Deloitte warns that T+0 and tokenized securities could boost speed and collateral efficiency while creating a dangerous blind spot if reporting and oversight lagDeloitte warns that T+0 and tokenized securities could boost speed and collateral efficiency while creating a dangerous blind spot if reporting and oversight lag

Deloitte warns that tokenized markets face make‑or‑break test as T+0 settlement goes live

2026/01/26 21:09
4 min read

Deloitte warns that T+0 and tokenized securities could boost speed and collateral efficiency while creating a dangerous blind spot if reporting and oversight lag.

Summary
  • Deloitte’s 2026 outlook flags same‑day T+0 settlement and tokenized securities as key experiments, likely starting in limited pilots rather than a full market overhaul.
  • Faster settlement shrinks time to source cash, fix errors, and manage margin, raising liquidity and operational risk if paired with reduced reporting and fragmented liquidity.
  • Tokenized collateral and stablecoins are early targets, with the CFTC and SEC using no‑action relief for pilots while Deloitte urges strong compliance, audit trails, and cyber controls.

Deloitte has identified potential risks in the financial industry’s shift toward same-day settlement and tokenized securities, warning that accelerated trading timelines combined with reduced reporting requirements could create dangerous gaps in market oversight, according to the firm’s 2026 outlook report.

Deliotte offers warnings with respect to T+0 settlements

The report highlights T+0 settlement, which allows trades to settle on the same day they occur, as a major development for 2026. Deloitte noted that regulators are signaling interest in streamlining rules and creating pathways for blockchain-based products, including tokenized securities and stablecoins.

Tokenized securities are traditional assets such as bonds or stocks represented in digital form that can be transferred on blockchain infrastructure. The technology promises fewer intermediaries, faster asset and cash movement, and improved record-keeping, according to the report.

Roy Ben-Hur, managing director at Deloitte & Touche LLP, and Meghan Burns, manager at the firm, told CryptoSlate that the most realistic implementation path involves contained pilot programs rather than a complete market overhaul.

“Signals point towards initial market experimentation via pilots rather than a full market shift,” the executives stated.

The accelerated settlement timeline reduces the window available to correct errors, source cash, locate securities, or manage margin calls, according to Deloitte. While faster settlement may reduce counterparty exposure risks, it could increase operational failures and sudden liquidity pressures, the report stated.

Deloitte connected these developments to broader 2026 market structure changes, including the expected conclusion of the cash portion of the U.S. Treasury central clearing initiative and anticipated Securities and Exchange Commission proposals to modify Regulation NMS.

The firm identified collateral workflows as an area likely to see early adoption of tokenized assets. Ben-Hur and Burns noted that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is exploring stablecoins and tokenized collateral for use cases involving instant settlement in liquid, dollar-linked assets.

“The intra-day nature of collateral commitments makes it an attractive use case for an asset with these features and liquidity commitments. Custody and clearing will help it to scale,” the executives stated.

The report indicated that faster settlement could enable new market entrants and increased competition, potentially creating additional venues for order routing and execution.

Deloitte noted that the SEC has primarily used no-action letters and staff guidance to enable tokenization progress. No-action letters allow market practices to proceed without full rulemaking processes, provided they operate within established parameters.

“In this context, it is a powerful tool to quickly enable changes in industry practice or available marketplace offerings, and we are seeing this already with approvals the SEC has granted recently,” Ben-Hur and Burns stated.

The transition period may create a market environment where tokenized and non-tokenized versions of the same asset coexist, raising questions about pricing, liquidity concentration, and order routing, according to the executives.

Deloitte warned that efforts to reduce reporting burdens could increase market opacity, creating what the firm characterized as a dangerous combination when paired with faster settlement speeds. The compressed timeline reduces the window available to detect manipulation, reconcile discrepancies, and respond to market stress, the report stated.

The firm recommended that companies implement streamlined reporting systems that maintain auditability while accommodating faster settlement. Ben-Hur and Burns emphasized that compliance programs, supervision, documentation, audit trails, surveillance, and cybersecurity measures become more critical as settlement systems accelerate.

The report framed 2026 as a testing period for whether tokenized assets can improve settlement and collateral workflows while maintaining transparency. The outcome of pilot programs will determine whether tokenization becomes integrated into market infrastructure or remains limited in scope, according to Deloitte.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15