The post Bubblemaps Flags $12M Snipe in $YZY Launch Linked to Hayden Davis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bubblemaps reports that Hayden Davis, the figure behind the LIBRA token project, allegedly sniped the $YZY token at launch. Using multiple addresses. Generating roughly $12 million in profits. It all starts with the timing. Hayden Davis had $57 million in funds unfrozen. The very next day, $YZY went live. On-chain sleuths noticed something strange. Several addresses funded from centralized exchanges (CEXs) just before the YZY launch. Following the trail, they found a cluster ready to snipe the token. Bubblemaps linked these addresses back to Hayden Davis, also known as Kelsier. Funding transactions, CCTP transfers, and shared deposits connected the dots. The snipers bought in early. As early as 1:54 AM UTC. That’s one minute after the YZY launch announcement. In total, 14 wallets took part. Together, they made $12 million in profits. Insider or Just Lucky? Bubblemaps stops short of saying Hayden Davis had insider info. There’s no direct link to the YZY team confirmed yet. But the timing raises eyebrows. Addresses funded the day before. Profits rolling in within minutes. The same figure linked to previous snipes. This isn’t Hayden’s first rodeo. Bubblemaps points to past launches. MELANIA. LIBRA. Other coins covered before. The same patterns appear. Quick funding. Early buys. Big gains. The $YZY Launch Timeline $57M in Hayden Davis’ funds unfrozen The next day, $YZY launches Addresses funded from CEXs the day before Cluster of wallets linked to Hayden Davis buys early $12M profit booked by 14 addresses All within 24 hours. How Bubblemaps Tracks It Bubblemaps uses on-chain clustering. It follows transactions across wallets and chains. In this case, CCTP transfers played a role in linking addresses. Shared deposits to the same exchanges provided another clue. The result: a clear picture of how funds moved before and after launch. And the profits speak for themselves. What… The post Bubblemaps Flags $12M Snipe in $YZY Launch Linked to Hayden Davis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bubblemaps reports that Hayden Davis, the figure behind the LIBRA token project, allegedly sniped the $YZY token at launch. Using multiple addresses. Generating roughly $12 million in profits. It all starts with the timing. Hayden Davis had $57 million in funds unfrozen. The very next day, $YZY went live. On-chain sleuths noticed something strange. Several addresses funded from centralized exchanges (CEXs) just before the YZY launch. Following the trail, they found a cluster ready to snipe the token. Bubblemaps linked these addresses back to Hayden Davis, also known as Kelsier. Funding transactions, CCTP transfers, and shared deposits connected the dots. The snipers bought in early. As early as 1:54 AM UTC. That’s one minute after the YZY launch announcement. In total, 14 wallets took part. Together, they made $12 million in profits. Insider or Just Lucky? Bubblemaps stops short of saying Hayden Davis had insider info. There’s no direct link to the YZY team confirmed yet. But the timing raises eyebrows. Addresses funded the day before. Profits rolling in within minutes. The same figure linked to previous snipes. This isn’t Hayden’s first rodeo. Bubblemaps points to past launches. MELANIA. LIBRA. Other coins covered before. The same patterns appear. Quick funding. Early buys. Big gains. The $YZY Launch Timeline $57M in Hayden Davis’ funds unfrozen The next day, $YZY launches Addresses funded from CEXs the day before Cluster of wallets linked to Hayden Davis buys early $12M profit booked by 14 addresses All within 24 hours. How Bubblemaps Tracks It Bubblemaps uses on-chain clustering. It follows transactions across wallets and chains. In this case, CCTP transfers played a role in linking addresses. Shared deposits to the same exchanges provided another clue. The result: a clear picture of how funds moved before and after launch. And the profits speak for themselves. What…

Bubblemaps Flags $12M Snipe in $YZY Launch Linked to Hayden Davis

2025/08/26 04:05

Bubblemaps reports that Hayden Davis, the figure behind the LIBRA token project, allegedly sniped the $YZY token at launch. Using multiple addresses. Generating roughly $12 million in profits.

It all starts with the timing.

Hayden Davis had $57 million in funds unfrozen. The very next day, $YZY went live.

On-chain sleuths noticed something strange. Several addresses funded from centralized exchanges (CEXs) just before the YZY launch. Following the trail, they found a cluster ready to snipe the token.

Bubblemaps linked these addresses back to Hayden Davis, also known as Kelsier. Funding transactions, CCTP transfers, and shared deposits connected the dots.

The snipers bought in early. As early as 1:54 AM UTC. That’s one minute after the YZY launch announcement.

In total, 14 wallets took part. Together, they made $12 million in profits.

Insider or Just Lucky?

Bubblemaps stops short of saying Hayden Davis had insider info. There’s no direct link to the YZY team confirmed yet. But the timing raises eyebrows.

Addresses funded the day before. Profits rolling in within minutes. The same figure linked to previous snipes.

This isn’t Hayden’s first rodeo.

Bubblemaps points to past launches. MELANIA. LIBRA. Other coins covered before. The same patterns appear. Quick funding. Early buys. Big gains.

The $YZY Launch Timeline

  • $57M in Hayden Davis’ funds unfrozen
  • The next day, $YZY launches
  • Addresses funded from CEXs the day before
  • Cluster of wallets linked to Hayden Davis buys early
  • $12M profit booked by 14 addresses

All within 24 hours.

How Bubblemaps Tracks It

Bubblemaps uses on-chain clustering. It follows transactions across wallets and chains. In this case, CCTP transfers played a role in linking addresses. Shared deposits to the same exchanges provided another clue.

The result: a clear picture of how funds moved before and after launch. And the profits speak for themselves.

What This Means for Traders

For retail traders, the YZY case is another warning.

High-profile launches often attract whales with deep pockets. When wallets fund ahead of time and buy in seconds after launch, average traders rarely stand a chance.

Bubblemaps’ work shows why on-chain transparency matters. It exposes patterns the public might otherwise miss.

Past Patterns: MELANIA, LIBRA, and More

Hayden Davis, or Kelsier, shows up in other Bubblemaps reports.

  • MELANIA: Early buys. Big exits.
  • LIBRA: Same story. Fast profits.

Other tokens: Bubblemaps hints at multiple cases with similar playbooks.

The YZY launch looks like part of a bigger pattern.

Community Reaction On The Ongoing Drama

The crypto community split on the findings.

Some argue Hayden Davis simply moves fast and takes risks. Others point to the timing and profits as signs of possible insider edges.

With $12M in profits from YZY alone, the debate isn’t going away.

Bubblemaps’ Report

Full details and wallet clusters appear in Bubblemaps’ official post here:

The report shows the timing, funding paths, and profit breakdown in visual form.

Bubblemaps stops short of calling it insider trading. But the patterns raise questions.

And this isn’t the first time Hayden Davis’ name appears in token sniping stories. With more eyes on on-chain activity than ever, future launches might not stay quiet for long.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/bubblemaps-flags-12m-snipe-in-yzy-launch-linked-to-hayden-davis/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.00944
$0.00944$0.00944
-2.78%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Share
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00