The post ‘Only Murders In The Building’ Season 5 Reveals Killer In Shockingly Bad Finale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Only Murders In The Building Credit: Hulu The mystery has been solved and the killer brought to justice in Season 5 of Only Murders In The Building. This was a bad season with a lame mystery and the revelations in its finale were neither surprising nor satisfying. This has been far and away the worst season of Hulu’s cozy mystery, and it’s a real shame. I still love these characters, but the writing has fallen off a cliff. There’s a great deal wrong with the entire season and it all comes to a head in Episode 10, as our heroes – Charles-Haden Savage (Steve Martin), Oliver Putnam (Martin Short) and Mabel Mora (Selena Gomez) stumble on Lester’s killer in one of the most hamfisted ways possible. Gone are the clever clues, the more intricate sleuthing, the sly misdirects. This season even traded the show’s main gimmick – the podcast itself – for yet more focus on celebrity guest stars. What a mess. Spoilers ahead. Only Murders In The Building Season 5 Killer Revealed Only Murders In The Building Credit: Hulu All season long, there have been three primary questions facing our trio of amateur detectives as well as audiences: Who killed Lester (Teddy Coluca)? Who killed Nicky (Bobby Cannavale)? Who does this finger belong to? There are a few secondary questions as well, including: Why are the cops apparently not investigating any of this at all? Why do the billionaires want the Arconia for their casino? (Not only would it violate zoning laws, it’s now the site of a recent double-homicide and requires buying out a bunch of residents who almost certainly would not go as easily as this show makes it seem). What was the point of the robot other than to give us a crucial clue at the… The post ‘Only Murders In The Building’ Season 5 Reveals Killer In Shockingly Bad Finale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Only Murders In The Building Credit: Hulu The mystery has been solved and the killer brought to justice in Season 5 of Only Murders In The Building. This was a bad season with a lame mystery and the revelations in its finale were neither surprising nor satisfying. This has been far and away the worst season of Hulu’s cozy mystery, and it’s a real shame. I still love these characters, but the writing has fallen off a cliff. There’s a great deal wrong with the entire season and it all comes to a head in Episode 10, as our heroes – Charles-Haden Savage (Steve Martin), Oliver Putnam (Martin Short) and Mabel Mora (Selena Gomez) stumble on Lester’s killer in one of the most hamfisted ways possible. Gone are the clever clues, the more intricate sleuthing, the sly misdirects. This season even traded the show’s main gimmick – the podcast itself – for yet more focus on celebrity guest stars. What a mess. Spoilers ahead. Only Murders In The Building Season 5 Killer Revealed Only Murders In The Building Credit: Hulu All season long, there have been three primary questions facing our trio of amateur detectives as well as audiences: Who killed Lester (Teddy Coluca)? Who killed Nicky (Bobby Cannavale)? Who does this finger belong to? There are a few secondary questions as well, including: Why are the cops apparently not investigating any of this at all? Why do the billionaires want the Arconia for their casino? (Not only would it violate zoning laws, it’s now the site of a recent double-homicide and requires buying out a bunch of residents who almost certainly would not go as easily as this show makes it seem). What was the point of the robot other than to give us a crucial clue at the…

‘Only Murders In The Building’ Season 5 Reveals Killer In Shockingly Bad Finale

2025/10/29 07:54

Only Murders In The Building

Credit: Hulu

The mystery has been solved and the killer brought to justice in Season 5 of Only Murders In The Building. This was a bad season with a lame mystery and the revelations in its finale were neither surprising nor satisfying. This has been far and away the worst season of Hulu’s cozy mystery, and it’s a real shame. I still love these characters, but the writing has fallen off a cliff.

There’s a great deal wrong with the entire season and it all comes to a head in Episode 10, as our heroes – Charles-Haden Savage (Steve Martin), Oliver Putnam (Martin Short) and Mabel Mora (Selena Gomez) stumble on Lester’s killer in one of the most hamfisted ways possible. Gone are the clever clues, the more intricate sleuthing, the sly misdirects. This season even traded the show’s main gimmick – the podcast itself – for yet more focus on celebrity guest stars. What a mess.

Spoilers ahead.

Only Murders In The Building Season 5 Killer Revealed

Only Murders In The Building

Credit: Hulu

All season long, there have been three primary questions facing our trio of amateur detectives as well as audiences:

  • Who killed Lester (Teddy Coluca)?
  • Who killed Nicky (Bobby Cannavale)?
  • Who does this finger belong to?

There are a few secondary questions as well, including:

  • Why are the cops apparently not investigating any of this at all?
  • Why do the billionaires want the Arconia for their casino? (Not only would it violate zoning laws, it’s now the site of a recent double-homicide and requires buying out a bunch of residents who almost certainly would not go as easily as this show makes it seem).
  • What was the point of the robot other than to give us a crucial clue at the right time instead of making the trio work for it?

The first three questions are answered in the Only Murders In The Building finale. Upset over his wife’s affair, Nicky chops off Mayor Beau Tillman’s (Keegan-Michael Key) finger in the casino below the Arconia. The ensuing argument is brought to a halt when Lester attacks Nicky with the elevator crank. Nicky and Lester struggle, falling to the floor where the meat cleaver Nicky used to lop of Tillman’s finger accidentally kills him (Lester wasn’t a murderer, after all).

Here’s where things get very strange. Tillman wants the finger back, which is understandable, but apparently he wants it back because people will realize he’s corrupt if he’s missing a finger. Why? I don’t follow the show’s logic here at all. Tillman is an expert liar. Surely he could A) hide it with a prosthetic like he ends up doing or B) make up a lie that would garner sympathy from voters. Instead, he chases Lester, who we know has sent the finger with the shrimp up to Oliver. Lester tries to escape the mayor and tries texting “It’s Beau Tillman” but autocorrect changes this to “It’s beautiful.”

They struggle at the fountain and Tillman kills Lester, though it’s clear he didn’t actually mean to kill him. Lester uses his dying breath to blow his bird whistle and activate the one camera that Bash Steed (Christoph Waltz) doesn’t control.

The texts are what finally clue Mabel in to the murderer’s identity. Howard (Michael Cyril Creighton) texts her that Beaut Tillman is headed down to the casino and it autocorrects to “beautiful.”

This was all a fan theory weeks ago and I’m honestly shocked it ended up being the decisive clue. It’s perhaps the silliest clue this show has used so far and this, and the entire murder investigation, are a massive step down from previous seasons, which actually involved some detective work rather than a series of lucky breaks and happy (and not so happy) accidents. If Lester simply hadn’t messed up the text, there wouldn’t have been a plot at all.

Other Problems With The Only Murders In The Building Season 5 Finale

Only Murders In the Building

Credit: Hulu

There are plenty of other problems with this entire season and the season finale, though the uninteresting mystery and the boring way it was solved are the biggest. Still, others include:

  • The celebrity guest stars were totally wasted. This is a problem of quantity over quality. There was no need to have a trio of billionaires at all. You have Christoph Waltz in your cast. Have him be the sole billionaire and give him more screen-time. Flesh out his character, make him a real suspect, have him behind all the shenanigans. I don’t mind Key as Mayor Tillman, though I think it would have probably been better to have an even less-known character actor in the role since it was pretty obvious that he was at least involved in the murders. This show has leaned too heavily on celebrities in recent seasons, and it needs to get back to its roots (though this seems ever more unlikely as apparently we’re off to London for Season 6). When they were all cuffed and taken out of the casino, it just felt very humdrum, no big deal. A little joke about Bash’s immortality but mostly very flat.
  • Teddy’s return was also wasted. Nathan Lane was one of the best things about Season 1 and it was so fun to have him return this season. But he just didn’t do much of anything. You could pretty much cut his character entirely and it wouldn’t matter. He’s just one of the boys now rather than an antagonistic figure. If you’re going to bring Lane/Teddy back to the show, give him something to do.
  • Althea’s (Beanie Feldstein) plan to get past the cops was weird. They just transport the entire crowd down into the casino basement offscreen? And the cops just . . . stop guarding the place because of that?
  • How does getting Camilla (Renee Zellweger) arrested actually save the Arconia? She hasn’t been convicted of anything. The plans don’t just miraculously come to a halt because of any of this. They would need a court injunction of some kind. I disliked the entire “save the Arconia” subplot to begin with, of course, so whatever.
  • Sofia (Tea Leoni) gets a brief coda at the end. She’s in Italy and tells her dying mother off over the phone. It’s very odd and unnecessary.

Of course, there are other issues that have me worried about Season 6.

Only Murders Outside The Building

Only Murders In The Building

Credit: Hulu

A bigger problem is the show moving farther and farther away from the building these murders are only supposed to take place in. The new victim is Cinda Canning (Tina Fey) the podcaster who brought our heroes together in the first place. You might call this coming full circle, and it is kind of poetic. But not only did she die outside the building, even further outside than Lester, it appears Charles, Oliver and Mabel are off to London next season to investigate. That could be fun, but it reminds me of heading to LA. The charm of this show is the intimacy of the building and its residents. That’s the whole point.

I’m also worried that even as more and more superfluous characters are added to the show, Only Murders In The Building is losing the side characters at the heart of the story. We lost Sazz (Jane Lynch) at the end of Season 3, though she showed up as an imaginary friend for Charles at least in Season 4. We’ve lost Lester now as well. I do think that in order to keep murders in the building, you have to have some residents and beloved characters be the victims, but this show is killing off some of the best characters while also drifting outside the Arconia and relegating the actual podcast to the background. It’s a recipe for disaster, or at least for another incredibly generic season.

That’s what Season 5 was like: generic, going through the motions. All the humor felt off, like a weird facsimile of the humor in previous seasons. A weak mystery with lame clues that culminated in an unsurprising and uninspired ending all make this the worst season of the show by a long mile. I really hope they can tighten things up in Season 6, but at this point I’m afraid the writers have simply run out of good ideas.

Because if you think having Charles shimmy up a fire-pole to get a clothes hanger to pick a lock is a good idea, you’ve run out of good ideas. Why not give the rescue to Howard? Or have Jay (Logan Lerman) make his moral turn earlier, and have him and Howard team up to rescue the trio? Jay’s ultimate “good guy” moment would have never happened had they never escaped. One moment he was willing to let all three of them die, the next he had a change of heart. Mabel should have slapped him across the face.

I did like Charles’s line to Sofia: “For once in my life I’m going to say ‘no’ to a dangerous woman.” Good man, Charles. But for the most part, this finale left me cold. We knew the Arconia wasn’t being destroyed; the question is, will it even matter?

What did you think of Season 5 of Only Murders In The Building? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2025/10/28/only-murders-in-the-building-season-5-reveals-killer-in-shockingly-bad-finale/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

Source: VeradiVerdict Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher Summary Crypto as a Service (CaaS) is the "Software as a Service (SaaS) era" in the blockchain space. Banks and fintech companies no longer need to build crypto infrastructure from scratch. They can simply connect to APIs and white-label platforms to launch digital asset functionality within days or weeks, instead of the years that used to take. ( Note: White-labeling essentially involves one party providing a product or technology, while another party brands it for sale or operation. In the finance/crypto field, this refers to banks or exchanges using third-party trading systems, wallets, or payment gateways and then rebranding them.) Mainstream markets are accelerating adoption through three channels. Banks are partnering with custodians like Coinbase, Anchorage, and BitGo while actively exploring tokenized assets; fintech companies are issuing their own stablecoins using platforms like M^0; and payment processors such as Western Union (with $300 billion in annual transactions) and Zelle (with over $1 trillion in annual transactions) are now integrating stablecoins to enable instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. Crypto as a Service (CaaS) isn't actually that complicated. Essentially, it's Software as a Service (SaaS) based on cryptocurrency, making it a hundred times easier for institutions and businesses to integrate into the cryptocurrency space. Banks, fintech companies, and enterprises no longer need to painstakingly build internal cryptocurrency functionality. Instead, they can simply plug and play, deploying within days using proven APIs and white-label platforms. Businesses can focus on their customers without worrying about the complexities of blockchain. They can leverage existing infrastructure to participate in cryptocurrency transactions more efficiently and cost-effectively. In other words, they can easily and seamlessly integrate into the digital asset ecosystem. CaaS is poised for exponential growth. CaaS is a cloud-based business model and infrastructure solution that enables businesses, fintech companies, and developers to integrate cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality into their operations without having to build or maintain the underlying technology from scratch. CaaS provides ready-to-use, scalable services, typically delivered via APIs or white-label platforms, such as crypto wallets, trading engines, payment gateways, asset storage, custody, and compliance tools. This allows businesses to quickly offer digital asset functionality under their own brand, reducing development costs, time, and required technical expertise. Like other "as-a-service" offerings, this model allows businesses of all sizes, from startups to established companies, to participate in a cost-effective manner. In September 2025, Coinbase Institutional listed CaaS as one of its biggest growth areas. Since 2013, Pantera Capital has been committed to driving the development of CaaS through investment. We strategically invest in infrastructure, tools, and technology to ensure that CaaS can operate at scale. By accelerating the development of backend fund management, custody, and wallets, we have significantly enhanced the service tier of CaaS. Advantages of CaaS By using CaaS to transparently integrate encryption capabilities into their systems, enterprises can achieve numerous strategic and operational advantages more quickly and cost-effectively. These advantages include: One-stop integration and seamless embedding : The CaaS platform eliminates the need for custom development cycles, enabling teams to activate features in days rather than months. Flexible profit models : Businesses can choose a subscription-based fixed-price model for predictable costs, or a pay-as-you-go billing model to keep expenses in line with revenue. Either approach avoids large upfront capital investments. Outsourcing blockchain complexity : Enterprises can offload technical management while benefiting from a powerful enterprise-grade backend, ensuring near-perfect uptime, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover. Developer-friendly APIs and SDKs : Developers can embed wallet creation and key management functions, smoothly handle on-chain settlements, trigger smart contract interactions, and create a comprehensive sandbox environment. White-label branding and an intuitive interface : The CaaS solution is easy to customize, enabling non-technical teams to configure free infrastructure, supported assets, and user onboarding processes. Other value-added features : Leading providers bundle ancillary services together, such as fraud detection based on on-chain analytics; automated tax filing; multi-signature fund management; and cross-chain bridging for asset interoperability. These characteristics transform cryptocurrency from a technological novelty into a revenue-generating product line while maintaining a focus on core business capabilities. Three core use cases We believe the world is rapidly evolving towards a cryptocurrency-native environment, with individuals and businesses interacting more frequently with digital assets. This shift is driven by increasing user acceptance of blockchain wallets, decentralized applications, and on-chain transactions, which in turn benefits from continuously improving user interfaces, abundant educational resources, and practical application value. However, for cryptocurrencies to truly integrate into the mainstream and achieve widespread adoption, a strong and seamless bridge must be built to bridge the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Institutions seek the advantages of cryptocurrencies (speed, programmability, and global accessibility) while relying on trustworthy intermediaries to manage their underlying complexities: tools, security, technology stack, and liquidity provision. Ultimately, this ecosystem integration could gradually bring billions of users onto the blockchain. Use Case 1: Bank Banks are increasingly partnering with regulated cryptocurrency custodians such as Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo to provide institutional-grade custody, insured storage, and seamless spot trading services for digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These foundational services—custody, execution, and basic lending—represent the most readily achievable aspects of cryptocurrency integration, enabling banks to easily embrace customers without forcing them out of the traditional banking system. Beyond these fundamental elements, banks can leverage decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols to generate competitive returns from idle treasury assets or customer deposits. For example, they can deploy stablecoins into permissionless lending markets (such as Morpho, Aave, or Compound) or liquidity pools of automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap to obtain real-time, transparent returns that typically outperform traditional fixed-income products. The tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs) presents transformative opportunities. Banks can initiate and distribute on-chain versions of traditional securities (e.g., tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, private credit, or even real estate funds issued through BlackRock's BUIDL fund), bringing off-chain value to public blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, or Base. These RWAs can then be traded peer-to-peer through DeFi protocols such as Morpho (for optimizing lending), Pendle (for yield sharing), or Centrifuge (for private credit pools), while ensuring KYC/AML compliance through whitelisted wallets or institutional vaults. RWAs can also serve as high-quality collateral in the DeFi lending market. Crucially, banks can offer seamless stablecoin access without losing customers. Through embedded wallets or custodial sub-accounts, customers can hold USDC, USDT, or FDIC-insured digital dollars directly within the bank's app (for payments, remittances, or yield-generating investments) without leaving the bank's ecosystem. This "walled garden" model resembles a new bank but with regulated trust. Looking ahead, major banks may form alliances to issue branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by centralized reserves. These stablecoins could be settled instantly on public blockchains while complying with regulatory requirements, thus connecting traditional finance with programmable money. If a bank views blockchain as infrastructure, rather than an accessory tool, it is likely to capture the next trillion dollars in value. Use Case 2: Fintech Companies and New Types of Banks Fintech companies and new-age banks are rapidly integrating cryptocurrencies into their core offerings through strategic partnerships with established platforms such as Robinhood, Revolut, and Webull. These collaborations enable seamless use and secure custody of digital assets, while providing instant trading of tokenized versions of traditional stocks, effectively bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. Beyond partnerships, fintech companies can leverage professional service providers like Alchemy to build and launch their own blockchain infrastructure. Alchemy, a leader in blockchain development platforms, offers scalable node infrastructure, enhanced APIs, and developer tools that simplify the creation of custom Layer-1 or Layer-2 networks. This allows fintech companies to tailor blockchains for specific use cases, such as high-throughput payments, decentralized authentication, or RWA (Risk Weighted Authorization), while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements and optimizing for low latency and cost-effectiveness. Fintech companies can further deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency space by issuing their own stablecoins and leveraging decentralized protocols on platforms like M^0 to mint yielding, fungible stablecoins backed by high-quality collateral such as US Treasury bonds. By adopting this model, fintech companies can mint their own tokens on demand, maintain full control over the underlying economic mechanisms (including interest accumulation and redemption mechanisms), ensure regulatory compliance through transparent on-chain reserves, and participate in co-governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Furthermore, they can benefit from enhanced liquidity pools on major exchanges and DeFi protocols, reducing fragmentation and increasing user adoption. This approach not only creates new revenue streams but also positions fintech companies as innovators in the field of programmable money and fosters customer loyalty in the competitive digital economy. Use Case 3: Payment Processor Payment companies are building stablecoin "sandwiches": a multi-tiered cross-border settlement system that receives fiat currency at one end and exports instant, low-cost liquidity in another jurisdiction, while minimizing foreign exchange spreads, intermediary fees, and settlement delays. The components of the "sandwich" include: Top Slice (Entry Point) : US customers send US dollars to payment providers such as Stripe, Circle, Ripple, or newer banks like Mercury. Filling (minting) : US dollars are immediately exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for regulated stablecoins—usually USDC (Circle), USDP (Paxos), or bank-issued digital dollars. Bottom Slice (Export) : Stablecoins are bridged or exchanged for local currency stablecoins—for example, aARS (pegged to the Argentine peso), BRLA (Brazil), or MXNA (Mexico)—or become central bank digital currency pilot projects directly (for example, Drex in Brazil). Settlement : Funds arrive in local bank accounts, mobile wallets or merchant payments on a T+0 (instant) basis, with total costs typically below 0.1%, compared to 3-7% through SWIFT + agent banks. Western Union, a 175-year-old remittance giant that processes over $300 billion in remittances annually, recently announced the integration of stablecoins into its ecosystem. Pantera Capital CEO Devin McGranahan stated in July 2025 that the company had historically been "cautious" about cryptocurrencies, concerned about their volatility and regulatory issues. However, the enactment of the Genius Act has changed this. “As the rules become clearer, we see a real opportunity to integrate digital assets into our business,” McGranahan said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. The result: Western Union is currently actively testing stablecoin solutions for Treasury settlements and customer payments, leveraging blockchain technology to eliminate the cumbersome processes of correspondent banking. Zelle, a bank-backed peer-to-peer payment giant (part of Early Warning Services, a consortium of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and others), facilitates over $1 trillion in fee-free transfers annually within the United States via simple phone numbers or email addresses, currently boasting over 2,300 partner institutions and 150 million users. However, cross-border payments have been a previous challenge. On October 24, 2025, Early Warning announced a stablecoin plan aimed at bringing Zelle to the international market, offering "the same speed and reliability" overseas. As banks, fintech/new banks, and payment processors integrate cryptocurrencies in an intuitive, plug-and-play, and compliant manner (with as few regulators as possible), they can continue to expand their global reach and strengthen relationships. in conclusion CaaS is not hype—it represents a revolution in infrastructure that makes cryptocurrencies invisible to end users. Just as people don't think of AWS when watching Netflix or Salesforce when checking a CRM, consumers and businesses won't think of blockchain when making instant cross-border payments or accessing tokenized assets. The winners of this revolution are not companies that add cryptocurrencies as an afterthought to traditional systems, but rather institutions and enterprises that see blockchain as infrastructure, and the investors who support the underlying technology that underpins it all.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:00
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39