The post TRX Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX’s 24-hour trading volume is running slightly below the recent weekly average at 164The post TRX Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX’s 24-hour trading volume is running slightly below the recent weekly average at 164

TRX Technical Analysis Feb 3

4 min read

TRX’s 24-hour trading volume is running slightly below the recent weekly average at 164.58 million $; along with low participation, the limited price drop indicates weak selling pressure and gives possible accumulation signals.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

TRX’s current volume profile shows that market participation has decreased recently. While the 24-hour volume is at the 164.58 million $ level, this figure is about 15% lower compared to the last 7-day average. This situation reveals that sellers are not aggressive even as the downtrend continues. While the price stabilizes around $0.28, this calmness in volume reflects that the broad masses have not yet entered panic selling. In the volume profile, a prominent high volume node (HVN) has formed around the $0.2818 support level; this indicates that buyers are defending here. On the other hand, low volume nodes (LVN) dominate in the $0.2895-$0.2957 resistance band, meaning additional volume is required for upward breaks. In terms of market participation, while retail traders’ interest is low, 11 strong levels (mostly resistance) in 1D/3D/1W timeframes in MTF (multi-timeframe) analysis show that institutional players are approaching cautiously. For a healthy volume profile, volume would be expected to increase in down moves; however, the volume decline here gives an early warning that the trend is tiring.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation signals are strengthening gradually. While the price is suppressed below EMA20 ($0.29), RSI at 35.73 level is approaching the oversold region; however, there is no significant increase in volume on down candles. This is a classic Wyckoff accumulation phase: volume remains low while sells are absorbed. The high-volume defense at $0.2818 support suggests that big players are accumulating positions here. In the last 3 days, despite a 0.14% price drop, volume declined 20% – positive volume divergence implies buyers are secretly accumulating. Although Supertrend is bearish, the stability at this level is preparing ideal ground for accumulation.

Distribution Risks

Distribution risk is low but should not be ignored. Past volume spikes at $0.2895 resistance show a sell wall forming here. If the price approaches this level and volume explodes, distribution could be triggered. Low-volume declines consistent with MACD’s negative histogram are safe for now, but risk increases if combined with a possible BTC dump. In MTF, 3 resistance levels in the 1W timeframe keep the long-term distribution scenario alive.

Price-Volume Alignment

Volume does not confirm the price movement, emphasizing that the downtrend is weak. The -0.14% change in the last 24 hours occurred with extraordinarily low volume; normally, volume would increase 2-3 times in such a drop. This divergence shows that the price is falling without volume and sets the stage for a possible reversal. Although the bullish target of $0.3175 has a weak score (16/100), it is reachable with volume increase. The bearish target of $0.2395 is realistic if the volume-less decline continues. Overall, volume increase in up moves is essential for a healthy uptrend; the current situation whispers of hidden strength to carry the price upward.

Big Player Activity

Big player activity appears hidden amid low-volume stability. The HVN at $0.2818 indicates accumulation of whale-level buy orders – a typical institutional accumulation pattern. In the last week, there is no volume climax at resistances in higher timeframes; this shows that smart money has not yet distributed. While retail sells are absorbed, supported by on-chain data (no current data), whales can be said to be net buyers. Attention: Exact positions cannot be known, but volume patterns point to cautious optimism. Detailed review is recommended for TRX Spot Analysis and TRX Futures Analysis.

Bitcoin Correlation

While BTC rises +1.85% at $78,065 level, TRX’s slight decline creates negative divergence. BTC Supertrend bearish and rising dominance signal caution for altcoins; TRX is lagging relative to BTC. If BTC supports at $78,778-$74,604 break, TRX could test $0.27. Conversely, if BTC breaks resistances at $79,346-$83,548, expect volume explosion in TRX – correlation around 0.75. TRX’s low-volume resilience against BTC dump shows relative strength.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook is neutral-bullish leaning: Low participation weakens sells, opening a window for accumulation. In the short term, if $0.2818 holds, long positions can be entered with volume confirmation; stop at $0.2706 on breakdown. In the long term, $0.3175 target is realistic with volume increase. Risk: Dump synchronized with BTC bearishness. Volume tells the story beyond price – listen!

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/trx-technical-analysis-february-3-2026-volume-and-accumulation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15