The post EuroVision Facing Possible Boycotts Over Gaza Disputes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. (Photo by Harold Cunningham/Getty Images) Getty Images As Paris hunkers down for another day of “manifestations” (national protest marches and strikes) over Israel’s continuing war on a battered Gaza, following similar massive protests in Spain, one of Europe’s biggest televised annual events faces boycotts, delays or worse as it tries to survive the controversy. Eurovision is a reality TV competition featuring single bands representing each participating country, with fans across Europe voting on their favorites. Last year, 37 countries participated in the 69th contest since the first one in 1956, with Austria’s JJ performing Wasted Love for a mammoth audience of 166 million viewers. But both the number of participants and audience members might be considerably smaller in the 2026 edition, despite those huge ratings, acknowledged the man charged with overseeing the competition. The problem: whether Israeli public broadcaster KAN will be able to keep participating despite calls for boycotts from some countries. “We’re a member-owned organization,” said Noel Curran, director general of the European Broadcasting Union, or EBU. He was talking over the weekend from the stage of IBC, the big annual broadcasting conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. “This is a member decision. This is not a decision taken in an office in Geneva. We understand how complicated this is.” Some countries have said they won’t participate in 2026 if KAN is involved, Curran said. Others have said they won’t participate if KAN is blocked. Though the statements on each side put Curran in an uncomfortable position, he said he welcomed the clarity. The EBU’s board will consider the statements and other issues when it meets in November, then make a recommendation that the entire membership will vote on. “It’s tricky,” Curran said. “The views are diametrically opposed.” The EBU represents 112 state-owned, public-service broadcasters from 56 countries, and… The post EuroVision Facing Possible Boycotts Over Gaza Disputes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. (Photo by Harold Cunningham/Getty Images) Getty Images As Paris hunkers down for another day of “manifestations” (national protest marches and strikes) over Israel’s continuing war on a battered Gaza, following similar massive protests in Spain, one of Europe’s biggest televised annual events faces boycotts, delays or worse as it tries to survive the controversy. Eurovision is a reality TV competition featuring single bands representing each participating country, with fans across Europe voting on their favorites. Last year, 37 countries participated in the 69th contest since the first one in 1956, with Austria’s JJ performing Wasted Love for a mammoth audience of 166 million viewers. But both the number of participants and audience members might be considerably smaller in the 2026 edition, despite those huge ratings, acknowledged the man charged with overseeing the competition. The problem: whether Israeli public broadcaster KAN will be able to keep participating despite calls for boycotts from some countries. “We’re a member-owned organization,” said Noel Curran, director general of the European Broadcasting Union, or EBU. He was talking over the weekend from the stage of IBC, the big annual broadcasting conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. “This is a member decision. This is not a decision taken in an office in Geneva. We understand how complicated this is.” Some countries have said they won’t participate in 2026 if KAN is involved, Curran said. Others have said they won’t participate if KAN is blocked. Though the statements on each side put Curran in an uncomfortable position, he said he welcomed the clarity. The EBU’s board will consider the statements and other issues when it meets in November, then make a recommendation that the entire membership will vote on. “It’s tricky,” Curran said. “The views are diametrically opposed.” The EBU represents 112 state-owned, public-service broadcasters from 56 countries, and…

EuroVision Facing Possible Boycotts Over Gaza Disputes

2025/09/18 05:47

(Photo by Harold Cunningham/Getty Images)

Getty Images

As Paris hunkers down for another day of “manifestations” (national protest marches and strikes) over Israel’s continuing war on a battered Gaza, following similar massive protests in Spain, one of Europe’s biggest televised annual events faces boycotts, delays or worse as it tries to survive the controversy.

Eurovision is a reality TV competition featuring single bands representing each participating country, with fans across Europe voting on their favorites. Last year, 37 countries participated in the 69th contest since the first one in 1956, with Austria’s JJ performing Wasted Love for a mammoth audience of 166 million viewers.

But both the number of participants and audience members might be considerably smaller in the 2026 edition, despite those huge ratings, acknowledged the man charged with overseeing the competition. The problem: whether Israeli public broadcaster KAN will be able to keep participating despite calls for boycotts from some countries.

“We’re a member-owned organization,” said Noel Curran, director general of the European Broadcasting Union, or EBU. He was talking over the weekend from the stage of IBC, the big annual broadcasting conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. “This is a member decision. This is not a decision taken in an office in Geneva. We understand how complicated this is.”

Some countries have said they won’t participate in 2026 if KAN is involved, Curran said. Others have said they won’t participate if KAN is blocked. Though the statements on each side put Curran in an uncomfortable position, he said he welcomed the clarity. The EBU’s board will consider the statements and other issues when it meets in November, then make a recommendation that the entire membership will vote on.

“It’s tricky,” Curran said. “The views are diametrically opposed.”

The EBU represents 112 state-owned, public-service broadcasters from 56 countries, and another 30 associate members from other countries. Those public-service organizations are the Euro equivalents of the U.S. Public Broadcasting System. Like PBS, whose government funding was slashed by the Trump Administration, the Euro equivalents are facing increased political pressure from many directions.

Some of the political pressure hitting EBU members is over difficult political questions such as continued support for Israel among the tens of thousands of killings by Israeli forces after a brutal surprise attack by Hamas nearly two years ago that left 1,200 Israeli civilians dead and hundreds more taken hostage.

Yet the blowback over Israel comes despite the contiinent’s haunting specter of Nazi occupation and the murder of an estimated 6 million Jews during World War II. Reminders of the atrocities committed on Jews in that era continue to surface regularly.

For instance, by happenstance, on the opening day of IBC filmmaker Steve McQueen (12 Years a Slave) began continuously projecting Occupied City, his 32-hour documentary about the Nazi occupation of Amsterdam on the outside walls of the Rijksmuseum, the Netherlands’ most distinguished museum.

Roughly three-quarters of Holland’s Jews, an estimated 102,000 people, were sent to death camps during the occupation, including most famously a teen-aged girl named Anne Frank whose diaries were found and published long after her murder. The house in Amsterdam’s traditionally Jewish Jordaan neighborhood remains one of the most heavily visited attractions in the city, tickets to it requiring long lead times.

McQueen’s documentary details what happened in those years, and is based on the exacting book by his Dutch wife, Bianca Stigter, Occupied City: Amsterdam 1940-1945.

Similar questions of historical oppression of Jews haunt Spain, going back to the 1492 decision by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to force Jews to convert or leave the country (many fled to the relatively tolerant Netherlands and helped fuel its commercial rise). Former Jews deemed insufficiently converted faced the Spanish Inquisition’s tortures.

France, where L’Affaire Dreyfus divided the country for years beginning in 1894, has its own problematic history. But Paris also is spotted with plaques marking where Nazi forces murdered Resistance fighters and Jews during that city’s occupation. The country has been a strong supporter of Israel for years.

That support is under pressure amid Israeli forces’ continued hammering of Gaza, causing starvation and dislocation for its surviving residents. Concerns over the continued attacks have changed the political calculus in France and many other European countries, fueling major regular protests like those coming to Paris on Thursday.

The political shift has been rapid, Curran noted. Just a few years ago, Israel hosted the Eurovision contest, with not a peep of protest. Asked by an IBC audience member whether pausing the contest amid this year’s controversy made sense (it’s only been paused once, during the 2020 COVID lockdown), Curran disagreed.

“We can pause it one year, two years, three years, this geopolitical situation isn’t going away,” Curran said. “We’ve got to make Eurovision as good as possible, then manage this very difficult geopolitical situation as well as we can.”

Part of the problem for the EBU and its members is the financial impact of losing Eurovision from their calendars. As Curran noted, Eurovision ratings have been “absolutely huge,” a goldmine for stodgy state-owned enterprises. That can’t be said about much else in a streaming-first era where all broadcasters, but especially publicly owned ones, have faced funding cuts and drooping viewership.

The political pressure isn’t just over Israel and Eurovision, however, Curran warned.

“Sovereignty,” i.e., wanting European organizations to help/use European businesses in various ways, has suddenly become a much hotter topic for many EBU members since the Trump Administration began pushing tariffs, immigration crackdowns, state ownership of tech companies, and other nativist, authoritarian policies.

“More and more questions are being asked about European sovereignty,” Curran said. “The level of political interference is increasing, I see it year over year. More and more we’re having to get involved in protecting our members.”

It’s going to be a problem for U.S. tech companies working in Europe too, he warned. Curran said 60% of EBU members exclusively use cloud services from a U.S.-based tech company. That may not continue as sovereignty pressures grow.

“The American companies are going to have to address it,” Curran said. “It is a growing issue.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dbloom/2025/09/17/eurovision-facing-possible-boycotts-over-gaza-disputes/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

Author: Jasper De Maere , OTC Strategist at Wintertermute Compiled by: Tim, PANews The macroeconomic environment remains supportive, with positive events such as interest rate cuts, the end of quantitative tightening, and stock indices nearing high levels occurring one after another. However, the crypto market continues to lag behind as post-Federal Reserve policy meeting liquidity is waning. Global liquidity continues to expand, but funds are not flowing into the crypto market. ETF inflows have stagnated, decentralized AI activity has dried up, and only stablecoins are maintaining growth. Leverage has been cleared, and the market structure appears healthy, but a rebound in ETF or DAT funds would be the key signal for a liquidity recovery and the start of a potential catch-up rally. Macroeconomic Status Quo Last week, the market experienced volatility due to the Federal Reserve's rate cut, the FOMC meeting minutes, and earnings reports from several US technology companies. We saw the expected 25 basis point rate cut, officially concluding quantitative tightening, and the earnings of the "Big Seven" US stocks were generally positive. However, market volatility occurred after Powell downplayed the near certainty of another rate cut in December. The probability of a rate cut, which had been priced in by the market before the meeting (95%), has now fallen to 68%, prompting traders to reassess their strategies and triggering a rapid shift towards risk aversion. This sell-off didn't seem driven by panic, but rather resembled position adjustments. Some investors had over-bet on a rise before the event, creating a classic "sell the news" situation, as the market had already fully priced in the 25 basis point rate cut. The stock market subsequently stabilized quickly, but the cryptocurrency market did not see a synchronized rebound. Since then, BTC and ETH have been trading sideways, hovering around $107,000 and $3,700 respectively as of this writing. Altcoins have also exhibited a volatile pattern, with their excess gains primarily driven by short-term narratives. Compared to other asset classes, cryptocurrencies are the worst-performing asset class. From an index perspective, crypto assets in a broad sense experienced a significant sell-off last week, with the GMCI-30 index falling 12%. Most sectors closed lower. The gaming sector plummeted 21%. Layer 2 network sector plunges 19% The meme coin sector declined by 18%. Mid-cap and small-cap tokens fell by approximately 15%-16%. Only the AI (-3%) and DePIN (-4%) sectors showed relative resilience, mainly due to the strong performance of TAO tokens and AI proxy concept coins in the early part of last week. Overall, this volatility seems more like a money-driven phenomenon, consistent with the tightening liquidity following the Fed's decision, rather than caused by fundamental factors. So why are cryptocurrencies lagging behind while global risk assets are rising? In short: liquidity. But it's not a lack of liquidity, but rather a problem of where it flows. Global liquidity is clearly expanding. Central banks are intervening in relatively strong rather than weak markets, a situation that has only occurred a few times in the past, usually followed by a strong surge in risk appetite. The problem is that this new liquidity is not flowing into the crypto market as it has in the past. Stablecoin supply continues to climb steadily (up 50% year-to-date, adding $100 billion), but Bitcoin ETF inflows have stagnated since the summer, with assets under management hovering around $150 billion. The once-booming crypto treasury DAT has fallen silent, and related concept stocks listed on exchanges like Nasdaq have seen a significant drop in trading volume. Of the three major funding engines driving the market in the first half of this year, only stablecoins are still playing a role. ETF funding has peaked, DAT activity has dried up, and although overall liquidity remains ample, the share flowing into the crypto market has shrunk significantly. In other words, the tap for funds hasn't been turned off; it's just that the funds have flowed elsewhere. The novelty of ETFs has worn off, allocation ratios have become more normalized, and retail investors' funds have flowed elsewhere, turning to chase the trends in stocks, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. Our Viewpoint The stock market performance proves that the market environment remains strong; liquidity has simply not yet been transmitted to the crypto market. Although the market is still digesting the 10/11 liquidation, the overall structure remains robust—leverage has been cleared, volatility is under control, and the macroeconomic environment is supportive. Bitcoin continues to act as a market anchor thanks to stable ETF inflows and tight exchange supply, while Ethereum and some L1 and L2 tokens have begun to show signs of relative strength. While a growing number of voices on crypto social media are attributing the price weakness to the four-year cycle theory, this concept is no longer truly applicable. In mature markets, the miner supply and halving mechanisms that once drove cycles have long since failed; the core factor truly determining price performance is now liquidity. The macroeconomic environment continues to provide strong support—the interest rate cut cycle has begun, quantitative tightening has ended, and the stock market is frequently hitting new highs—but the crypto market has lagged behind, primarily due to the lack of effective liquidity inflows. Compared to the three major drivers of capital inflows last year and in the first half of this year (ETFs, stablecoins, and DeFi yield assets), only stablecoins are currently showing a healthy trend. Close monitoring of ETF inflows and DAT activity will be key indicators, as these are likely to be the earliest signals of liquidity returning to the crypto market.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:50