The post Controversial Hyperliquid HIP-5 Proposal Leaves Community Split appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. If passed, HIP-5 would establish a second Hyperliquid assistance fund to bootstrap and support ecosystem tokens beyond HYPE. The Hyperliquid community is considering a new proposal, dubbed HIP-5, that would establish a secondary assistance fund to support Hyperliquid ecosystem projects using a portion of the decentralized exchange’s revenue. One of the proposal’s co-authors, Ericonomic, shared the details on X and in the Hyperliquid Discord, but the idea of altering Hyperliquid’s fee buyback mechanism has left the community split. Currently, Hyperliquid uses 99% of its revenue to buy back HYPE tokens through its assistance fund. Under HIP-5, a second assistance fund (AF2) would be formed with up to 5% of total protocol fees allocated to buy back tokens from Hyperliquid’s strict list, such as PURR, and upcoming ecosystem tokens from Kinetiq, Felix, and other HyperEVM protocols. Hypothetical Fee Distribution – HIP-5 HYPE stakers would be able to vote to determine which ecosystem tokens to buy and in what quantities. One user, known as Altoshi, responded on X and said, “respectfully, I don’t support this. Allocating fees to third-party projects may lead to bribery, and cabals milking money from the DAO; given the USDH voting process, this would lead to some groups using AF2 as the exit liquidity for their seed investments. This is exactly what happened to Cosmos $ATOM and Polkadot $DOT, cabals were milking the system.”\ Meanwhile, other HYPE holders voiced their support for the mechanism, claiming that it incentivizes builders and HYPE governance participation. Purrteil, an anonymous trader and Hyperliquid supporter, said, “This is literally what I spoke about since TGE. Would love to see it happen!” “It will encourage literally every single builder in the space to build on top of HL, because their token would participate in this. Meanwhile, it brings another utility for $HYPE,” Purrteil concluded.… The post Controversial Hyperliquid HIP-5 Proposal Leaves Community Split appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. If passed, HIP-5 would establish a second Hyperliquid assistance fund to bootstrap and support ecosystem tokens beyond HYPE. The Hyperliquid community is considering a new proposal, dubbed HIP-5, that would establish a secondary assistance fund to support Hyperliquid ecosystem projects using a portion of the decentralized exchange’s revenue. One of the proposal’s co-authors, Ericonomic, shared the details on X and in the Hyperliquid Discord, but the idea of altering Hyperliquid’s fee buyback mechanism has left the community split. Currently, Hyperliquid uses 99% of its revenue to buy back HYPE tokens through its assistance fund. Under HIP-5, a second assistance fund (AF2) would be formed with up to 5% of total protocol fees allocated to buy back tokens from Hyperliquid’s strict list, such as PURR, and upcoming ecosystem tokens from Kinetiq, Felix, and other HyperEVM protocols. Hypothetical Fee Distribution – HIP-5 HYPE stakers would be able to vote to determine which ecosystem tokens to buy and in what quantities. One user, known as Altoshi, responded on X and said, “respectfully, I don’t support this. Allocating fees to third-party projects may lead to bribery, and cabals milking money from the DAO; given the USDH voting process, this would lead to some groups using AF2 as the exit liquidity for their seed investments. This is exactly what happened to Cosmos $ATOM and Polkadot $DOT, cabals were milking the system.”\ Meanwhile, other HYPE holders voiced their support for the mechanism, claiming that it incentivizes builders and HYPE governance participation. Purrteil, an anonymous trader and Hyperliquid supporter, said, “This is literally what I spoke about since TGE. Would love to see it happen!” “It will encourage literally every single builder in the space to build on top of HL, because their token would participate in this. Meanwhile, it brings another utility for $HYPE,” Purrteil concluded.…

Controversial Hyperliquid HIP-5 Proposal Leaves Community Split

2025/11/06 08:05

If passed, HIP-5 would establish a second Hyperliquid assistance fund to bootstrap and support ecosystem tokens beyond HYPE.

The Hyperliquid community is considering a new proposal, dubbed HIP-5, that would establish a secondary assistance fund to support Hyperliquid ecosystem projects using a portion of the decentralized exchange’s revenue.

One of the proposal’s co-authors, Ericonomic, shared the details on X and in the Hyperliquid Discord, but the idea of altering Hyperliquid’s fee buyback mechanism has left the community split.

Currently, Hyperliquid uses 99% of its revenue to buy back HYPE tokens through its assistance fund. Under HIP-5, a second assistance fund (AF2) would be formed with up to 5% of total protocol fees allocated to buy back tokens from Hyperliquid’s strict list, such as PURR, and upcoming ecosystem tokens from Kinetiq, Felix, and other HyperEVM protocols.

Hypothetical Fee Distribution – HIP-5

HYPE stakers would be able to vote to determine which ecosystem tokens to buy and in what quantities.

One user, known as Altoshi, responded on X and said, “respectfully, I don’t support this. Allocating fees to third-party projects may lead to bribery, and cabals milking money from the DAO; given the USDH voting process, this would lead to some groups using AF2 as the exit liquidity for their seed investments. This is exactly what happened to Cosmos $ATOM and Polkadot $DOT, cabals were milking the system.”\

Meanwhile, other HYPE holders voiced their support for the mechanism, claiming that it incentivizes builders and HYPE governance participation. Purrteil, an anonymous trader and Hyperliquid supporter, said, “This is literally what I spoke about since TGE. Would love to see it happen!”

“It will encourage literally every single builder in the space to build on top of HL, because their token would participate in this. Meanwhile, it brings another utility for $HYPE,” Purrteil concluded.

Source: https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/controversial-hyperliquid-hip-5-proposal-leaves-community-split

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16