Key Takeaways: Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verificationKey Takeaways: Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verification

Vitalik Retracts 2017 “Mountain Man” Take, Citing ZK-SNARKs as Ethereum’s Safety Net

4 min read

Key Takeaways:

  • Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification
  • Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verification without replaying all history
  • Buterin identifies self-verification as a backup to make Ethereum resistant to failures and censorship

One of the positions discussed by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in 2017 and since amended marks an indication of how much Blockchain technology and his own thought in terms of relevance has changed. In a recent post on X, Buterin explained why he no longer agrees with his earlier criticism of full user self-verification, often mocked as a “Mountain Man” approach.

Read More: Vitalik Sides With Critics as Zcash Faces Deepening Rift Over Token-Voting Governance Push

Revisiting a 2017 Blockchain Debate

A comment posted by Butterin came as a result of an argument with researcher in blockchain Ian Grigg. Grigg at the time proposed blockchains to capture the order of transactions, but not to make any commitment to the state, including account balances or storing smart contracts. The concept was that, state would be recreated on-demand, instead of being stored on-chain.

Buterin strongly opposed this design. He argued that without committing state to the blockchain, users would face two bad choices: run a full node that processes every transaction from genesis or trust a third-party RPC provider. Ethereum’s approach, which commits state roots to block headers, allowed users to verify specific values using Merkle proofs under an honest majority assumption.

In 2017, Buterin considered the full self-verification to be out of practice with most users due to the high computational cost. His stance was oriented to the technological constraints of that time and tradeoffs developers had to make to ensure that blockchains were practical.

Read More: Vitalik Buterin Sells Two Meme Coins, Scores $114.7K in 13,889 USDC & 28.58 ETH

ZK-SNARKs Change the Cost Equation

The most significant one, as Buterin claims, is the maturation of zero-knowledge proof systems, particularly, ZK-SNARKs. Users can use such tools to check whether the blockchain state is accurate without having to re-run all the transactions in the history.

Buterin described this breakthrough as delivering “the benefits without the costs.” Users no longer have to decide between trust and massive computation, but can use cryptographic proofs to ensure that they are correct at an efficient rate. This, in his words, fundamentally reverses the tradeoffs that are acceptable.

Verification Without Replaying the Chain

ZK-SNARKs enable it to verify that the chain is valid without sacrificing the computational cost which once made self-verification impractical. In the case of Ethereum it opens the path to more robust guarantees related to decentralization with no usability or scaling trade-off.

Buterin holds that the ecosystem needs to have higher expectations and re-evaluate tradeoffs that were present in previous stages of blockchain development with better tools at hand.

Real-World Failures Shape Ethereum’s Philosophy

In addition to cryptography, Buterin stressed on what he learned when things did go wrong in the real world. Peer-to-peer networks may crash, latency may soar and long-established third-party service may just vanish. During such times, it is a weakness that the users rely on the developers or centralized infrastructure.

Other risks identified by him include validator concentration, plausible 51% attacks, and intermediary censorship and refers to incidents such as Tornado Cash restrictions as a reminder that direct chain access may become a necessity.

For Buterin, self-verification is not a daily requirement but a safety mechanism. The “Mountain Man’s cabin” is a retreat users can rely on when systems fail, and its existence alone improves the balance of power. He likened it to BitTorrent’s role in keeping streaming platforms honest.

The post Vitalik Retracts 2017 “Mountain Man” Take, Citing ZK-SNARKs as Ethereum’s Safety Net appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
Verimatrix: Sale of Extended Threat Defense Assets (Mobile Application Protection) to Guardsquare

Verimatrix: Sale of Extended Threat Defense Assets (Mobile Application Protection) to Guardsquare

Completion of the sale of XTD assets (code and mobile application protection), including a portfolio of patents and a team of experts. The Group is refocusing on
Share
AI Journal2026/02/06 00:49
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52