Key Takeaways: Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time. By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun. Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun. The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high. New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum. In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless. If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.Source: Dune Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long. However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million. Did Paybacks Make the Difference? There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators. One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.Source: Pump.Fun’s X account Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem. The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.Source: CoinGecko More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions. At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.Source: Blackwork Research Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model. Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.Source: Dune Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead. At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN). Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs. A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly. In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens Key Takeaways: Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time. By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun. Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun. The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high. New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum. In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless. If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.Source: Dune Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long. However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million. Did Paybacks Make the Difference? There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators. One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.Source: Pump.Fun’s X account Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem. The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.Source: CoinGecko More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions. At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.Source: Blackwork Research Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model. Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.Source: Dune Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead. At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN). Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs. A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly. In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens

Meme Coin Wars: Can Pump.Fun Hold On?

5 min read

Key Takeaways:

  • Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time.
  • By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun.
  • Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun.
  • The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high.
  • New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum.

In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless.

If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.

Source: Dune

Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long.

However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million.

Did Paybacks Make the Difference?

There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators.

One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.

Source: Pump.Fun’s X account

Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem.

The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.

Source: CoinGecko

More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene

LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions.

At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.

Source: Blackwork Research

Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model.

Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.

Source: Dune

Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space

The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead.

At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN).

Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs.

A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly.

In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens.

Market Opportunity
Sport.Fun Logo
Sport.Fun Price(FUN)
$0.03172
$0.03172$0.03172
-5.87%
USD
Sport.Fun (FUN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Top NYC Book Publishing Companies

Top NYC Book Publishing Companies

New York City has been the epicenter of American publishing for generations, but “NYC publishing” isn’t just one lane. Today’s landscape includes two very different
Share
Techbullion2026/02/06 14:02
Sensorion Announces its Participation in the Association for Research in Otolaryngology ARO 49th Annual Midwinter Meeting

Sensorion Announces its Participation in the Association for Research in Otolaryngology ARO 49th Annual Midwinter Meeting

MONTPELLIER, France–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Regulatory News: Sensorion (FR0012596468 – ALSEN) a pioneering clinical-stage biotechnology company which specializes in the
Share
AI Journal2026/02/06 14:45
AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media

AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media

AI crypto trading is everywhere, and every YouTube guru claims their bot mints money while they sleep. Sounds dreamy, right? However, most don’t discuss the full story, the wild profits possible, and the lurking pitfalls. As someone obsessed with the intersection of artificial intelligence and digital assets, let me pull back the curtain on the realities of algorithmic trading in the crypto jungle. Here’s what nobody tells you: 87% of retail traders using automated systems lose money within their first year. The marketing materials show cherry-picked results. The testimonials come from paid affiliates. But here’s the twist. The remaining 13% who succeed aren’t just lucky. They understand something the majority misses entirely. The Reality Behind the Hype The crypto world loves success stories. You’ve probably seen them. “I made $50,000 in three months using this bot.” What they don’t mention? The $200,000 they lost by testing seventeen other systems first. Real talk: most trading algorithms fail because they’re built for perfect market conditions. Crypto markets are anything but perfect. Think about it like this. Would you trust a Formula 1 car to handle rush hour traffic? That’s essentially what most people do with their trading bots. Why Smart Money Uses Crypto AI Tools Differently Professional traders approach crypto AI tools with surgical precision. They don’t expect miracles. They expect consistent, measured results. The difference lies in understanding what these tools actually do well: • Risk management automation • Pattern recognition at scale • Emotional bias elimination • 24/7 market monitoring • Portfolio rebalancing Notice what’s missing from that list? Get-rich-quick schemes. The smartest crypto AI tools focus on protecting capital first. Profits come second. This mindset separates winners from losers. Here’s something interesting. 9-figure media companies track these patterns religiously. They know which crypto AI tools produce sustainable results versus flashy short-term gains. Professional traders using crypto AI tools typically target 15–25% annual returns. Not 500% monthly moonshots. The Startup Connection Most People Ignore AI for startups isn’t just about building the next ChatGPT. Many successful companies use AI to optimize their crypto treasury management. Smart startups integrate crypto AI tools into their financial operations early. They automate routine decisions. They reduce human error. They scale their trading operations without hiring armies of analysts. But here’s where it gets interesting. The best AI for startup applications in crypto aren’t the obvious ones. Consider automated tax reporting. Or real-time compliance monitoring. Or treasury optimization across multiple blockchains. These unsexy applications generate more consistent profits than flashy trading algorithms. AI for startups in the crypto space succeeds when it solves boring problems efficiently. Not when it promises unrealistic returns. The most successful AI for startups implementations focus on operational efficiency. They reduce costs. They minimize risks. They free up human resources for strategic decisions. Learning from Top AI Start-Ups Top AI start-ups in the crypto space share common characteristics. They prioritize transparency over marketing hype. Look at successful top AI start-ups like Chainalysis or Elliptic. They don’t promise easy money. They provide essential infrastructure. The best top AI start-ups focus on solving real problems: • Market data analysis • Security monitoring • Regulatory compliance • Portfolio analytics • Risk assessment These top AI start-ups understand something crucial. Sustainable businesses solve actual problems. They don’t just ride hype cycles. 9-figure media outlets consistently highlight these fundamental companies. They ignore the noise. They focus on substance. Many top AI start-ups actually discourage retail trading. They know the odds. They’ve seen the casualties. Instead, successful top AI start-ups build tools for institutions. Banks. Hedge funds. Companies with proper risk management systems. The Hidden Costs Nobody Discusses Using crypto AI tools costs more than subscription fees. Much more. First, there’s the learning curve. Most people spend months figuring out proper settings. During this time, they’re paying tuition to the market. Second, there’s infrastructure. Reliable crypto AI tools require stable internet, backup systems, and proper security measures. Third, there’s opportunity cost. Time spent tweaking algorithms could be spent learning fundamental analysis. The real cost? Most people using crypto AI tools trade more frequently. Increased trading usually means increased losses. Think about 9-figure media companies again. They understand that technology amplifies existing skills. It doesn’t replace them. Smart Implementation Strategies Successful crypto AI tools users follow specific patterns: • Start with paper trading • Use position sizing rules • Set strict stop losses • Monitor performance weekly • Adjust strategies quarterly They treat crypto AI tools like any other business tool. With respect. With caution. With realistic expectations, startup applications work similarly. They augment human decision-making. They don’t replace it. The most successful AI for startups implementations in crypto involve human oversight at every level. Algorithms suggest. Humans decide. What Actually Works Here’s what separates successful crypto AI tools users from everyone else: They focus on consistency over home runs. They understand that small, regular gains compound better than occasional big wins followed by devastating losses. They apply AI principles to their approach for startups. They iterate quickly. They fail fast. They learn constantly. They study top AI start-ups for inspiration. But they don’t try to replicate their exact strategies. Most importantly, they never risk money they can’t afford to lose. The crypto market will humble anyone. AI doesn’t change this fundamental truth. Your success with crypto AI tools depends more on your discipline than the sophistication of your algorithms. Remember: the house always has an edge. Your job is to find where that edge doesn’t apply. That’s the secret they won’t tell you. AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 23:20