The post India’s crypto investors say tax laws are unfair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. India’s crypto scene is a beautiful mess. On one hand, it’s home to one of the world’s largest communities of crypto users, a young, tech-savvy crowd keen to explore the endless possibilities of decentralized finance. Summary Crypto adoption meets heavy taxation. India has one of the world’s largest crypto user bases but enforces a harsh 30% tax on gains and 1% TDS on transactions — rules many see as punishing innovation. Lack of clarity drives frustration. With no clear framework or loss offsets, small traders face confusion and compliance burdens, while exchanges lose users to offshore platforms. A balanced approach is overdue. Allowing loss offsets, clearer reporting, and fairer treatment could turn crypto from a suspect activity into a pillar of India’s digital future. Yet on the other hand, the same country enforces some of the toughest tax rules on crypto anywhere in the world. To many, it feels like innovation is being treated with suspicion rather than support. That frustration shows in the numbers. In a recent survey of 9,000 Indian participants, approximately 84% said they believe India’s crypto tax policies are unfair. A punishing framework? They aren’t quiet about it online either. Just browse Reddit, and you’ll see people calling the rules “excessive” and arguing that “there are no other rules or regulations on it, just tax.” So who’s right? Should the government ease up, or is it right to keep a tight grip on the volatile market? The government’s rationale has been to curb speculation and protect investors. However, the absence of a coherent crypto regulatory framework only adds to the confusion. Compared to crypto tax rules in other jurisdictions, it makes you wonder… The post India’s crypto investors say tax laws are unfair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. India’s crypto scene is a beautiful mess. On one hand, it’s home to one of the world’s largest communities of crypto users, a young, tech-savvy crowd keen to explore the endless possibilities of decentralized finance. Summary Crypto adoption meets heavy taxation. India has one of the world’s largest crypto user bases but enforces a harsh 30% tax on gains and 1% TDS on transactions — rules many see as punishing innovation. Lack of clarity drives frustration. With no clear framework or loss offsets, small traders face confusion and compliance burdens, while exchanges lose users to offshore platforms. A balanced approach is overdue. Allowing loss offsets, clearer reporting, and fairer treatment could turn crypto from a suspect activity into a pillar of India’s digital future. Yet on the other hand, the same country enforces some of the toughest tax rules on crypto anywhere in the world. To many, it feels like innovation is being treated with suspicion rather than support. That frustration shows in the numbers. In a recent survey of 9,000 Indian participants, approximately 84% said they believe India’s crypto tax policies are unfair. A punishing framework? They aren’t quiet about it online either. Just browse Reddit, and you’ll see people calling the rules “excessive” and arguing that “there are no other rules or regulations on it, just tax.” So who’s right? Should the government ease up, or is it right to keep a tight grip on the volatile market? The government’s rationale has been to curb speculation and protect investors. However, the absence of a coherent crypto regulatory framework only adds to the confusion. Compared to crypto tax rules in other jurisdictions, it makes you wonder…

India’s crypto investors say tax laws are unfair

2025/10/31 17:37

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

India’s crypto scene is a beautiful mess. On one hand, it’s home to one of the world’s largest communities of crypto users, a young, tech-savvy crowd keen to explore the endless possibilities of decentralized finance.

Summary

  • Crypto adoption meets heavy taxation. India has one of the world’s largest crypto user bases but enforces a harsh 30% tax on gains and 1% TDS on transactions — rules many see as punishing innovation.
  • Lack of clarity drives frustration. With no clear framework or loss offsets, small traders face confusion and compliance burdens, while exchanges lose users to offshore platforms.
  • A balanced approach is overdue. Allowing loss offsets, clearer reporting, and fairer treatment could turn crypto from a suspect activity into a pillar of India’s digital future.

Yet on the other hand, the same country enforces some of the toughest tax rules on crypto anywhere in the world. To many, it feels like innovation is being treated with suspicion rather than support. That frustration shows in the numbers. In a recent survey of 9,000 Indian participants, approximately 84% said they believe India’s crypto tax policies are unfair.

A punishing framework?

They aren’t quiet about it online either. Just browse Reddit, and you’ll see people calling the rules “excessive” and arguing that “there are no other rules or regulations on it, just tax.”

So who’s right? Should the government ease up, or is it right to keep a tight grip on the volatile market? The government’s rationale has been to curb speculation and protect investors. However, the absence of a coherent crypto regulatory framework only adds to the confusion. Compared to crypto tax rules in other jurisdictions, it makes you wonder whether India has gone too far in tightening the reins on the emerging industry and potentially stifling innovation.

Since 2022, India has levied a flat 30% tax on all crypto gains, with no allowance to offset losses, even against capital gains from other cryptocurrencies. On top of that, there is a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every transaction, and many argue that this has led to a system that effectively penalizes participation in crypto.

When you compare these rules to other jurisdictions, it is obvious why some are outraged. 

The United States and the United Kingdom, for example, tax crypto under capital gains regimes that provide clearer reporting standards and allow loss offsets. In the UK, the first £3,000 of gains are exempt, and profits above that are taxed progressively, at 18% for basic-rate taxpayers and 24% for higher-rate taxpayers, which are both well below India’s flat 30% rate.

Even in countries that have tightened regulations, such as Japan or South Korea, there’s recognition that high taxation stifles the industry.

Clarity…or the lack thereof

It has been a huge disappointment for the many small traders in India who entered the market with modest investments and hopes of building a better financial future through crypto. 

Many of the once-vibrant domestic crypto exchanges have also seen volumes plunge in recent years, as users migrate to offshore platforms or simply exit the market altogether. Local critics have argued that crypto is being taxed not as an investment asset, but as a form of gambling. 

However, unlike gambling, the crypto industry has attracted billions in venture capital, pushed forward software innovation, and created more jobs in the nation. The Income Tax Department treats crypto as a capital asset when it comes to taxation, but there’s still no clarity on how holdings should be valued, or whether decentralized tokens are distinct from exchange-listed coins. Income derived from staking, rewards, or mining is typically taxed at an individual’s applicable income tax rate.

Is there room for a more balanced framework?

For ordinary investors, the rules are opaque, the compliance burdens are high, and the penalties are severe, including evasion of TDS. The penalties range from steep fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity. It’s little wonder that crypto sentiment has soured within the nation.

India’s harsh approach to crypto tax risks alienating the young digital entrepreneurs and developers. Instead of nurturing innovation, the policy appears to be designed to deter it. None of this is to say that crypto should be tax-free or unregulated. India does have a legitimate interest in curbing illicit flows and speculation. But fairness in taxation demands proportion and more clarity.

A more balanced framework could include allowing loss offsets within the digital asset class, differentiating long-term holdings from speculative trades, and providing clearer guidance on reporting and valuation. Such changes wouldn’t just make compliance easier, they’d signal that India sees crypto not as a threat, but as a component of its digital future.

The way forward

Global sentiment toward crypto has turned significantly more positive over the past year, with U.S. President Donald Trump helping to push forward crypto-friendly legislation in the Senate and billions flowing into crypto-related ETFs.

Given India’s immense developer talent and appetite for innovation, it could easily be a global leader in this space. But to get there, the government must abandon the suspicion that treats every crypto trade as a roll of the dice. 

The question isn’t whether to tax, it’s how to tax fairly, without smothering an emerging industry before it matures. For now, India’s crypto investors have reason to feel aggrieved, and unless the taxman rethinks his approach, the country risks taxing away not just profits, but potential.

With recent data indicating that around 7% of India’s population, approximately 94 million people, use cryptocurrency, it’s clear that this is a challenge that will stick around unless meaningful changes are made.

Robin Singh

Robin Singh is the founder and CEO of Koinly, a crypto tax platform designed to help crypto investors generate their income and capital gains tax reports. With a finance and accounting background, he worked as a lead engineer at a Fortune 100 company in the UK before launching Koinly.

Source: https://crypto.news/indias-crypto-investors-say-tax-laws-are-unfair/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

Author: Jasper De Maere , OTC Strategist at Wintertermute Compiled by: Tim, PANews The macroeconomic environment remains supportive, with positive events such as interest rate cuts, the end of quantitative tightening, and stock indices nearing high levels occurring one after another. However, the crypto market continues to lag behind as post-Federal Reserve policy meeting liquidity is waning. Global liquidity continues to expand, but funds are not flowing into the crypto market. ETF inflows have stagnated, decentralized AI activity has dried up, and only stablecoins are maintaining growth. Leverage has been cleared, and the market structure appears healthy, but a rebound in ETF or DAT funds would be the key signal for a liquidity recovery and the start of a potential catch-up rally. Macroeconomic Status Quo Last week, the market experienced volatility due to the Federal Reserve's rate cut, the FOMC meeting minutes, and earnings reports from several US technology companies. We saw the expected 25 basis point rate cut, officially concluding quantitative tightening, and the earnings of the "Big Seven" US stocks were generally positive. However, market volatility occurred after Powell downplayed the near certainty of another rate cut in December. The probability of a rate cut, which had been priced in by the market before the meeting (95%), has now fallen to 68%, prompting traders to reassess their strategies and triggering a rapid shift towards risk aversion. This sell-off didn't seem driven by panic, but rather resembled position adjustments. Some investors had over-bet on a rise before the event, creating a classic "sell the news" situation, as the market had already fully priced in the 25 basis point rate cut. The stock market subsequently stabilized quickly, but the cryptocurrency market did not see a synchronized rebound. Since then, BTC and ETH have been trading sideways, hovering around $107,000 and $3,700 respectively as of this writing. Altcoins have also exhibited a volatile pattern, with their excess gains primarily driven by short-term narratives. Compared to other asset classes, cryptocurrencies are the worst-performing asset class. From an index perspective, crypto assets in a broad sense experienced a significant sell-off last week, with the GMCI-30 index falling 12%. Most sectors closed lower. The gaming sector plummeted 21%. Layer 2 network sector plunges 19% The meme coin sector declined by 18%. Mid-cap and small-cap tokens fell by approximately 15%-16%. Only the AI (-3%) and DePIN (-4%) sectors showed relative resilience, mainly due to the strong performance of TAO tokens and AI proxy concept coins in the early part of last week. Overall, this volatility seems more like a money-driven phenomenon, consistent with the tightening liquidity following the Fed's decision, rather than caused by fundamental factors. So why are cryptocurrencies lagging behind while global risk assets are rising? In short: liquidity. But it's not a lack of liquidity, but rather a problem of where it flows. Global liquidity is clearly expanding. Central banks are intervening in relatively strong rather than weak markets, a situation that has only occurred a few times in the past, usually followed by a strong surge in risk appetite. The problem is that this new liquidity is not flowing into the crypto market as it has in the past. Stablecoin supply continues to climb steadily (up 50% year-to-date, adding $100 billion), but Bitcoin ETF inflows have stagnated since the summer, with assets under management hovering around $150 billion. The once-booming crypto treasury DAT has fallen silent, and related concept stocks listed on exchanges like Nasdaq have seen a significant drop in trading volume. Of the three major funding engines driving the market in the first half of this year, only stablecoins are still playing a role. ETF funding has peaked, DAT activity has dried up, and although overall liquidity remains ample, the share flowing into the crypto market has shrunk significantly. In other words, the tap for funds hasn't been turned off; it's just that the funds have flowed elsewhere. The novelty of ETFs has worn off, allocation ratios have become more normalized, and retail investors' funds have flowed elsewhere, turning to chase the trends in stocks, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. Our Viewpoint The stock market performance proves that the market environment remains strong; liquidity has simply not yet been transmitted to the crypto market. Although the market is still digesting the 10/11 liquidation, the overall structure remains robust—leverage has been cleared, volatility is under control, and the macroeconomic environment is supportive. Bitcoin continues to act as a market anchor thanks to stable ETF inflows and tight exchange supply, while Ethereum and some L1 and L2 tokens have begun to show signs of relative strength. While a growing number of voices on crypto social media are attributing the price weakness to the four-year cycle theory, this concept is no longer truly applicable. In mature markets, the miner supply and halving mechanisms that once drove cycles have long since failed; the core factor truly determining price performance is now liquidity. The macroeconomic environment continues to provide strong support—the interest rate cut cycle has begun, quantitative tightening has ended, and the stock market is frequently hitting new highs—but the crypto market has lagged behind, primarily due to the lack of effective liquidity inflows. Compared to the three major drivers of capital inflows last year and in the first half of this year (ETFs, stablecoins, and DeFi yield assets), only stablecoins are currently showing a healthy trend. Close monitoring of ETF inflows and DAT activity will be key indicators, as these are likely to be the earliest signals of liquidity returning to the crypto market.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:50