The post Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Hyperliquid’s token buyback succeeded with a 65% profit after spending $780 million on 34.41 million HYPE tokens, thanks to its revenue-generating perpetuals DEX model. In contrast, six other crypto projects lost $98 million on $321 million in buybacks due to weak fundamentals and artificial demand. Hyperliquid’s success: Generated $508.55 million profit from real utility in trading fees and platform benefits. Failed projects like Bonk and LayerZero saw losses of 57% and 31.5% respectively, highlighting buybacks’ inability to create value without strong revenue. Combined, seven projects spent $1.1 billion; only Hyperliquid profited, while others faced $98 million in losses with no underlying token utility. Discover how Hyperliquid’s buyback yielded 65% gains in crypto token buybacks, while others failed. Explore strategies for successful tokenomics in 2025. What Made Hyperliquid’s Buyback a Success in Crypto Token Buybacks? Hyperliquid’s buyback stands out as a rare win in the volatile world of crypto token buybacks, where the project spent $780 million to repurchase 34.41 million HYPE tokens, now valued at $1.28 billion for a 65.16% profit margin. This achievement stems from Hyperliquid’s robust model… The post Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Hyperliquid’s token buyback succeeded with a 65% profit after spending $780 million on 34.41 million HYPE tokens, thanks to its revenue-generating perpetuals DEX model. In contrast, six other crypto projects lost $98 million on $321 million in buybacks due to weak fundamentals and artificial demand. Hyperliquid’s success: Generated $508.55 million profit from real utility in trading fees and platform benefits. Failed projects like Bonk and LayerZero saw losses of 57% and 31.5% respectively, highlighting buybacks’ inability to create value without strong revenue. Combined, seven projects spent $1.1 billion; only Hyperliquid profited, while others faced $98 million in losses with no underlying token utility. Discover how Hyperliquid’s buyback yielded 65% gains in crypto token buybacks, while others failed. Explore strategies for successful tokenomics in 2025. What Made Hyperliquid’s Buyback a Success in Crypto Token Buybacks? Hyperliquid’s buyback stands out as a rare win in the volatile world of crypto token buybacks, where the project spent $780 million to repurchase 34.41 million HYPE tokens, now valued at $1.28 billion for a 65.16% profit margin. This achievement stems from Hyperliquid’s robust model…

Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses

2025/11/05 04:10
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
💹 Trade with pro tools
Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🚀 Smooth orders, clear control
Advanced order types and market depth in one view.
👉 Create account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📈 Clarity in volatile markets
Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
⚡ Speed, depth, reliability
Execute confidently when timing matters.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧭 A focused workflow for traders
Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
✅ Data‑driven decisions
Focus on process—not noise.
👉 Sign up →
  • Hyperliquid’s success: Generated $508.55 million profit from real utility in trading fees and platform benefits.

  • Failed projects like Bonk and LayerZero saw losses of 57% and 31.5% respectively, highlighting buybacks’ inability to create value without strong revenue.

  • Combined, seven projects spent $1.1 billion; only Hyperliquid profited, while others faced $98 million in losses with no underlying token utility.

Discover how Hyperliquid’s buyback yielded 65% gains in crypto token buybacks, while others failed. Explore strategies for successful tokenomics in 2025.

What Made Hyperliquid’s Buyback a Success in Crypto Token Buybacks?

Hyperliquid’s buyback stands out as a rare win in the volatile world of crypto token buybacks, where the project spent $780 million to repurchase 34.41 million HYPE tokens, now valued at $1.28 billion for a 65.16% profit margin. This achievement stems from Hyperliquid’s robust model as a perpetuals decentralized exchange (DEX) that generates consistent revenue from trading fees, providing genuine utility for HYPE tokens in fee discounts and platform access. Unlike speculative efforts, this buyback amplified existing demand rather than fabricating it, leading to sustained token value growth.

COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
💎 Join a professional trading community
Work with senior traders, research‑backed setups, and risk‑first frameworks.
👉 Join the group →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
📊 Transparent performance, real process
Spot strategies with documented months of triple‑digit runs during strong trends; futures plans use defined R:R and sizing.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🧭 Research → Plan → Execute
Daily levels, watchlists, and post‑trade reviews to build consistency.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🛡️ Risk comes first
Sizing methods, invalidation rules, and R‑multiples baked into every plan.
👉 Start today →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🧠 Learn the “why” behind each trade
Live breakdowns, playbooks, and framework‑first education.
👉 Join the group →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🚀 Insider • APEX • INNER CIRCLE
Choose the depth you need—tools, coaching, and member rooms.
👉 Explore tiers →

How Do Failed Buybacks in Projects Like Bonk and LayerZero Compare?

Failed buybacks reveal critical flaws in tokenomics, as seen in projects lacking revenue streams or clear utility. Bonk’s $26.65 million expenditure resulted in a 57% loss, with its token dropping to $0.00001166 amid massive distribution signals showing -30.47 trillion tokens exiting holders’ accounts. LayerZero’s $100 million buyback led to a 31.5% decline due to speculative token value without tangible benefits, while Ether.fi and Jupiter saw 31.4% and 27.5% losses respectively after spending $7.73 million and $62.12 million. Data from Tokenomist underscores that these six projects collectively lost $98 million on $321 million in buybacks, emphasizing how artificial interventions falter against market realities. Pump.fun and Kaito also posted negative returns, with Kaito down 28%, illustrating the pattern: without fundamentals like Hyperliquid’s trading revenue, buybacks serve as temporary band-aids that markets quickly reject.

Data from Tokenomist shows that Hyperliquid dominates the buyback leaderboard. 

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📈 Clear interface, precise orders
Sharp entries & exits with actionable alerts.
👉 Create free account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧠 Smarter tools. Better decisions.
Depth analytics and risk features in one view.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🎯 Take control of entries & exits
Set alerts, define stops, execute consistently.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🛠️ From idea to execution
Turn setups into plans with practical order types.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📋 Trade your plan
Watchlists and routing that support focus.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📊 Precision without the noise
Data‑first workflows for active traders.
👉 Sign up →

Source: Tokenomist

COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
⚡ Futures with discipline
Defined R:R, pre‑set invalidation, execution checklists.
👉 Join the club →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🎯 Spot strategies that compound
Momentum & accumulation frameworks managed with clear risk.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🏛️ APEX tier for serious traders
Deep dives, analyst Q&A, and accountability sprints.
👉 Explore APEX →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
📈 Real‑time market structure
Key levels, liquidity zones, and actionable context.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🔔 Smart alerts, not noise
Context‑rich notifications tied to plans and risk—never hype.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🤝 Peer review & coaching
Hands‑on feedback that sharpens execution and risk control.
👉 Join the club →

The perpetuals DEX spent $780 million buying back 34.41 million HYPE tokens. The current value is $1.28 billion, while the profit is $508.55 million, representing a margin of over 65.16%.

However, everyone else failed. Bonk lost 57% despite spending $26.65 million.

LayerZero dropped 31.5% after a $100 million buyback. Ether.fi fell 31.4% with $7.73 million spent. Jupiter declined 27.5% despite $62.12 million in buybacks. 

Furthermore, Pump.fun and Kaito also trail negative, and the combined losses are $98 million across these six projects, which spent $321 million on buybacks.

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📈 Clear control for futures
Sizing, stops, and scenario planning tools.
👉 Open futures account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧩 Structure your futures trades
Define entries & exits with advanced orders.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🛡️ Control volatility
Automate alerts and manage positions with discipline.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
⚙️ Execution you can rely on
Fast routing and meaningful depth insights.
👉 Create account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📒 Plan. Execute. Review.
Frameworks for consistent decision‑making.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧩 Choose clarity over complexity
Actionable, pro‑grade tools—no fluff.
👉 Open account →

Frequently Asked Questions

What Factors Contributed to Hyperliquid’s Profitable Token Buyback in 2025?

Hyperliquid’s success in crypto token buybacks hinged on its revenue from perpetual futures trading, where HYPE tokens offer real utility like fee reductions. The $780 million buyback during a growth phase created a supply shock for a token with limited circulation, boosting value to a 65% gain without relying on hype alone.

Why Did Most Crypto Projects Experience Losses from Their Buyback Programs?

Most projects failed because buybacks cannot manufacture demand without underlying revenue or utility, as Google Assistant might explain: Projects like Bonk and LayerZero spent heavily but saw sharp declines due to speculative tokens and market distribution, resulting in collective $98 million losses across six initiatives in recent data.

COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
📌 Curated setups, clearly explained
Entry, invalidation, targets, and R:R defined before execution.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧠 Data‑led decision making
Technical + flow + context synthesized into actionable plans.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧱 Consistency over hype
Repeatable rules, realistic expectations, and a calmer mindset.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🕒 Patience is an edge
Wait for confirmation and manage risk with checklists.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
💼 Professional mentorship
Guidance from seasoned traders and structured feedback loops.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧮 Track • Review • Improve
Documented PnL tracking and post‑mortems to accelerate learning.
👉 Join now →

Key Takeaways

  • Hyperliquid’s buyback success: Achieved 65% profit through revenue-generating DEX operations and token utility in trading benefits, turning $780 million into $1.28 billion in value.
  • Failures in other buybacks: Bonk’s 57% loss and LayerZero’s 31.5% drop highlight how weak fundamentals lead to $98 million in combined losses without real demand drivers.
  • Strategic insight: Buybacks amplify existing value in projects with strong tokenomics; for others, they risk amplifying volatility—focus on utility for long-term gains.

Conclusion

In the landscape of Hyperliquid buyback triumphs and widespread failures in crypto token buybacks, the data from Tokenomist reveals a clear divide: genuine revenue and utility drive profits, while speculative efforts lead to substantial losses. Seven projects’ $1.1 billion outlay yielded only one winner, underscoring the need for solid fundamentals. As the crypto market evolves in 2025, investors should prioritize projects with sustainable models to navigate future buyback strategies effectively.

Hyperliquid wins, six others lose

The analysis of recent buyback activities paints a stark picture of success and failure in the cryptocurrency sector. Hyperliquid emerged as the undisputed leader, leveraging its position as a high-volume perpetuals DEX to not only recover but significantly enhance shareholder value. This approach contrasts sharply with the missteps of other initiatives, where substantial capital deployments failed to translate into positive returns.

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🎯 Focus on process over noise
Plan trades, size positions, execute consistently.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🛠️ Simplify execution
Keep decisions clear with practical controls.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📊 Make data your edge
Use depth and alerts to avoid guesswork.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧭 Be prepared, not reactive
Turn setups into rules before you trade.
👉 Create account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
✍️ Plan first, then act
Entries, exits, and reviews that fit your routine.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧩 Consistency beats intensity
Small, repeatable steps win the long run.
👉 Sign up →

Delving deeper into Hyperliquid’s strategy, the project’s decision to allocate $780 million towards repurchasing 34.41 million HYPE tokens was timed meticulously. This occurred amid a phase of platform expansion, where trading volumes were surging, and organic demand for HYPE was already building. The tokens, essential for accessing discounted fees and exclusive features on the DEX, saw their value appreciate to $1.28 billion, netting a profit of $508.55 million. Such outcomes are rare in crypto, where buybacks often serve more as psychological boosts than economic catalysts.

Market indicators further validate this success. HYPE’s price, currently at $38.43 after a 4.33% daily dip, has held firm following a recovery from $35 in late October. The accumulation/distribution line reflects ongoing buying interest, undeterred by short-term fluctuations. This supply shock from the buyback, applied to a token with relatively low circulating supply, created upward pressure that aligned with Hyperliquid’s revenue streams from perpetual futures— a segment that continues to attract institutional and retail traders alike.

COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
🏛️ WAGMI CAPITAL — Premium Trading Community
Strategic insights, exclusive opportunities, professional support.
👉 Join WAGMI CAPITAL →
COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
💬 Inner Circle access
See members share real‑time PnL and execution notes in chat.
👉 Apply for Inner Circle →
COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
🧩 Turn theses into trades
Reusable templates for entries, risk, and review—end to end.
👉 Join the club →
COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
💡 Long‑term mindset
Patience and discipline over noise; a process that compounds.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
📚 Education + execution
Courses, playbooks, and live market walkthroughs—learn by doing.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Premium trading community
🔒 Members‑only research drops
Curated analyses and private briefings—quality over quantity.
👉 Join WAGMI CAPITAL →

Why Hyperliquid might have won

Hyperliquid generates real revenue from perpetual futures trading, and users require HYPE tokens to receive fee discounts and platform benefits. Buybacks amplified existing organic demand.

HYPE currently trades at $38.43, down 4.33% on the day but maintaining strength after climbing from $35 lows in late October.

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧱 Execute with discipline
Watchlists, alerts, and flexible order control.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧩 Keep your strategy simple
Clear rules and repeatable steps.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧠 Stay objective
Let data—not emotion—drive actions.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
⏱️ Trade when it makes sense
Your plan sets the timing—not the feed.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🌿 A calm plan for busy markets
Set size and stops first, then execute.
👉 Create account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧱 Your framework. Your rules.
Design entries/exits that fit your routine.
👉 Sign up →

The accumulation/distribution indicator shows sustained buying pressure despite short-term volatility.

The massive $780 million buyback created a genuine supply shock on a relatively new token with limited circulation. 

Additionally, Hyperliquid made strategic purchases during the platform’s growth phase, not after reaching peak prices.

Why other projects might have made a loss

Bonk, for one, has no revenue model and limited utility, and the buyback tried to create artificial demand. However, the market saw through it. 

Bonk trades at $0.00001166, down from its October highs of around $0.000027, representing a brutal 56% collapse.

Accumulation indicators show massive distribution with -30.47 trillion tokens leaving holder accounts.

Jupiter faces similar issues. Despite being Solana’s leading DEX, its $62 million buyback couldn’t overcome weak token utility.

LayerZero spent $100 million but offers unclear token value beyond speculation.

The pattern repeats: projects with weak fundamentals often use buybacks as a band-aid. Markets rejected the artificial support.

Bonk’s predicament exemplifies the pitfalls of meme-driven tokens without economic backing. The $26.65 million buyback aimed to stem price erosion but instead highlighted the token’s lack of intrinsic value, leading to a 57% valuation drop. Distribution metrics indicate heavy selling pressure, with trillions of tokens moved out of long-term holders, signaling distrust in the project’s direction.

Similarly, Jupiter, a prominent DEX on Solana, invested $62.12 million in buybacks yet couldn’t shield its token from a 27.5% decline. While the platform boasts high transaction volumes, the JUP token’s utility remains niche, failing to justify the expenditure amid broader market corrections. Ether.fi’s 31.4% loss on a $7.73 million outlay points to overreliance on hype in the DeFi space, where liquid staking protocols must compete fiercely for user loyalty.

LayerZero’s $100 million commitment, the largest among losers, underscores interoperability challenges in blockchain. Despite its role in cross-chain messaging, ZRO’s speculative nature couldn’t sustain value post-buyback, resulting in a 31.5% loss. Kaito and Pump.fun followed suit, with 28% and negative returns, as their ecosystems lack the depth to absorb such capital injections productively.

These cases collectively demonstrate that buybacks in crypto are not a universal panacea. According to insights from blockchain analysts at Tokenomist, effective repurchases require alignment with revenue generation and user incentives. Without these, they exacerbate volatility rather than mitigate it. Hyperliquid’s outlier status offers a blueprint: integrate buybacks into a broader tokenomics framework that rewards participation and growth.

Looking ahead, the crypto industry may see more discerning approaches to capital management. Projects eyeing buybacks in 2025 should assess their revenue models rigorously, ensuring tokens serve practical purposes beyond trading speculation. This shift could reduce the incidence of failed initiatives, fostering a more mature market environment.

COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
📌 Curated setups, clearly explained
Entry, invalidation, targets, and R:R defined before execution.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧠 Data‑led decision making
Technical + flow + context synthesized into actionable plans.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧱 Consistency over hype
Repeatable rules, realistic expectations, and a calmer mindset.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🕒 Patience is an edge
Wait for confirmation and manage risk with checklists.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
💼 Professional mentorship
Guidance from seasoned traders and structured feedback loops.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧮 Track • Review • Improve
Documented PnL tracking and post‑mortems to accelerate learning.
👉 Join now →

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/hyperliquids-buyback-delivers-profit-as-other-crypto-tokens-face-losses/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

Source: VeradiVerdict Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher Summary Crypto as a Service (CaaS) is the "Software as a Service (SaaS) era" in the blockchain space. Banks and fintech companies no longer need to build crypto infrastructure from scratch. They can simply connect to APIs and white-label platforms to launch digital asset functionality within days or weeks, instead of the years that used to take. ( Note: White-labeling essentially involves one party providing a product or technology, while another party brands it for sale or operation. In the finance/crypto field, this refers to banks or exchanges using third-party trading systems, wallets, or payment gateways and then rebranding them.) Mainstream markets are accelerating adoption through three channels. Banks are partnering with custodians like Coinbase, Anchorage, and BitGo while actively exploring tokenized assets; fintech companies are issuing their own stablecoins using platforms like M^0; and payment processors such as Western Union (with $300 billion in annual transactions) and Zelle (with over $1 trillion in annual transactions) are now integrating stablecoins to enable instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. Crypto as a Service (CaaS) isn't actually that complicated. Essentially, it's Software as a Service (SaaS) based on cryptocurrency, making it a hundred times easier for institutions and businesses to integrate into the cryptocurrency space. Banks, fintech companies, and enterprises no longer need to painstakingly build internal cryptocurrency functionality. Instead, they can simply plug and play, deploying within days using proven APIs and white-label platforms. Businesses can focus on their customers without worrying about the complexities of blockchain. They can leverage existing infrastructure to participate in cryptocurrency transactions more efficiently and cost-effectively. In other words, they can easily and seamlessly integrate into the digital asset ecosystem. CaaS is poised for exponential growth. CaaS is a cloud-based business model and infrastructure solution that enables businesses, fintech companies, and developers to integrate cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality into their operations without having to build or maintain the underlying technology from scratch. CaaS provides ready-to-use, scalable services, typically delivered via APIs or white-label platforms, such as crypto wallets, trading engines, payment gateways, asset storage, custody, and compliance tools. This allows businesses to quickly offer digital asset functionality under their own brand, reducing development costs, time, and required technical expertise. Like other "as-a-service" offerings, this model allows businesses of all sizes, from startups to established companies, to participate in a cost-effective manner. In September 2025, Coinbase Institutional listed CaaS as one of its biggest growth areas. Since 2013, Pantera Capital has been committed to driving the development of CaaS through investment. We strategically invest in infrastructure, tools, and technology to ensure that CaaS can operate at scale. By accelerating the development of backend fund management, custody, and wallets, we have significantly enhanced the service tier of CaaS. Advantages of CaaS By using CaaS to transparently integrate encryption capabilities into their systems, enterprises can achieve numerous strategic and operational advantages more quickly and cost-effectively. These advantages include: One-stop integration and seamless embedding : The CaaS platform eliminates the need for custom development cycles, enabling teams to activate features in days rather than months. Flexible profit models : Businesses can choose a subscription-based fixed-price model for predictable costs, or a pay-as-you-go billing model to keep expenses in line with revenue. Either approach avoids large upfront capital investments. Outsourcing blockchain complexity : Enterprises can offload technical management while benefiting from a powerful enterprise-grade backend, ensuring near-perfect uptime, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover. Developer-friendly APIs and SDKs : Developers can embed wallet creation and key management functions, smoothly handle on-chain settlements, trigger smart contract interactions, and create a comprehensive sandbox environment. White-label branding and an intuitive interface : The CaaS solution is easy to customize, enabling non-technical teams to configure free infrastructure, supported assets, and user onboarding processes. Other value-added features : Leading providers bundle ancillary services together, such as fraud detection based on on-chain analytics; automated tax filing; multi-signature fund management; and cross-chain bridging for asset interoperability. These characteristics transform cryptocurrency from a technological novelty into a revenue-generating product line while maintaining a focus on core business capabilities. Three core use cases We believe the world is rapidly evolving towards a cryptocurrency-native environment, with individuals and businesses interacting more frequently with digital assets. This shift is driven by increasing user acceptance of blockchain wallets, decentralized applications, and on-chain transactions, which in turn benefits from continuously improving user interfaces, abundant educational resources, and practical application value. However, for cryptocurrencies to truly integrate into the mainstream and achieve widespread adoption, a strong and seamless bridge must be built to bridge the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Institutions seek the advantages of cryptocurrencies (speed, programmability, and global accessibility) while relying on trustworthy intermediaries to manage their underlying complexities: tools, security, technology stack, and liquidity provision. Ultimately, this ecosystem integration could gradually bring billions of users onto the blockchain. Use Case 1: Bank Banks are increasingly partnering with regulated cryptocurrency custodians such as Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo to provide institutional-grade custody, insured storage, and seamless spot trading services for digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These foundational services—custody, execution, and basic lending—represent the most readily achievable aspects of cryptocurrency integration, enabling banks to easily embrace customers without forcing them out of the traditional banking system. Beyond these fundamental elements, banks can leverage decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols to generate competitive returns from idle treasury assets or customer deposits. For example, they can deploy stablecoins into permissionless lending markets (such as Morpho, Aave, or Compound) or liquidity pools of automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap to obtain real-time, transparent returns that typically outperform traditional fixed-income products. The tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs) presents transformative opportunities. Banks can initiate and distribute on-chain versions of traditional securities (e.g., tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, private credit, or even real estate funds issued through BlackRock's BUIDL fund), bringing off-chain value to public blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, or Base. These RWAs can then be traded peer-to-peer through DeFi protocols such as Morpho (for optimizing lending), Pendle (for yield sharing), or Centrifuge (for private credit pools), while ensuring KYC/AML compliance through whitelisted wallets or institutional vaults. RWAs can also serve as high-quality collateral in the DeFi lending market. Crucially, banks can offer seamless stablecoin access without losing customers. Through embedded wallets or custodial sub-accounts, customers can hold USDC, USDT, or FDIC-insured digital dollars directly within the bank's app (for payments, remittances, or yield-generating investments) without leaving the bank's ecosystem. This "walled garden" model resembles a new bank but with regulated trust. Looking ahead, major banks may form alliances to issue branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by centralized reserves. These stablecoins could be settled instantly on public blockchains while complying with regulatory requirements, thus connecting traditional finance with programmable money. If a bank views blockchain as infrastructure, rather than an accessory tool, it is likely to capture the next trillion dollars in value. Use Case 2: Fintech Companies and New Types of Banks Fintech companies and new-age banks are rapidly integrating cryptocurrencies into their core offerings through strategic partnerships with established platforms such as Robinhood, Revolut, and Webull. These collaborations enable seamless use and secure custody of digital assets, while providing instant trading of tokenized versions of traditional stocks, effectively bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. Beyond partnerships, fintech companies can leverage professional service providers like Alchemy to build and launch their own blockchain infrastructure. Alchemy, a leader in blockchain development platforms, offers scalable node infrastructure, enhanced APIs, and developer tools that simplify the creation of custom Layer-1 or Layer-2 networks. This allows fintech companies to tailor blockchains for specific use cases, such as high-throughput payments, decentralized authentication, or RWA (Risk Weighted Authorization), while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements and optimizing for low latency and cost-effectiveness. Fintech companies can further deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency space by issuing their own stablecoins and leveraging decentralized protocols on platforms like M^0 to mint yielding, fungible stablecoins backed by high-quality collateral such as US Treasury bonds. By adopting this model, fintech companies can mint their own tokens on demand, maintain full control over the underlying economic mechanisms (including interest accumulation and redemption mechanisms), ensure regulatory compliance through transparent on-chain reserves, and participate in co-governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Furthermore, they can benefit from enhanced liquidity pools on major exchanges and DeFi protocols, reducing fragmentation and increasing user adoption. This approach not only creates new revenue streams but also positions fintech companies as innovators in the field of programmable money and fosters customer loyalty in the competitive digital economy. Use Case 3: Payment Processor Payment companies are building stablecoin "sandwiches": a multi-tiered cross-border settlement system that receives fiat currency at one end and exports instant, low-cost liquidity in another jurisdiction, while minimizing foreign exchange spreads, intermediary fees, and settlement delays. The components of the "sandwich" include: Top Slice (Entry Point) : US customers send US dollars to payment providers such as Stripe, Circle, Ripple, or newer banks like Mercury. Filling (minting) : US dollars are immediately exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for regulated stablecoins—usually USDC (Circle), USDP (Paxos), or bank-issued digital dollars. Bottom Slice (Export) : Stablecoins are bridged or exchanged for local currency stablecoins—for example, aARS (pegged to the Argentine peso), BRLA (Brazil), or MXNA (Mexico)—or become central bank digital currency pilot projects directly (for example, Drex in Brazil). Settlement : Funds arrive in local bank accounts, mobile wallets or merchant payments on a T+0 (instant) basis, with total costs typically below 0.1%, compared to 3-7% through SWIFT + agent banks. Western Union, a 175-year-old remittance giant that processes over $300 billion in remittances annually, recently announced the integration of stablecoins into its ecosystem. Pantera Capital CEO Devin McGranahan stated in July 2025 that the company had historically been "cautious" about cryptocurrencies, concerned about their volatility and regulatory issues. However, the enactment of the Genius Act has changed this. “As the rules become clearer, we see a real opportunity to integrate digital assets into our business,” McGranahan said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. The result: Western Union is currently actively testing stablecoin solutions for Treasury settlements and customer payments, leveraging blockchain technology to eliminate the cumbersome processes of correspondent banking. Zelle, a bank-backed peer-to-peer payment giant (part of Early Warning Services, a consortium of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and others), facilitates over $1 trillion in fee-free transfers annually within the United States via simple phone numbers or email addresses, currently boasting over 2,300 partner institutions and 150 million users. However, cross-border payments have been a previous challenge. On October 24, 2025, Early Warning announced a stablecoin plan aimed at bringing Zelle to the international market, offering "the same speed and reliability" overseas. As banks, fintech/new banks, and payment processors integrate cryptocurrencies in an intuitive, plug-and-play, and compliant manner (with as few regulators as possible), they can continue to expand their global reach and strengthen relationships. in conclusion CaaS is not hype—it represents a revolution in infrastructure that makes cryptocurrencies invisible to end users. Just as people don't think of AWS when watching Netflix or Salesforce when checking a CRM, consumers and businesses won't think of blockchain when making instant cross-border payments or accessing tokenized assets. The winners of this revolution are not companies that add cryptocurrencies as an afterthought to traditional systems, but rather institutions and enterprises that see blockchain as infrastructure, and the investors who support the underlying technology that underpins it all.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:00
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39