Every time he sees trouble brewing, Donald Trump exhibits a telltale panic response.When he’s cornered, when the walls close in and facts start to make the hairEvery time he sees trouble brewing, Donald Trump exhibits a telltale panic response.When he’s cornered, when the walls close in and facts start to make the hair

This is Trump’s dead giveaway that he was in over his head with Epstein

2026/02/11 18:30
6 min read

Every time he sees trouble brewing, Donald Trump exhibits a telltale panic response.

When he’s cornered, when the walls close in and facts start to make the hair left on his head stand straight up — although a stiff wind will do that too — Trump doesn’t simply deny. He lies by preemptively distancing himself.

It’s the first clue he’s in real trouble, and it’s turned into one of his most revealing traits.

He muddies timelines. He feigns ignorance. He never knew the person or persons in question. He suddenly remembers “falling out,” years earlier. He insists everyone else knew more than he did.

We know the routine: Trump is lying through his teeth.

He tries to get ahead of the story by pretending he was never really in it. Panic kicks in, and he does something so over-the-top it screams “Guilty, guilty, guilty!” He goes on the offensive by reinserting himself as a supposedly credible source.

This is exactly what makes newly surfaced FBI records from a 2019 interview with a retired Palm Beach police chief so damning — not because they accuse Trump of a crime, but because they expose his reflexive damage control in real time.

It’s the kind of response you only deploy when the truth is biting your bulbous ass. A maneuver only Trump has perfected — or imperfected.

According to those records, first reported by the indefatigable Julie K. Brown of the Miami Herald, in July 2006, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s first criminal investigation became public, Trump called Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter.

Trump didn’t call to express shock or support. He didn’t call to ask questions. And he didn’t call because he had just learned something stunning.

No, he called to say, in essence: “Everyone already knew, and I had nothing to do with it. Nothing.

He wanted it known he was nowhere near Epstein, had barely known him, and definitely didn’t need looking into as well.

Here’s what Trump reportedly said, but you can read between the lines: “Thank goodness you’re stopping him. Everyone has known he’s been doing this.”

Trump allegedly described Epstein’s behavior with teenage girls as “disgusting,” warned that Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell was his “operative,” and urged police to focus on her, calling her “evil.”

Then came the magnum opus: Trump claimed he had once been around Epstein when teenagers were present, and had “got the hell out of there.”

OMG, Donald, slow down. Take a breath. Methinks thou dost protest too much.

This wasn’t a man discovering a predator. This was a man carefully placing himself just far enough away from one while making sure law enforcement heard, loud and clear, that he shouldn’t be counted among the naïve.

And yes, I know what you’re thinking. If he knew, if he saw Epstein with teenage girls, why didn’t he say something? Why didn’t he go to the authorities? Why didn’t he blow the whistle?

Because, of course, Trump was likely fibbing. You can bet he didn’t get “the hell out of there.” He stayed. And he played. You can make that assumption because of Trump’s overreaction.

For years afterward, Trump told a very different story.

  • He minimized his relationship with Epstein, saying, “Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.”
  • He claimed he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago two decades ago because the sex offender was stealing young spa workers.
  • He insisted they hadn’t spoken in 15 years. Twenty, 15, who’s counting?
  • His lawyers said he had “no knowledge whatsoever” of Epstein’s conduct.
  • When Maxwell was arrested, Trump didn’t condemn her. He famously said he “wished her well.”

Those statements are irreconcilable with the 2006 call in which Trump claimed everyone knew Epstein abused minors.

Everyone knew, but Trump didn’t? All of Palm Beach knew, but Trump, a fixture of Palm Beach society, didn’t? Sure. I guess when the gossip started at Mar-a-Lago, Trump ran to the DJ and blasted “YMCA” so he couldn’t hear the sordid scuttlebutt.

While Trump’s linguistic gymnastics are laughable, what he’s lying about is not. Nearly every man tied to Epstein lied about his relationship with him, until the drip, drip, drip of documents exposed the deceit. The same holds true for Trump.

The FBI records don’t accuse Trump of criminal wrongdoing. But they do something arguably more damaging. They show he understood exactly how bad Epstein was when it mattered, and then spent two decades pretending otherwise.

It’s Trump’s pattern.

He didn’t know about the hush money paid to Stormy Daniels, didn’t know her either, until investigators produced the canceled checks. He had “nothing to do” with Project 2025, until he staffed his administration with its authors.

He denied knowing Paul Manafort, his campaign manager, shared data with a Russian associate.

He claimed he took no classified documents from the White House, until his own voice contradicted him.

Now this gem. The irony is that Trump followed his playbook with (now former) Prince Andrew, flatly denying he knew him, only to have photos and his own past praise prove the relationship he rushed to disown was real.

There are too many examples to list, because Trump’s diversions happen daily.

Every time, the same routine: distance first, details later. Denials until evidence forces revision. By then the truth is a muddle.

The 2006 call isn’t vindicating. Trump wasn’t confessing. He was positioning. He was laying down a narrative designed to frame himself as an outsider to Epstein’s crimes rather than someone entangled in Epstein’s orbit and behavior.

It’s as if Trump believed that by calling police and loudly declaring “everyone knows,” he could immunize himself from scrutiny.

The FBI files show Trump knew. Trump lied about knowing. And Trump did what he always does. He tried to talk his way out before anyone asked the right questions.

That’s the dead giveaway.

Trump was in deep. Way deep. In over his head. Now the question is, why isn’t Trump’s head rolling like so many others?

  • John Casey was most recently Senior Editor, The Advocate, and is a freelance opinion and feature story writer. Previously, he was a Capitol Hill press secretary, and spent 25 years in media and public relations in NYC. He is the co-author of LOVE: The Heroic Stories of Marriage Equality (Rizzoli, 2025), named by Oprah in her "Best 25 of 2025.”
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.127
$3.127$3.127
-5.44%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

The post American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: American Bitcoin (ABTC) surged nearly 85% on its Nasdaq debut, briefly reaching a $5B valuation. The Trump family, alongside Hut 8 Mining, controls 98% of the newly merged crypto-mining entity. Eric Trump called Bitcoin “modern-day gold,” predicting it could reach $1 million per coin. American Bitcoin, a fast-rising crypto mining firm with strong political and institutional backing, has officially entered Wall Street. After merging with Gryphon Digital Mining, the company made its Nasdaq debut under the ticker ABTC, instantly drawing global attention to both its stock performance and its bold vision for Bitcoin’s future. Read More: Trump-Backed Crypto Firm Eyes Asia for Bold Bitcoin Expansion Nasdaq Debut: An Explosive First Day ABTC’s first day of trading proved as dramatic as expected. Shares surged almost 85% at the open, touching a peak of $14 before settling at lower levels by the close. That initial spike valued the company around $5 billion, positioning it as one of 2025’s most-watched listings. At the last session, ABTC has been trading at $7.28 per share, which is a small positive 2.97% per day. Although the price has decelerated since opening highs, analysts note that the company has been off to a strong start and early investor activity is a hard-to-find feat in a newly-launched crypto mining business. According to market watchers, the listing comes at a time of new momentum in the digital asset markets. With Bitcoin trading above $110,000 this quarter, American Bitcoin’s entry comes at a time when both institutional investors and retail traders are showing heightened interest in exposure to Bitcoin-linked equities. Ownership Structure: Trump Family and Hut 8 at the Helm Its management and ownership set up has increased the visibility of the company. The Trump family and the Canadian mining giant Hut 8 Mining jointly own 98 percent…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:33
‘Compromise is in the air’: Ripple CLO signals progress on crypto bill

‘Compromise is in the air’: Ripple CLO signals progress on crypto bill

The post ‘Compromise is in the air’: Ripple CLO signals progress on crypto bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The White House made a second attempt to broker
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 19:31
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39