The post Meet The Billionaire Family Behind A Food Empire Built On Dessert Topping appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bob Rich’s frozen food business was so successful that he bought the first naming rights to an NFL Stadium in 1973. With the Buffalo Bills’ home set to be demolished after this season, his son, Bob Jr. looks back on the cold realities of running a $5.8 billion family business. Whenever someone offers to acquire Rich Products—Buffalo, New York’s $5.8 billion (annual sales) food giant that you’ve probably never heard of—its senior chairman and son of the founder, Bob Rich Jr., has a form letter ready for his assistant to send back. The response gets sent often, according to Rich: “We say, Dear blank, thank you for your interest in our company. Rich Products is not for sale. Yours Truly.” His assistant often asks if he wants to know who she’s sending the letter back to, but he actually doesn’t. “I don’t really care,” the 84-year-old billionaire says, chuckling. “How bad is that?” “Our biggest priority is that we want to remain a privately held company for eternity,” adds his wife, Mindy, 68, who is chairman of Rich’s and its board. Rich’s north star is keeping the business under 100% family control, as he says, “to have the freedom to make decisions quickly and move ahead with more speed.” His father, Bob Sr., invented the first non-dairy whipped topping in 1945—three years before the better-known (and dairy-based) Reddi-Wip came to market—and Rich’s signature whipped topping is now sold in more than 100 countries. It remains one of the top products for an expansive food conglomerate—which Forbes values at north of $7 billion—whose range of products include cookies sold at supermarket bakeries, cold foam offered at coffee shops, pizza dough for independent and chain pizzerias, as well as SeaPak frozen seafood and Carvel ice cream cakes. Its longtime customers include Walmart,… The post Meet The Billionaire Family Behind A Food Empire Built On Dessert Topping appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bob Rich’s frozen food business was so successful that he bought the first naming rights to an NFL Stadium in 1973. With the Buffalo Bills’ home set to be demolished after this season, his son, Bob Jr. looks back on the cold realities of running a $5.8 billion family business. Whenever someone offers to acquire Rich Products—Buffalo, New York’s $5.8 billion (annual sales) food giant that you’ve probably never heard of—its senior chairman and son of the founder, Bob Rich Jr., has a form letter ready for his assistant to send back. The response gets sent often, according to Rich: “We say, Dear blank, thank you for your interest in our company. Rich Products is not for sale. Yours Truly.” His assistant often asks if he wants to know who she’s sending the letter back to, but he actually doesn’t. “I don’t really care,” the 84-year-old billionaire says, chuckling. “How bad is that?” “Our biggest priority is that we want to remain a privately held company for eternity,” adds his wife, Mindy, 68, who is chairman of Rich’s and its board. Rich’s north star is keeping the business under 100% family control, as he says, “to have the freedom to make decisions quickly and move ahead with more speed.” His father, Bob Sr., invented the first non-dairy whipped topping in 1945—three years before the better-known (and dairy-based) Reddi-Wip came to market—and Rich’s signature whipped topping is now sold in more than 100 countries. It remains one of the top products for an expansive food conglomerate—which Forbes values at north of $7 billion—whose range of products include cookies sold at supermarket bakeries, cold foam offered at coffee shops, pizza dough for independent and chain pizzerias, as well as SeaPak frozen seafood and Carvel ice cream cakes. Its longtime customers include Walmart,…

Meet The Billionaire Family Behind A Food Empire Built On Dessert Topping

2025/11/02 19:37

Bob Rich’s frozen food business was so successful that he bought the first naming rights to an NFL Stadium in 1973. With the Buffalo Bills’ home set to be demolished after this season, his son, Bob Jr. looks back on the cold realities of running a $5.8 billion family business.


Whenever someone offers to acquire Rich Products—Buffalo, New York’s $5.8 billion (annual sales) food giant that you’ve probably never heard of—its senior chairman and son of the founder, Bob Rich Jr., has a form letter ready for his assistant to send back.

The response gets sent often, according to Rich: “We say, Dear blank, thank you for your interest in our company. Rich Products is not for sale. Yours Truly.”

His assistant often asks if he wants to know who she’s sending the letter back to, but he actually doesn’t. “I don’t really care,” the 84-year-old billionaire says, chuckling. “How bad is that?”

“Our biggest priority is that we want to remain a privately held company for eternity,” adds his wife, Mindy, 68, who is chairman of Rich’s and its board.

Rich’s north star is keeping the business under 100% family control, as he says, “to have the freedom to make decisions quickly and move ahead with more speed.” His father, Bob Sr., invented the first non-dairy whipped topping in 1945—three years before the better-known (and dairy-based) Reddi-Wip came to market—and Rich’s signature whipped topping is now sold in more than 100 countries. It remains one of the top products for an expansive food conglomerate—which Forbes values at north of $7 billion—whose range of products include cookies sold at supermarket bakeries, cold foam offered at coffee shops, pizza dough for independent and chain pizzerias, as well as SeaPak frozen seafood and Carvel ice cream cakes. Its longtime customers include Walmart, Kroger, and Dunkin’, Publix, Sodexo and more.

“Growth for us is not exponential. It’s not a straight line. It goes step by step,” says Rich, whose fortune Forbes estimates at $6.5 billion, based on his stake in the business and other investments.

The company expects to grow annual revenue to $10 billion by 2030, and the plan to get there includes more “breakthrough” products designed for restaurants and wholesalers that alleviate labor woes as well as reformulating some bestsellers for the MAHA era.

Dreams of Fields: In 1973, Bob Rich Sr. paid $1.5 million for the naming rights to the Buffalo Bills’ stadium, the first such deal in NFL history.

Jeff Goode/Toronto Star/Getty Images

And there’s another massive change ahead for Rich’s: At the end of this NFL season, the Buffalo Bills’ stadium—which became the first to sell naming rights to a business in 1973 when Bob Sr. spent $1.5 million for a 25-year contract, the only one to make a bid—will be demolished. It bore the Rich family name until 1997, when it was renamed for team founder Ralph Wilson until 2015.

“Now there are about 500 stadiums around the world that have sold their naming rights. It was a crazy decision,” Rich says, “that was okay.”

Bob and Mindy, avid Bills fans, say they are excited for the new stadium, just as they are excited about what’s on the horizon for Rich’s as it moves into its next 80 years. “I saw someone walking around last week wearing a shirt that said, ‘We still call it Rich Stadium,’ which I laughed about,” says Bob. “It’ll be a point of pride for everybody, including us.”



The son of a Buffalo dairyman, Robert E. Rich delivered milk for his father during summers in high school and when he graduated in 1935 he started his own dairy business. It soon became one of the largest in the region. Then, during World War II, he served as a milk administrator while dairy was rationed and got inspired when a chance call from a hospital purchasing agent mentioned how they were using soybean-based milks and creams from Henry Ford’s George Washington Carver Laboratory. After a tour of the facility, Rich was granted rights to their manufacturing system for a symbolic $1 fee. And he set out to develop a dessert topping—less fattening and harder to spoil, and, above all, cheaper to make than whipped cream—to the masses.

His frozen blue cans of Rich’s non-dairy whipped topping were a hit—he had $29,900 in sales that first year in 1945 (or about $540,000 today)—and as World War II rations came to an end and post-war grocery spending boomed, so did sales. By 1952, sales topped $1 million (or $12 million today) for the first time. And the business prevailed even after attracting 40 different lawsuits from the dairy industry claiming he was counterfeiting cream. Rich didn’t let any of that stop him, and he quickly brought the treat around the world.

“My father used to joke that his office was the tray of an airplane,” says Bob Jr., who joined the business full-time in 1963 after summers and afterschool hours spent on the family loading docks. Bob Jr. had to be wooed by his father. His interests had been elsewhere, after playing hockey as the backup goalie for Buffalo’s American Hockey League franchise, a failed 1964 Olympics hockey tryout and interviews with the Air Force and the CIA. But Bob Sr. offered his son the chance to build a plant in Canada and oversee a $1 million budget (about $10 million today) as president of the company’s first international division.

Just Desserts: Invented in 1945, Rich’s Whip Topping was less fattening and cheaper to make than whipped cream

Rich Products

The father and son had a competitive relationship at first. But they soon realized they were teammates after the first 5,000 pounds of topping from Bob Jr.’s new Canadian factory wouldn’t whip, and Bob Jr. had to swallow his pride and ask his dad for help.

Rich’s first major acquisition came in 1976, the year that company annual sales topped $100 million for the first time. The business purchased SeaPak frozen seafood for $11.5 million—and it cemented the business’s strategy of useing acquisitions to grow. Bob Jr. became president of Rich’s two years later, and has added 60 brands through acquisitions since. He also bought Buffalo’s struggling Triple A baseball team to make sure the franchise stayed in the city and has owned the Buffalo Bisons, the minor league franchise of the Toronto Blue Jays, since 1983.

Later that year, Bob Jr. met Mindy, 16 years younger, at a Buffalo Bisons baseball game. It turned out that she also grew up in a family-owned food business—one based in Cincinnati— that sold donuts and other products like extruded crunchy onion rings.

The two wed—it was Bob Jr.’s third marriage—and Mindy started working at Rich’s “the day we got back from our honeymoon” in 1985—in the company’s internal entertainment department. (And it wasn’t until years later that she realized that, after her family sold its business amid problems, some of the brands changed hands a few times, and the onion ring brand even ended up being owned by Rich’s.) “Having grown up in the food industry, it didn’t make sense when we got married for me to work anywhere else,” says Mindy. By 1996, annual sales topped $1 billion.

Bob Jr. took over as chairman in 2006, after his father passed away at 92. Bob Sr. had spent 61 years at the helm of the company, and until his death he always had a dog-eared piece of paper in his pocket with the company’s annual sales. Rich’s had made a profit every year it was in business at the time (and that’s still true today). Forbes estimated annual sales in the final year of his life at $2.4 billion.

Bob Jr. inherited a fortune worth at least $1.5 billion. His younger brother, David, who became a priest and had moved to Jackson, Mississippi to work for an Anglican Church, inherited the rest of the family stake, worth hundreds of millions. Their sister, Joanna, whose husband sued his father-in-law twice and lost both times, was cut out of the will.

As Rich’s became a $3 billion (annual sales) company in 2013, the business went on a new acquisition spree, adding patented smoothie machine brand F’Real Foods as well as three wholesale bakery businesses.

With that kind of growth, the Riches had to make a concerted effort to stop talking about work at home, and even vowed that they would never speak of work while spending time on their fishing boat. “I’d say we were successful 80% of the time,” Mindy recalls. Rich has written several novels about fishing, and 2015’s Looking Through Water about an estranged father and son at a fly fishing tournament was turned into a movie with Michael Douglas that was released in September.

Buffalo Billing: Until his death at 92, Bob Rich Sr. always had a paper in his pocket with the company’s annual sales. In 2006, the final year of his life, it was $2.4 billion.

Rich Products

In 2021, when annual sales were $4 billion, Rich decided to replace himself as chairman of the board, which he had run for the past 15 years, and determined Mindy was the perfect person to replace him. “It’s given me the opportunity to step into a new role as a senior chairman and brought new joy watching Mindy bring her personality to the forefront,” Rich says.

“Our approach to being transparent and authentic during the challenging times has helped us build trust,” she adds. “You can’t always paint a rosy picture when the picture is maybe not as rosy as you’d like it to be.”

One thing the Riches agree on is Bob Sr.’s guiding principle—remaining private: “We realized that publicly held companies couldn’t have the stability that we could in a well-run privately held company that has continuity of leadership and direction.”

That unwavering commitment to being family-owned doesn’t mean that the family needs to have Rich’s be family-run in the future. For years, they had a rule in place that any of his four children who want to work at Rich’s must first get a job and a promotion at another company.

The heir apparent would be Ted Rich, 56, Bob’s second-eldest son who started at Rich’s in sales in 1995 at 26 years old, and is now the chief growth officer. But Ted, who is also on Rich’s board and leads the family council, demurs when asked if he’s next in line: “Every day I wake up and just think about the importance of stewardship,” he says. “I’m just happy to be a part of it and offer my leadership where I can, candidly. I will continue to support and offer my leadership in any way possible.”

“I you’re not moving forward, it’s not going to work,” adds Ted. “You can’t stand still in business.”

Rich’s CEO Richard Ferranti, 65, describes Bob and Mindy’s leadership style as “simple but powerful.” Referencing one of their core beliefs that “you can’t do good business with bad people,” he shares a moment that drove this ideal home to him a few years ago. Ferranti had been pursuing a large acquisition that would have reshaped Rich’s portfolio and significantly expanded its customer base. “On paper, it was a game-changer,” he says.

But late in the due-diligence process, they uncovered two serious issues. As Ferranti recalls, “While this company’s explanations and mitigation plans met legal and regulatory requirements, what stood out was their lack of genuine care and concern for the impact on customers and reputation. That gave us a window into the management team’s values, and since we planned to retain most of them, it was a deal-breaker. Walking away from something that big was difficult and easy at the same time.”

Another important aspect of what Rich’s doesn’t compromise on is its location. Rich says the business is often asked to move its headquarters to “wonderful warm climate cities” often with tax incentives or other funding offered. But he doesn’t think twice.

“We are a Buffalo company,” he says. “We’re going to fight for our community. And, as everybody says—last one to leave, turn out the lights. If that happens, it’ll probably be us.”

More from Forbes

ForbesMeet The Mastermind Behind The $1.9 Billion Poppi DealForbesInside The Billion-Dollar Red Sauce War: Carbone Vs. Rao’sForbesMeet The Florida Sugar Barons Worth $4 Billion And Getting Sweet Deals From Donald TrumpForbesFor Hooters’ Original Founders, Saving The Chain Is A Higher Calling: “America Needs Us.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chloesorvino/2025/11/02/meet-the-billionaires-behind-a-food-empire-built-on-dessert-topping/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

Source: VeradiVerdict Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher Summary Crypto as a Service (CaaS) is the "Software as a Service (SaaS) era" in the blockchain space. Banks and fintech companies no longer need to build crypto infrastructure from scratch. They can simply connect to APIs and white-label platforms to launch digital asset functionality within days or weeks, instead of the years that used to take. ( Note: White-labeling essentially involves one party providing a product or technology, while another party brands it for sale or operation. In the finance/crypto field, this refers to banks or exchanges using third-party trading systems, wallets, or payment gateways and then rebranding them.) Mainstream markets are accelerating adoption through three channels. Banks are partnering with custodians like Coinbase, Anchorage, and BitGo while actively exploring tokenized assets; fintech companies are issuing their own stablecoins using platforms like M^0; and payment processors such as Western Union (with $300 billion in annual transactions) and Zelle (with over $1 trillion in annual transactions) are now integrating stablecoins to enable instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. Crypto as a Service (CaaS) isn't actually that complicated. Essentially, it's Software as a Service (SaaS) based on cryptocurrency, making it a hundred times easier for institutions and businesses to integrate into the cryptocurrency space. Banks, fintech companies, and enterprises no longer need to painstakingly build internal cryptocurrency functionality. Instead, they can simply plug and play, deploying within days using proven APIs and white-label platforms. Businesses can focus on their customers without worrying about the complexities of blockchain. They can leverage existing infrastructure to participate in cryptocurrency transactions more efficiently and cost-effectively. In other words, they can easily and seamlessly integrate into the digital asset ecosystem. CaaS is poised for exponential growth. CaaS is a cloud-based business model and infrastructure solution that enables businesses, fintech companies, and developers to integrate cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality into their operations without having to build or maintain the underlying technology from scratch. CaaS provides ready-to-use, scalable services, typically delivered via APIs or white-label platforms, such as crypto wallets, trading engines, payment gateways, asset storage, custody, and compliance tools. This allows businesses to quickly offer digital asset functionality under their own brand, reducing development costs, time, and required technical expertise. Like other "as-a-service" offerings, this model allows businesses of all sizes, from startups to established companies, to participate in a cost-effective manner. In September 2025, Coinbase Institutional listed CaaS as one of its biggest growth areas. Since 2013, Pantera Capital has been committed to driving the development of CaaS through investment. We strategically invest in infrastructure, tools, and technology to ensure that CaaS can operate at scale. By accelerating the development of backend fund management, custody, and wallets, we have significantly enhanced the service tier of CaaS. Advantages of CaaS By using CaaS to transparently integrate encryption capabilities into their systems, enterprises can achieve numerous strategic and operational advantages more quickly and cost-effectively. These advantages include: One-stop integration and seamless embedding : The CaaS platform eliminates the need for custom development cycles, enabling teams to activate features in days rather than months. Flexible profit models : Businesses can choose a subscription-based fixed-price model for predictable costs, or a pay-as-you-go billing model to keep expenses in line with revenue. Either approach avoids large upfront capital investments. Outsourcing blockchain complexity : Enterprises can offload technical management while benefiting from a powerful enterprise-grade backend, ensuring near-perfect uptime, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover. Developer-friendly APIs and SDKs : Developers can embed wallet creation and key management functions, smoothly handle on-chain settlements, trigger smart contract interactions, and create a comprehensive sandbox environment. White-label branding and an intuitive interface : The CaaS solution is easy to customize, enabling non-technical teams to configure free infrastructure, supported assets, and user onboarding processes. Other value-added features : Leading providers bundle ancillary services together, such as fraud detection based on on-chain analytics; automated tax filing; multi-signature fund management; and cross-chain bridging for asset interoperability. These characteristics transform cryptocurrency from a technological novelty into a revenue-generating product line while maintaining a focus on core business capabilities. Three core use cases We believe the world is rapidly evolving towards a cryptocurrency-native environment, with individuals and businesses interacting more frequently with digital assets. This shift is driven by increasing user acceptance of blockchain wallets, decentralized applications, and on-chain transactions, which in turn benefits from continuously improving user interfaces, abundant educational resources, and practical application value. However, for cryptocurrencies to truly integrate into the mainstream and achieve widespread adoption, a strong and seamless bridge must be built to bridge the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Institutions seek the advantages of cryptocurrencies (speed, programmability, and global accessibility) while relying on trustworthy intermediaries to manage their underlying complexities: tools, security, technology stack, and liquidity provision. Ultimately, this ecosystem integration could gradually bring billions of users onto the blockchain. Use Case 1: Bank Banks are increasingly partnering with regulated cryptocurrency custodians such as Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo to provide institutional-grade custody, insured storage, and seamless spot trading services for digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These foundational services—custody, execution, and basic lending—represent the most readily achievable aspects of cryptocurrency integration, enabling banks to easily embrace customers without forcing them out of the traditional banking system. Beyond these fundamental elements, banks can leverage decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols to generate competitive returns from idle treasury assets or customer deposits. For example, they can deploy stablecoins into permissionless lending markets (such as Morpho, Aave, or Compound) or liquidity pools of automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap to obtain real-time, transparent returns that typically outperform traditional fixed-income products. The tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs) presents transformative opportunities. Banks can initiate and distribute on-chain versions of traditional securities (e.g., tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, private credit, or even real estate funds issued through BlackRock's BUIDL fund), bringing off-chain value to public blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, or Base. These RWAs can then be traded peer-to-peer through DeFi protocols such as Morpho (for optimizing lending), Pendle (for yield sharing), or Centrifuge (for private credit pools), while ensuring KYC/AML compliance through whitelisted wallets or institutional vaults. RWAs can also serve as high-quality collateral in the DeFi lending market. Crucially, banks can offer seamless stablecoin access without losing customers. Through embedded wallets or custodial sub-accounts, customers can hold USDC, USDT, or FDIC-insured digital dollars directly within the bank's app (for payments, remittances, or yield-generating investments) without leaving the bank's ecosystem. This "walled garden" model resembles a new bank but with regulated trust. Looking ahead, major banks may form alliances to issue branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by centralized reserves. These stablecoins could be settled instantly on public blockchains while complying with regulatory requirements, thus connecting traditional finance with programmable money. If a bank views blockchain as infrastructure, rather than an accessory tool, it is likely to capture the next trillion dollars in value. Use Case 2: Fintech Companies and New Types of Banks Fintech companies and new-age banks are rapidly integrating cryptocurrencies into their core offerings through strategic partnerships with established platforms such as Robinhood, Revolut, and Webull. These collaborations enable seamless use and secure custody of digital assets, while providing instant trading of tokenized versions of traditional stocks, effectively bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. Beyond partnerships, fintech companies can leverage professional service providers like Alchemy to build and launch their own blockchain infrastructure. Alchemy, a leader in blockchain development platforms, offers scalable node infrastructure, enhanced APIs, and developer tools that simplify the creation of custom Layer-1 or Layer-2 networks. This allows fintech companies to tailor blockchains for specific use cases, such as high-throughput payments, decentralized authentication, or RWA (Risk Weighted Authorization), while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements and optimizing for low latency and cost-effectiveness. Fintech companies can further deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency space by issuing their own stablecoins and leveraging decentralized protocols on platforms like M^0 to mint yielding, fungible stablecoins backed by high-quality collateral such as US Treasury bonds. By adopting this model, fintech companies can mint their own tokens on demand, maintain full control over the underlying economic mechanisms (including interest accumulation and redemption mechanisms), ensure regulatory compliance through transparent on-chain reserves, and participate in co-governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Furthermore, they can benefit from enhanced liquidity pools on major exchanges and DeFi protocols, reducing fragmentation and increasing user adoption. This approach not only creates new revenue streams but also positions fintech companies as innovators in the field of programmable money and fosters customer loyalty in the competitive digital economy. Use Case 3: Payment Processor Payment companies are building stablecoin "sandwiches": a multi-tiered cross-border settlement system that receives fiat currency at one end and exports instant, low-cost liquidity in another jurisdiction, while minimizing foreign exchange spreads, intermediary fees, and settlement delays. The components of the "sandwich" include: Top Slice (Entry Point) : US customers send US dollars to payment providers such as Stripe, Circle, Ripple, or newer banks like Mercury. Filling (minting) : US dollars are immediately exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for regulated stablecoins—usually USDC (Circle), USDP (Paxos), or bank-issued digital dollars. Bottom Slice (Export) : Stablecoins are bridged or exchanged for local currency stablecoins—for example, aARS (pegged to the Argentine peso), BRLA (Brazil), or MXNA (Mexico)—or become central bank digital currency pilot projects directly (for example, Drex in Brazil). Settlement : Funds arrive in local bank accounts, mobile wallets or merchant payments on a T+0 (instant) basis, with total costs typically below 0.1%, compared to 3-7% through SWIFT + agent banks. Western Union, a 175-year-old remittance giant that processes over $300 billion in remittances annually, recently announced the integration of stablecoins into its ecosystem. Pantera Capital CEO Devin McGranahan stated in July 2025 that the company had historically been "cautious" about cryptocurrencies, concerned about their volatility and regulatory issues. However, the enactment of the Genius Act has changed this. “As the rules become clearer, we see a real opportunity to integrate digital assets into our business,” McGranahan said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. The result: Western Union is currently actively testing stablecoin solutions for Treasury settlements and customer payments, leveraging blockchain technology to eliminate the cumbersome processes of correspondent banking. Zelle, a bank-backed peer-to-peer payment giant (part of Early Warning Services, a consortium of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and others), facilitates over $1 trillion in fee-free transfers annually within the United States via simple phone numbers or email addresses, currently boasting over 2,300 partner institutions and 150 million users. However, cross-border payments have been a previous challenge. On October 24, 2025, Early Warning announced a stablecoin plan aimed at bringing Zelle to the international market, offering "the same speed and reliability" overseas. As banks, fintech/new banks, and payment processors integrate cryptocurrencies in an intuitive, plug-and-play, and compliant manner (with as few regulators as possible), they can continue to expand their global reach and strengthen relationships. in conclusion CaaS is not hype—it represents a revolution in infrastructure that makes cryptocurrencies invisible to end users. Just as people don't think of AWS when watching Netflix or Salesforce when checking a CRM, consumers and businesses won't think of blockchain when making instant cross-border payments or accessing tokenized assets. The winners of this revolution are not companies that add cryptocurrencies as an afterthought to traditional systems, but rather institutions and enterprises that see blockchain as infrastructure, and the investors who support the underlying technology that underpins it all.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:00
Bitcoin Price Crashes Below $99,000: Experts Breaks Down Why

Bitcoin Price Crashes Below $99,000: Experts Breaks Down Why

Bitcoin endured one of its sharpest selloffs of the year on Tuesday, knifing below the six-figure threshold and printing lows around the $99,000 area on major composites before rebounding. At press time, bitcoin (BTC) hovered near $101,700 after an intraday trough just above $99,000 on widely used benchmarks, marking a fall of roughly 6% day-over-day and the lowest print since June. The slide came as US equities limped into mid-week, with the Nasdaq up 20.9% year-to-date and the S&P 500 up 15.1% as of Tuesday’s close—gains that underscore how much bitcoin has lagged other risk assets during long stretches of 2025. That divergence, together with a growing body of ETF-flow data showing several straight sessions of net outflows from US spot bitcoin funds into early November, provided the macro backdrop for a fragile crypto tape. Independent tallies from Farside/SoSoValue and multiple outlets point to a roughly $1.3–$1.4 billion cumulative bleed over four trading days into November 3–4, led by BlackRock’s IBIT. Why Is Bitcoin Price Down? Into that context, Joe Consorti—Head of Growth at Horizon (Theya, YC)—argues the selloff is less a loss of conviction than a structural handoff of supply. In a video analysis posted late November 4 US time, he framed the day’s move as “one of its roughest days of the year, down more than 6 percent, falling to $99,000 for the first time since June,” adding that while equities would call that “the start of a bear market… for Bitcoin, though, this is typical of a bull market drawdown.” He noted that “we’ve already weathered two separate 30 percent drawdowns during this bull run,” and characterized the present action as “a transfer of Bitcoin’s ownership base from the old guard to the new guard.” Related Reading: CryptoQuant Head Reveals Reason Behind Bearish Bitcoin Trend Consorti anchored his thesis to a now-viral framework from macro investor Jordi Visser: bitcoin’s “silent IPO.” In Visser’s Substack essay—shared widely since the weekend—he posits that 2025’s rangebound price belies an orderly, IPO-like distribution as early-era holders access the deepest liquidity the asset has ever had through ETFs, institutional custodians and corporate balance sheets. “Early-stage investors… need liquidity. They need an exit. They need to diversify,” Visser wrote, arguing that methodical selling “results [in] a sideways grind that drives everyone crazy.” Consorti adopted the frame bluntly: “This isn’t panic selling, it’s the natural evolution of an asset that’s reached maturity… a transfer of ownership from concentrated hands to distributed ones.” Evidence for that churn has been visible on-chain. Multiple instances of Satoshi-era wallets and miner addresses reanimating this quarter—some after 14 years—have been documented, including July’s duo of 10,000-BTC wallets and late-October movement from a 4,000-BTC miner address. While not dispositive that coins are being market-sold, the pattern is consistent with supply redistributing from early concentrates to broader, regulated channels. Technically, Consorti cast the drop as part of “digestion,” not exhaustion. “The RSI tells us Bitcoin is at its most oversold level since April, when the last leg of the bull run began. Every drawdown this cycle, 30%, 35%, and now 20%, has built support rather than destroyed it.” He added a key conditional: “If we spend too much time below $100,000, that could suggest the distribution isn’t done… perhaps we’re in for a bull-market reversal into a bear market.” Macro, however, is intruding. The Federal Reserve cut rates by 25 bps on October 29 to a 3.75%–4.00% target range, but Chair Jerome Powell carefully pushed back on the idea of an automatic December cut, citing “strongly differing views” inside the FOMC and a “data fog” from the ongoing government shutdown. Markets promptly tempered their odds for further near-term easing. Consorti’s warning that bitcoin “is extremely correlated” to risk-asset drawdowns therefore looms large: if equities lurch meaningfully lower or funding stress reappears, crypto will feel it. Related Reading: Bitcoin Bull Run: Over Or Just Paused? CryptoQuant CEO Presents The Data If Visser’s “silent IPO” is right, ETFs are both symptom and salve. They have delivered the two-sided depth to absorb legacy supply but also introduced a new, faster-moving cohort whose redemptions can amplify downdrafts. That dynamic showed up again this week in the four-day string of net outflows concentrated in IBIT, even as longer-term assets under management remain enormous by historical standards. Consorti’s conclusion was starkly patient, not euphoric. “For every seller looking to liquidate their position, there’s a new participant stepping in for the long haul… It’s slow, it’s uneven, and it’s psychologically draining, but once it’s finished, it unlocks the next leg higher. Because the marginal seller is gone, and what’s left is a base of holders who don’t need to sell.” Whether Tuesday’s pierce of the six-figure floor proves the climactic flush—or merely another chapter in a months-long ownership transfer—will hinge on how quickly price reclaims and bases above $100,000, how ETF flows stabilize, and whether the Fed’s path from here restores risk appetite or starves it. For now, the most important story in bitcoin may be happening under the surface, not on the chart. At press time, BTC traded at $101,865. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/11/05 16:00