TLDR: DeFi Earn offers 4%–8% APY, delivering up to 16x higher returns than traditional savings accounts  Banks face structural asset-liability mismatches that limitTLDR: DeFi Earn offers 4%–8% APY, delivering up to 16x higher returns than traditional savings accounts  Banks face structural asset-liability mismatches that limit

DeFi Yields Explained: Why Products Matter More Than Direct Protocols

3 min read

TLDR:

  • DeFi Earn offers 4%–8% APY, delivering up to 16x higher returns than traditional savings accounts 
  • Banks face structural asset-liability mismatches that limit yield and create hidden systemic risk 
  • On-chain transparency exposes DeFi risks early, unlike opaque bank balance sheets
  • Products manage protocol selection, monitoring, custody, and risk—critical for mass adoption

Decentralized finance has unlocked yields far beyond traditional banking, yet adoption remains limited. While DeFi protocols generate transparent, on-chain returns, most users are unwilling to manage the complexity and risk alone. 

As platforms like Kraken’s DeFi Earn demonstrate, the future of DeFi adoption lies not in raw protocol access, but in products that abstract risk, manage exposure, and make yield accessible to everyday users.

Why DeFi Yields Outperform Traditional Banks

Traditional banks offer extremely low savings returns. Most accounts pay between 0.3% and 0.6% APY. On a $100,000 balance, that equals roughly $500 per year. 

DeFi strategies today deliver 4% to 8% APY, translating to $5,000–$8,000 annually. The difference is real, measurable, and available now.

Banks are structurally limited. They fund themselves with short-term deposits but invest in long-duration loans and bonds. 

This mismatch between assets and liabilities exposes them to hidden risks. When interest rates rise or liquidity tightens, banks cannot react quickly. 

Losses accumulate silently. Because balance sheets are opaque, problems are often invisible until confidence collapses, causing sudden systemic failures.

DeFi operates differently. Protocols are transparent by design. Assets, liabilities, collateralization ratios, and liquidity are visible on-chain in real time. 

Risk cannot be hidden, and problems are observable early. This transparency does not remove risk but allows it to be monitored and managed before crises occur.

Why Products, Not Protocols, Drive Adoption

Despite their advantages, DeFi protocols are not designed for everyday users. Using them directly requires constant monitoring, strategy selection, diversification, and responding to smart contract updates or market stress. 

Most users lack the expertise, time, or appetite for these responsibilities. Products like Kraken’s DeFi Earn solve this problem. 

Users are not paying for the yield itself; they pay for risk management, protocol selection, operational monitoring, custody, security, and reporting. These responsibilities exist regardless of decentralization—the question is who assumes them.

For most people, the choice is not between 5% and 8% APY. It is between near-zero bank returns, managing DeFi risk alone, or earning significantly more through a managed product.

 Products simplify adoption, making transparent infrastructure usable. Protocols alone cannot onboard the next hundred million users. 

Products do. Adoption requires engineering, compliance, capital, and long-term accountability. Platforms like Kraken transform DeFi from raw infrastructure into accessible financial products. 

This is how decentralized finance scales, evolves, and reaches mainstream users. DeFi protocols offer transparency and high yields, but adoption depends on products. 

Platforms like Kraken DeFi Earn simplify risk, manage exposure, and turn infrastructure into accessible financial tools, bridging the gap between raw protocols and everyday users.

The post DeFi Yields Explained: Why Products Matter More Than Direct Protocols appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Top Altcoins To Hold Before 2026 For Maximum ROI – One Is Under $1!

Top Altcoins To Hold Before 2026 For Maximum ROI – One Is Under $1!

BlockchainFX presale surges past $7.5M at $0.024 per token with 500x ROI potential, staking rewards, and BLOCK30 bonus still live — top altcoin to hold before 2026.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:16
UBS CEO Targets Direct Crypto Access With “Fast Follower” Tokenization Strategy

UBS CEO Targets Direct Crypto Access With “Fast Follower” Tokenization Strategy

The tension in UBS’s latest strategy update is not between profit and innovation, but between speed and control. On February 4, 2026, as the bank reported a record
Share
Ethnews2026/02/05 04:56
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01