Written by Yin Chen; Edited by Deng Yongyun Source: Bloomberg Businessweek In 2011, Liu Peng, who was working on the WeChat Pay team at the time, bought his first Bitcoin.Written by Yin Chen; Edited by Deng Yongyun Source: Bloomberg Businessweek In 2011, Liu Peng, who was working on the WeChat Pay team at the time, bought his first Bitcoin.

Exclusive interview with JD.com CoinChain CEO: It is expected to obtain a license and launch a stable currency in early Q4. Bitcoin was first purchased in 2011

2025/06/18 13:43

Written by Yin Chen; Edited by Deng Yongyun

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek

In 2011, Liu Peng, who was working on the WeChat Pay team at the time, bought his first Bitcoin. He was not speculating in cryptocurrencies, but rather questioning whether this cryptocurrency, which had no anchor, was a scam. More than a decade later, he led his team to study stablecoins. But this time, his goal was not to buy, but to issue stablecoins.

In early June this year, Liu Peng, CEO of Jingdong Coinlink (hereinafter referred to as "Jingdong Coinlink"), accepted an exclusive interview with Bloomberg Businessweek/Chinese Edition. In the interview, he emphasized that stablecoins are not equivalent to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, but are similar to mobile payments, both of which are "payment tools." As a "veteran" in the payment industry, Liu Peng was deeply involved in the design and promotion of the product as a core member of "WeChat Pay." Since then, he has been responsible for payment business in large companies such as Huawei. Today, Liu Peng said that he has captured a "feeling" similar to the eve of the mobile payment blowout-in his view, payment-type stablecoins will play a "disruptive" and positive role in scenarios such as international trade as the new financial infrastructure of the Web3 era.

Decentralization, low transfer costs, transparent and traceable transactions... Stablecoins anchored to fiat currencies are moving from the crypto world to the broader traditional financial system with their many advantages. On May 30, Hong Kong officially gazetted the Stablecoin Ordinance, marking that this international financial center will clearly regulate stablecoin activities related to Hong Kong and the Hong Kong dollar through a licensing system. As early as December 2023, Hong Kong announced that it would implement a licensing system for issuers of fiat stablecoins; in July 2024, a total of three institutions, including JD Coin Chain, entered the stablecoin issuer sandbox (hereinafter referred to as the "sandbox") launched by the HKMA to conduct stablecoin-related tests.

Liu Peng revealed that the scenario testing of JD Coin Chain in the "sandbox" is progressing smoothly, and it plans to launch stablecoins anchored to the Hong Kong dollar and other currencies respectively.

JD Coin Chain was registered in Hong Kong in March 2024 and is a subsidiary of JD Technology Group, which is a business group of JD Group (9618.HK), a leading e-commerce company in the Mainland. Although it was established in Hong Kong for a short time, Liu Peng believes that one of the first-mover advantages of JD Coin Chain is that it has a "cold start" scenario from zero to one, that is, the JD e-commerce ecosystem. The group did not disclose the specific number of third-party merchants on the platform. When Liu Peng participated in the Hong Kong Fintech Week in October 2024, he mentioned that if compliant stablecoins are issued, "massive merchants on the JD platform" can use stablecoins to improve efficiency in upstream and downstream settlements, and manage funds more flexibly overseas.

In fact, in a market where USDT and USDC, two major US dollar stablecoins, account for more than 80%, stablecoins issued by licensed issuers in Hong Kong need to find other attractions, including usage scenarios, in addition to the "compliance" advantage. Among them, cross-border payments are undoubtedly a place where many stablecoin issuers "show their magic". At the same time, retail payments also have positive significance in improving the market penetration and brand building of stablecoins.

The Stablecoin Regulations will officially come into effect on August 1 this year. Globally, Singapore, the European Union, the United States and other places have successively brought stablecoins with payment nature under regulation, and the current stablecoin market of about US$250 billion is becoming hot.

Looking ahead, will compliant stablecoins promote a paradigm shift in payments, allowing mobile payments that previously moved from “offline to online” to further evolve from “online to on-chain”? Can Hong Kong, which has rapidly enacted legislation, use stablecoins to consolidate and enhance its key position in international trade? In an era where multiple currency-pegged stablecoins coexist, how will the global payment and financial systems change?

In May this year, JD.com's stablecoin conducted the second phase of self-testing in the "sandbox". What is the latest progress?

As of early June, we have mainly tested the Hong Kong dollar stablecoin, and will test other fiat stablecoins later. Based on market demand, we expect the two stablecoins to be issued at the same time. Unlike the first phase, which mainly tested product functions and technical details, the second phase focuses on testing the use of stablecoins in three practical scenarios: cross-border payments, investment transactions, and retail payments.

In the cross-border payment scenario, we plan to expand users through both direct customer acquisition and indirect customer acquisition (such as cooperation with compliant wholesalers). In the investment and trading scenario, we are negotiating cooperation with global compliant exchanges to launch JD Stablecoin in different regions. In terms of retail, the first to land is JD Global Sales Hong Kong and Macau Station, when users can be the first to use stablecoins to shop in JD's self-operated e-commerce scenarios.

When does JD CoinChain expect to obtain a stablecoin issuer license and list stablecoins on compliant exchanges? What are your plans for the initial issuance scale?

The specific timeline depends on regulation. We expect to obtain the license in early Q4 of this year and launch JD Stablecoin at the same time. JD Stablecoin will be issued on the public chain, and anyone can publicly view the issuance volume and other data.

Currently, the most popular application scenario for stablecoins is cross-border payments. A large number of transactions in this scenario already use USDT and USDC. How can compliant stablecoins issued in Hong Kong gain a foothold in this market?

First of all, "compliance" itself is the core competitiveness. As the regulations are implemented and the business is promoted, the market's understanding of this will gradually mature. As a newly issued compliant stablecoin, the goal of JD Stablecoin is not to "roll" in scenarios such as Crypto Native or investment transactions, but to open up a new "battlefield", that is, to connect the traditional cross-border trade settlement market. This market has a large number of physical enterprises, cross-border trade participants, payment technology companies, etc., and they all need safe, compliant, transparent and auditable stablecoin services. Therefore, whether it is product design or customer development methods, we will have a certain degree of targeting. We expect that international trade in Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, South America and Europe may first use stablecoins issued in Hong Kong for payment and settlement.

Many financial technology companies have achieved cost reduction and efficiency improvement in cross-border payments through blockchain technology and localization strategies. Recently, the founder of a leading cross-border payment company has questioned that stablecoins have limited value in cross-border transactions of G10 currencies. What do you think of this view?

Stablecoins are a systematic project, not just a product. The competitiveness of compliant stablecoins lies not only in low cost, high efficiency and good experience, but also in the stable custody mechanism, secure clearing and settlement channels and reliable operation logic to protect the rights and interests of holders. As a stablecoin issuer, we are also willing to cooperate with cross-border payment companies to build a stablecoin ecosystem.

In the JD ecosystem, which links will be the first to apply stablecoins? In addition to JD's existing ecosystem, how to improve the market acceptance of JD's stablecoins?

JD’s stablecoin will be the first payment and settlement platform for the global sales and collection scenarios in the JD ecosystem. In addition to the JD ecosystem, given the differences in scenario characteristics, transaction timeliness, and fund settlement logic in different industries, we plan to tailor-make stablecoin payment solutions for different industries. Currently, JD’s stablecoin reduces the transfer time from several days to seconds, reduces the cost by at least half compared to traditional transfers, and the on-chain fund turnover is also faster. These advantages are believed to attract international trade participants to adopt JD’s stablecoin.

Speaking of capital turnover, we are curious about how supply chain finance-related services related to cross-border payments will evolve in the era of stablecoin payments?

Stablecoin issuers can only issue, but cannot engage in pledge, lending, or interest payments. Therefore, for supply chain financial services, we will discuss cooperation with licensed institutions with relevant qualifications. From the perspective of solution design, we are sorting out the scenarios of JD International Logistics. In theory, under the premise of authorization by all parties, SMEs going overseas can put data such as (overseas) warehouse orders on the chain, and use stablecoins to process payments and financing, which will significantly improve the efficiency of the entire process. Of course, everything is subject to relevant laws and compliance requirements.

As for payments, what do you think are the similarities and differences between the current stablecoin payments and the mobile payments you studied several years ago?

Many people think of payment stablecoins as cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, which are completely different. Web3 stablecoins, like Web2 mobile payments, are essentially payment tools that aim to reduce costs and increase efficiency, improve user experience, and promote inclusive finance through advanced technologies and business models. Mobile payments boosted the rapid development of the mobile Internet industry, so will payment stablecoins, as Web3 infrastructure, play the same role?

From a technical perspective, unlike the centralized mobile payment, stablecoins are based on a decentralized technical architecture; from a product structure perspective, stablecoins also have an additional issuance system compared to products such as WeChat Pay. Because of this, the regulation of stablecoins is relatively complex and cannot rely solely on compliance in a single region, but must be coordinated with global compliance.

Especially in mainland China, mobile payments have almost "replaced" cash, so where might the "critical point" between stablecoins and traditional financial infrastructure be?

In just five years, mobile payment has surpassed cash in terms of transaction volume, user coverage, and scenario penetration. One of the core driving factors is the low-cost popularization of QR codes. From setting up expensive POS machines to printing a few QR code stickers, the sharp decline in payment settlement costs has, to a certain extent, promoted the full access of small and micro merchants to mobile payments. It may be too absolute to say that stablecoins can replace the current financial infrastructure 100%, but there are indeed many physical financial service scenarios that will undergo drastic changes. From a To B perspective, large transactions may be the first to accept stablecoins, especially in cross-border payment scenarios with high friction costs, large exchange rate fluctuations, and long time; from a To C perspective, to thoroughly stimulate users' motivation to use stablecoins for payment, phenomenal products and applications such as "WeChat Red Packets" in "WeChat Pay" may be needed.

As a practitioner, how do you think the ecosystem of Hong Kong's stablecoin industry should be improved?

The key is to establish a risk-based, pragmatic and flexible open ecosystem in accordance with the requirements of the Stablecoin Ordinance, in which regulators, issuers, wholesalers, scenario parties, users and investors all need to cooperate with each other. Fund settlement is both the last link and the beginning of all business. We need to seize this breakthrough and leverage Hong Kong's role as an international financial center and trade center to expand the circulation and use of stablecoins issued in Hong Kong in multiple regions, and further build Hong Kong into an international stablecoin settlement hub.

Hong Kong is not only a global trade center, but also an offshore RMB hub. Will an offshore RMB stablecoin be issued here?

In terms of product technology, there is little difference between issuing offshore RMB stablecoins and Hong Kong dollar stablecoins. Moreover, the potential application scenarios of offshore RMB stablecoins are already available, such as the Belt and Road Initiative. JD Coin Chain has always supported and promoted the issuance of offshore RMB stablecoins in the future, but we need to consider not only business logic, but also comprehensive considerations from aspects such as legal compliance. In the end, whether offshore RMB stablecoins can be implemented still depends on mainland supervision.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know

Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know

BitcoinWorld Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know Are you wondering how the UK’s new stablecoin regulations will affect your cryptocurrency activities? The Bank of England just announced that their approach to stablecoin regulations will closely mirror the United States’ framework. This crucial development signals a coordinated global effort to bring stability and security to the digital asset space. What Do the New Stablecoin Regulations Mean for You? According to Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden, the Bank of England plans to implement specific holding limits as part of their stablecoin regulations. These limits include temporary caps of £20,000 for individual users and £10 million for corporations. This approach ensures that the UK’s stablecoin regulations maintain consistency with international standards while protecting consumers. The alignment of stablecoin regulations between the UK and US represents a significant step toward global cryptocurrency standardization. Moreover, this coordinated effort helps prevent regulatory arbitrage and creates a more predictable environment for businesses operating in both markets. Why Are Stablecoin Regulations So Important? Stablecoin regulations serve multiple critical purposes in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. First, they provide consumer protection against potential market manipulation and fraud. Second, they establish clear guidelines for businesses operating in this space. Finally, proper stablecoin regulations help maintain financial stability by ensuring these digital assets don’t pose systemic risks. Consumer Protection: Limits prevent excessive exposure to single assets Market Confidence: Clear rules encourage institutional participation Financial Stability: Prevents systemic risks from unregulated growth International Cooperation: Aligned approaches reduce regulatory conflicts How Will These Stablecoin Regulations Impact the Market? The implementation of these stablecoin regulations will likely have immediate effects on how users and businesses interact with digital assets. The £20,000 individual limit means retail investors must diversify their stablecoin holdings across multiple providers or assets. Similarly, the £10 million corporate cap requires larger entities to implement sophisticated treasury management strategies. These stablecoin regulations also create opportunities for innovation in custody solutions and risk management tools. Financial technology companies can develop products that help users comply with the new requirements while maximizing their operational efficiency within the regulatory framework. What Challenges Do Stablecoin Regulations Present? While the alignment of stablecoin regulations between the UK and US provides clarity, it also introduces certain challenges. Market participants must adapt to new compliance requirements and reporting standards. Additionally, the temporary nature of the holding limits means businesses need flexible systems that can accommodate future regulatory changes. However, the benefits of having clear stablecoin regulations outweigh these transitional challenges. The framework provides much-needed certainty for investors and businesses alike, potentially accelerating mainstream adoption of digital assets. Key Takeaways from the New Stablecoin Regulations The Bank of England’s announcement about stablecoin regulations marks a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency industry. By aligning with US approaches, the UK demonstrates its commitment to fostering a secure and innovative digital asset ecosystem. These stablecoin regulations balance innovation with necessary safeguards, creating a foundation for sustainable growth. As these stablecoin regulations take effect, market participants should prepare for increased compliance requirements while recognizing the long-term benefits of regulatory clarity. The coordinated approach between major financial centers sets a positive precedent for global cryptocurrency regulation. Frequently Asked Questions When will the new stablecoin regulations take effect? The Bank of England hasn’t announced a specific implementation date, but the framework is expected to be introduced in the coming months following further consultation with industry stakeholders. How do the UK stablecoin regulations compare to other countries? The UK’s approach closely mirrors US regulations, creating alignment between two major financial markets. This coordination helps prevent regulatory fragmentation and supports global cryptocurrency adoption. Can individuals hold more than £20,000 in stablecoins? The £20,000 limit applies per individual user per service provider. Users can potentially hold additional stablecoins with different regulated providers, though they should monitor their overall exposure. Will these regulations affect existing stablecoin holdings? Existing holdings will likely need to comply with the new limits once the regulations take effect. Users should prepare to adjust their portfolios accordingly during any transition period. Do these regulations apply to all types of stablecoins? The framework primarily targets fiat-backed stablecoins, which maintain reserves in traditional currencies. Other types of stablecoins may face different regulatory treatment based on their underlying structures. How will enforcement of these regulations work? The Bank of England and Financial Conduct Authority will jointly oversee compliance, with authorized firms required to implement systems that ensure adherence to the holding limits and other requirements. Found this analysis of stablecoin regulations helpful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand these important regulatory developments. Your shares help spread valuable information throughout the cryptocurrency community. To learn more about the latest cryptocurrency trends, explore our article on key developments shaping digital assets institutional adoption. This post Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/06 03:55
Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy

Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy

BitcoinWorld Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy A significant event has captured the attention of the crypto community: a massive Richard Heart ETH transfer. An address widely linked to Richard Heart, the prominent founder of the crypto project HEX, recently moved a staggering 27,449 ETH. This substantial sum was first shifted to a new address and is now being transferred into Tornado Cash, according to reports from Onchain Lens. This development immediately sparked widespread discussion and speculation across the digital asset landscape. What’s Behind the Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer? The recent movement of such a large amount of Ethereum by an address associated with Richard Heart is undeniably a headline-grabbing event. For context, 27,449 ETH represents a considerable value in the current market, making any such transaction noteworthy. The initial transfer to a new address often precedes further actions, and in this case, the destination is particularly intriguing: Tornado Cash. This substantial Richard Heart ETH transfer raises immediate questions about its purpose. Was it for enhanced privacy, or are there other strategic reasons at play? The crypto world is buzzing with theories as market participants try to decipher the motivations behind this significant move. Understanding Tornado Cash: A Tool for Privacy or Controversy? To fully grasp the implications of this event, it is crucial to understand Tornado Cash. Simply put, Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol designed to enhance transaction privacy on the Ethereum blockchain. It achieves this by mixing various cryptocurrency deposits from different users, making it extremely difficult to trace the origin and destination of funds. Think of it as a digital blender for crypto assets. However, Tornado Cash has also been at the center of considerable controversy. While it serves legitimate purposes for individuals seeking financial privacy, it has unfortunately been exploited by bad actors for money laundering and obfuscating illicit funds. This dual nature means any large deposit, especially a Richard Heart ETH transfer, inevitably attracts scrutiny. Why Does This Richard Heart ETH Transfer Matter for HEX and Beyond? Richard Heart is not just any crypto figure; he is the outspoken founder of HEX, a project that has cultivated a dedicated, albeit sometimes controversial, following. His actions are often viewed through the lens of their potential impact on HEX and his other ventures, like PulseChain. Therefore, a significant move like this Richard Heart ETH transfer naturally leads to speculation within his community and the broader crypto market. The implications extend beyond just HEX. This event reignites the ongoing debate about privacy tools in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space. It highlights the tension between individual financial privacy and regulatory demands for transparency. Here are some key points: Privacy Concerns: For some, using Tornado Cash is a fundamental right to financial privacy, protecting transactions from unwanted surveillance. Regulatory Scrutiny: Regulators globally are increasingly concerned about services that can obscure fund flows, often citing national security and anti-money laundering (AML) concerns. Community Perception: Such transfers can influence public perception of a project founder and, by extension, the projects they lead. The Broader Impact: Transparency vs. Anonymity in Crypto The crypto world is built on principles of decentralization and, for many, anonymity. However, as the industry matures, the calls for greater transparency from traditional financial institutions and governments grow louder. The Richard Heart ETH transfer into Tornado Cash serves as a stark reminder of this fundamental clash. This incident will likely fuel further discussions on how to balance these competing ideals. It also prompts questions about the future of privacy-enhancing technologies and how they will be integrated into a more regulated crypto ecosystem. Developers and users alike continue to navigate this complex landscape, seeking solutions that uphold core crypto values while addressing legitimate concerns. What Comes Next for the Richard Heart ETH Transfer? While the funds have entered Tornado Cash, the ultimate destination and purpose of this Richard Heart ETH transfer remain unknown. Onchain analysis can track funds into Tornado Cash, but tracing them out to a specific individual becomes incredibly challenging. This is precisely the design of the protocol. The crypto community will undoubtedly continue to monitor any further on-chain movements that might shed more light on this situation. For now, the event serves as a powerful illustration of the ongoing dynamics between high-profile crypto figures, significant wealth, and the ever-present tools for transaction privacy. A Compelling Summary of the Unfolding Event In conclusion, the substantial Richard Heart ETH transfer of 27,449 ETH to Tornado Cash is a development that underscores several critical aspects of the cryptocurrency world. It highlights the power of on-chain analytics to uncover significant transactions, the role of privacy-enhancing protocols like Tornado Cash, and the ongoing dialogue surrounding transparency and anonymity in digital assets. While the motivations behind this particular transfer remain speculative, its occurrence reinforces the complex and evolving nature of the crypto ecosystem. The community watches closely, pondering the long-term implications for HEX, Richard Heart, and the broader push for financial privacy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Who is Richard Heart?A: Richard Heart is the founder of the cryptocurrency project HEX and PulseChain. He is a prominent and often controversial figure in the crypto space. Q: What is Tornado Cash?A: Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol on Ethereum that enhances transaction privacy by mixing crypto funds from multiple users, making it difficult to trace individual transactions. Q: How much ETH was transferred by the address linked to Richard Heart?A: An address suspected of belonging to Richard Heart moved 27,449 ETH to a new address, which is now being transferred to Tornado Cash. Q: Why is this Richard Heart ETH transfer significant?A: It’s significant due to the large amount of ETH involved, Richard Heart’s high profile, and the use of Tornado Cash, which sparks debates about privacy, transparency, and regulatory scrutiny in crypto. Q: Does this mean the funds are untraceable?A: While funds entering Tornado Cash are difficult to trace to their ultimate recipient, on-chain analytics can confirm their entry into the mixing service. Did this deep dive into the Richard Heart ETH transfer spark your interest? Share this article with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to keep the conversation going! Your insights contribute to a more informed crypto community. To learn more about the latest explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum price action. This post Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/06 04:00