Fed’s Waller suggests a rate cut in December, while those who prefer strict policies are pushing for a break.Fed’s Waller suggests a rate cut in December, while those who prefer strict policies are pushing for a break.

Fed’s Waller doubles down on rate cut expectations

2025/11/01 15:20

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller has reaffirmed his support for a rate cut at the Fed’s December meeting, citing softening labor markets and easing inflation trends as key factors.

In an interview, Waller said, “The biggest concern we have right now is the labor market,” he told Larry Kudlow on Fox Business Network. “We know inflation is going to come back down, so this is why I’m still advocating that we cut policy rates in December, because that’s what all the data is telling me to do.”

A group of Federal Reserve bank presidents shared their concerns on Friday, October 31, regarding the US central bank’s decision to reduce interest rates this week.

Sources pointed out that the situation illustrates disagreement among Fed policymakers, creating difficulties for their chair, Jerome Powell. This is because he is required to find common ground during his final six months in the position.

Fed’s disagreement on rate cuts sparks controversy 

Following the disagreement among Fed policymakers, analysts noted that it is common to have conflicting views on policy, especially when economic data are unclear. However, they argued that the Fed’s move to openly discuss their disagreements and clearly focus on what they should decide at their next meeting, scheduled for December 9-10, was significant.

In the meantime, during a banking conference, Lorie Logan, the president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, mentioned that she did not see a reason to lower rates this week. Based on her argument, supporting another rate cut will be difficult unless there is clear evidence that inflation will drop faster than expected or the job market will decelerate sharply.

The president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Beth Hammack, also weighed in on the situation. At the same conference, Hammack mentioned, “Considering our recent decision, I think we are close to my idea of neutrality: we’re only slightly restrictive if at all.” 

Although she did not participate in this year’s vote on policy, like Logan, the CEO disagreed with the rate cut this week, and both will have the right to vote next year. Hammack expressed her belief that they need to maintain some level of restriction to help bring inflation back down to their target.

On the other hand, Waller, who has a permanent vote and is one of the candidates that US President Donald Trump could choose for Fed chair when Powell’s term ends in May, expressed a very different perspective. According to him, the country’s main current challenge is the job market. 

Interestingly, both Waller and Logan suggested that Trump’s tariffs are unlikely to lead to a surge in inflation. However, while Waller believes that this backs the idea of rate cuts, Logan expressed her concerns about the increasing costs of services.

They also agreed that the absence of official economic data during the government shutdown does not cause the uncertainty Powell talked about earlier this week as a reason to hold off on rate cuts.

Waller stresses the importance of further rate cuts

Logan mentioned that private-sector figures, state-level unemployment entitlements, and the Fed’s own business and societal surveys give visibility into the state of the economy.

She believed these elements support her argument that the job market is not slowing down enough to necessitate the Fed’s intervention, especially because inflation continues to be too high and is taking too long to hit the Fed’s 2% target.

“The fog story has to end: it may imply that you need to take it easy, but it doesn’t mean you should stop completely,” Waller said. According to him, it is advisable to exercise caution due to economic uncertainties, but this situation should not prompt policymakers to halt rate cuts; instead, he urges that the best way to handle policy is to continue making cuts.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

Author: Jasper De Maere , OTC Strategist at Wintertermute Compiled by: Tim, PANews The macroeconomic environment remains supportive, with positive events such as interest rate cuts, the end of quantitative tightening, and stock indices nearing high levels occurring one after another. However, the crypto market continues to lag behind as post-Federal Reserve policy meeting liquidity is waning. Global liquidity continues to expand, but funds are not flowing into the crypto market. ETF inflows have stagnated, decentralized AI activity has dried up, and only stablecoins are maintaining growth. Leverage has been cleared, and the market structure appears healthy, but a rebound in ETF or DAT funds would be the key signal for a liquidity recovery and the start of a potential catch-up rally. Macroeconomic Status Quo Last week, the market experienced volatility due to the Federal Reserve's rate cut, the FOMC meeting minutes, and earnings reports from several US technology companies. We saw the expected 25 basis point rate cut, officially concluding quantitative tightening, and the earnings of the "Big Seven" US stocks were generally positive. However, market volatility occurred after Powell downplayed the near certainty of another rate cut in December. The probability of a rate cut, which had been priced in by the market before the meeting (95%), has now fallen to 68%, prompting traders to reassess their strategies and triggering a rapid shift towards risk aversion. This sell-off didn't seem driven by panic, but rather resembled position adjustments. Some investors had over-bet on a rise before the event, creating a classic "sell the news" situation, as the market had already fully priced in the 25 basis point rate cut. The stock market subsequently stabilized quickly, but the cryptocurrency market did not see a synchronized rebound. Since then, BTC and ETH have been trading sideways, hovering around $107,000 and $3,700 respectively as of this writing. Altcoins have also exhibited a volatile pattern, with their excess gains primarily driven by short-term narratives. Compared to other asset classes, cryptocurrencies are the worst-performing asset class. From an index perspective, crypto assets in a broad sense experienced a significant sell-off last week, with the GMCI-30 index falling 12%. Most sectors closed lower. The gaming sector plummeted 21%. Layer 2 network sector plunges 19% The meme coin sector declined by 18%. Mid-cap and small-cap tokens fell by approximately 15%-16%. Only the AI (-3%) and DePIN (-4%) sectors showed relative resilience, mainly due to the strong performance of TAO tokens and AI proxy concept coins in the early part of last week. Overall, this volatility seems more like a money-driven phenomenon, consistent with the tightening liquidity following the Fed's decision, rather than caused by fundamental factors. So why are cryptocurrencies lagging behind while global risk assets are rising? In short: liquidity. But it's not a lack of liquidity, but rather a problem of where it flows. Global liquidity is clearly expanding. Central banks are intervening in relatively strong rather than weak markets, a situation that has only occurred a few times in the past, usually followed by a strong surge in risk appetite. The problem is that this new liquidity is not flowing into the crypto market as it has in the past. Stablecoin supply continues to climb steadily (up 50% year-to-date, adding $100 billion), but Bitcoin ETF inflows have stagnated since the summer, with assets under management hovering around $150 billion. The once-booming crypto treasury DAT has fallen silent, and related concept stocks listed on exchanges like Nasdaq have seen a significant drop in trading volume. Of the three major funding engines driving the market in the first half of this year, only stablecoins are still playing a role. ETF funding has peaked, DAT activity has dried up, and although overall liquidity remains ample, the share flowing into the crypto market has shrunk significantly. In other words, the tap for funds hasn't been turned off; it's just that the funds have flowed elsewhere. The novelty of ETFs has worn off, allocation ratios have become more normalized, and retail investors' funds have flowed elsewhere, turning to chase the trends in stocks, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. Our Viewpoint The stock market performance proves that the market environment remains strong; liquidity has simply not yet been transmitted to the crypto market. Although the market is still digesting the 10/11 liquidation, the overall structure remains robust—leverage has been cleared, volatility is under control, and the macroeconomic environment is supportive. Bitcoin continues to act as a market anchor thanks to stable ETF inflows and tight exchange supply, while Ethereum and some L1 and L2 tokens have begun to show signs of relative strength. While a growing number of voices on crypto social media are attributing the price weakness to the four-year cycle theory, this concept is no longer truly applicable. In mature markets, the miner supply and halving mechanisms that once drove cycles have long since failed; the core factor truly determining price performance is now liquidity. The macroeconomic environment continues to provide strong support—the interest rate cut cycle has begun, quantitative tightening has ended, and the stock market is frequently hitting new highs—but the crypto market has lagged behind, primarily due to the lack of effective liquidity inflows. Compared to the three major drivers of capital inflows last year and in the first half of this year (ETFs, stablecoins, and DeFi yield assets), only stablecoins are currently showing a healthy trend. Close monitoring of ETF inflows and DAT activity will be key indicators, as these are likely to be the earliest signals of liquidity returning to the crypto market.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:50