence, Ward says. When things look bad, businesses pull back on campaigns.

The damage is real. In October, advertising giant WPP Plc slashed its outlook. It has seen a 60% drop this year, as reported by Cryptopolitan previously. Clients were leaving, and demand evaporated. A month later, British broadcaster ITV Plc said anxiety over the UK budget crushed advertising demand. The company needs to find £35 million ($47 million) in savings to offset lost revenue.

TV networks saw ad sales drop by mid-single-digit percentages on average last year, according to Ward’s calculations. When will it turn around? Nobody knows.

Advertising troubles are just part of the story

Artificial intelligence has become another big worry. Silvia Cuneo from Deutsche Bank AG says AI emerged as a new threat right when trade issues seemed to be settling down.

Companies like Informa Plc and online platforms Rightmove Plc and Scout24 SE are caught in the middle. AI could make their tools more efficient and create new revenue. But it could also replace their main products and wipe out entire parts of their business.

Some areas face more risk. John Davies at Bloomberg Intelligence points to Pearson Plc’s digital college courses as particularly vulnerable. Academic publishers like Springer Nature AG & Co KGaA have another problem. Cuts to US research funding hurt them because they make significant money from academic journals.

Not everyone thinks AI is such a big threat. Daniel Kerven and Lara Simpson at JPMorgan Chase & Co. say the fears are overblown. They expect a “more nuanced” market response this year.

Companies that don’t adapt will struggle

The situation is still changing, Cuneo notes. It could take years to understand AI’s real impact across different sectors. Companies that started early will win. The ones treating AI as both opportunity and risk.

Scout24, a German property website, is doing it right. The company built AI tools for real estate agents to create listings and improve photos. These features let Scout24 charge more for business services, says Doyinsola Sanyaolu at Citigroup Inc. The company’s data also creates partnership possibilities with AI language model providers. Sanyaolu calls Scout24 “among the most innovative” in the space.

Investor confidence will probably stay low this year while everyone watches how AI plays out for these companies. Economic conditions remain weak, Cuneo says, and AI disruption keeps dominating the conversation.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03845
$0.03845$0.03845
+3.19%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58