TLDRs; Australia expands its under-16 social media ban to include Reddit and Kick starting December 10. Non-compliant companies face penalties of up to AU$49.5 million (US$32 million). Platforms must verify user age using biometrics, ID, or context-based tools despite high error rates. Privacy rules restrict data collection, complicating compliance ahead of 2025 enforcement. Australia has [...] The post Reddit, Kick Added to Australia’s Growing Teen Social Media Blacklist appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; Australia expands its under-16 social media ban to include Reddit and Kick starting December 10. Non-compliant companies face penalties of up to AU$49.5 million (US$32 million). Platforms must verify user age using biometrics, ID, or context-based tools despite high error rates. Privacy rules restrict data collection, complicating compliance ahead of 2025 enforcement. Australia has [...] The post Reddit, Kick Added to Australia’s Growing Teen Social Media Blacklist appeared first on CoinCentral.

Reddit, Kick Added to Australia’s Growing Teen Social Media Blacklist

2025/11/06 04:44

TLDRs;

  • Australia expands its under-16 social media ban to include Reddit and Kick starting December 10.
  • Non-compliant companies face penalties of up to AU$49.5 million (US$32 million).
  • Platforms must verify user age using biometrics, ID, or context-based tools despite high error rates.
  • Privacy rules restrict data collection, complicating compliance ahead of 2025 enforcement.

Australia has officially expanded its planned social media restrictions for minors, adding Reddit and livestreaming platform Kick to the list of services barred to users under the age of 16.

The decision, announced by the country’s eSafety Commissioner on November 5, marks the latest step in Australia’s aggressive push to curb underage exposure to online risks. The new law, set to take effect on December 10, will enable the government to fine companies up to AU$49.5 million (US$32 million) if they fail to take “reasonable steps” to prevent children under 16 from accessing their platforms.

The expansion builds on an earlier framework that already includes Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X and YouTube, targeting social networks where peer-to-peer communication and algorithmic engagement are most prominent.

Reddit, Kick Join Growing Restricted List

The inclusion of Reddit and Kick reflects the eSafety Commissioner’s intent to adapt the regulation dynamically as new social platforms gain popularity among young users.

Reddit, known for its vast array of discussion forums, and Kick, a streaming service that competes with Twitch, have both seen increasing traction among teenage audiences due to their open, community-driven environments.

However, several major digital platforms, such as Discord, Roblox, Steam, WhatsApp, Google Classroom, and YouTube Kids, are not currently part of the ban. The eSafety office clarified that omission from the list does not equate to a green light for safety, rather, these platforms may fall outside the regulation’s technical definition of “social media services,” which focuses on platforms whose primary purpose is online social interaction.

Compliance Challenges and Technology Gaps

The new law centers on what regulators call a “reasonable steps” test, which requires platforms to deploy multiple methods of age verification and estimation. These can include biometric tools, government ID verification, or contextual analysis of user behavior.

Yet the government’s own research underscores the limitations of these systems. Age estimation technologies have error rates ranging from 25% to 73% for users under 16. The highest inaccuracies are recorded among Indigenous and Asian populations, raising potential fairness and inclusion concerns.

Tech companies now face a compliance conundrum, implement slow, friction-heavy verification processes that frustrate users, or risk millions in fines. The eSafety Commissioner has signaled that compliance expectations will evolve with technology, leaving social media operators chasing a constantly moving target.

Privacy, Enforcement, and the Road Ahead

Enforcement of the new framework begins December 10, 2025, giving companies roughly one year to align with the government’s standards. Providers of age assurance technologies, including software development kits (SDKs) and AI-based verification systems, are under pressure to meet privacy laws while achieving high accuracy across demographics.

Australia’s Privacy Commissioner has emphasized data minimization, advocating for on-device processing and strict limits on personal data retention. This balancing act between safety and privacy creates a complex environment for vendors as they must prove compliance without overstepping on privacy rights.

Industry observers suggest the move could influence global digital policy, as Australia becomes a testing ground for enforceable online age limits. Similar frameworks are being explored in the U.K., European Union, and United States, where lawmakers face the same tension between child protection and digital freedom.

The post Reddit, Kick Added to Australia’s Growing Teen Social Media Blacklist appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16